Dev building in public | crypto, tools & on-chain notes | πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Ή

Solana
Good morning CT β˜• Keep clicking.
7
2
16
970
I might finish building the tool today. After that I’ll need a couple more days to debug and test it. Once everything is done it will be published on GitHub - 100% open source.
I'm building a free and open-source tool named*Vigil* for those who approve transactions in multisig Squads on @solana Before a member votes, they read the proposal directly from the blockchain and explain in simple language what it will do, for example: "transfer 250,000 USDC to this wallet" or "change who controls the program." It flags risks by level (critical, warning, informational), simulates execution to show balances before and after, and verifies the trustworthiness of the programs involved. It functions as a website and as a terminal tool, can send alerts to Discord or Telegram when a new proposal appears, and is read-only: it never asks for keys or signs anything. The goal is for each signatory to approve because they saw exactly what they are approving, not because they trust the proposer.
6
Worth reading. A short take on how our brains and skills have changed since smartphones arrived and how that’s affected us.
Replying to @dogeofficialceo
The dulling of our natural mind is the least natural thing we’ve done, and the process really started when smartphones hit the market. Before the internet IRL we had more attention, spatial orientation, mental calculation, and critical thinking. That development stopped and we’ve most likely already entered a reversal. On the other side of the coin, we developed insane skills no previous generation had like researching, filtering information, fast visual processing, and synthesizing volume. New era, new skills.
14
4d later by the way... I'm going to keep escalating those numbers.
Not bad for 4W timeframe with only 89 followers.
1
40
Deploying more capital into my portfolios.
2
23
And soldier, not a lover, old money, new fame.
2
17
Good morning to all the futures millionaires πŸ‚ Never stop believing. Be delusional.
1
3
29
I didn't more since yesterday, scanning for a safer ticker I can put half port. Wish me luck.
Update: Basically did a 2x on the wallet. I have $10 in padre terminal wallet to catch some small fast pump tokens. Let's keep stacking the portfolio. Road to 1k.
2
18
We will win* I had to brake the chain.
3
29
This is more alarming than most people are treating it. Bitget just lost $351.6 million in a hot/warm wallet heist. Their User Protection Fund sits at roughly $464 million. That is not a comfortable cushion. That is a thin margin on a nine-figure theft. This was a huge heist. Another $200 million and the fund would not have covered users. At that point you do not get a tidy β€œwe’ll make everyone whole” statement. You get a solvency scare, frozen withdrawals because there is nothing left to pay out, and a much bigger crisis of confidence in centralized exchanges. The fact that they can cover it this time is not the story. The story is how close they came to not being able to.
πŸ›‘οΈSAFE: Bitget CEO confirms user funds are SAFE after a $351.6 MILLION hot wallet exploit. Gracy Chen says the full loss is covered by Bitget's User Protection Fund, which holds over $464 MILLION. She says the breach only hit part of the exchange's hot and warm wallets, while its cold wallets "remain fully secure." Deposits and trading remain open, while withdrawals are temporarily paused pending a security review. "We will not run from this. Every dollar and every decision will be accounted for, transparently and in full."
2
81
Actually it was hacked for 350M. That's a brutal amount.
Bitget just got hacked for a whopping $174M. Exchanges were made to trade futures or perps with small size, or to buy crypto. Isn't made to use it as a wallet you can trust and let your funds marinate. Isn't the first time and won't be the last one.
3
36
Good night CT
2
3
25
Bitget just got hacked for a whopping $174M. Exchanges were made to trade futures or perps with small size, or to buy crypto. Isn't made to use it as a wallet you can trust and let your funds marinate. Isn't the first time and won't be the last one.
2
119
CT is kinds boring right now so I might write some thesis.
2
24
SHADY 🐐 retweeted
the people adore sailor i think!
sailor
7
4
29
745
SHADY 🐐 retweeted
Good morning to all the believers
3
2
4
67
Haven’t slept yet. Went to touch some grass. Not sure if I should wait until tonight to sleep or just knock out now. I need to stop being awake all night. It’s horrible for the body and the mind in every way.
2
36
SHADY 🐐 retweeted
Replying to @rubencsq
frfr as long as intern is here you can always hmu
1
1
697
A lot of institutions and companies have been hacked or exploited worldwide in the last week. Might this be correlated with the growth of AI?
2
57
For NFT lovers: just an 8 AM, no-sleep idea that I had.
Hot take on a possible real-life #NFT use case: ***Just to be clear: everything I mentioned would only be possible if governments and relevant authorities allowed and supported this kind of system. I know the idea has flaws and holes, but that's exactly what it is... an idea. The goal is to make ownership transfers simpler, faster, and more efficient. It would still be an NFT, but completely different from what we currently associate NFTs with.*** πŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌ What if NFTs were tied to physical assets like cars or motorcycles? Today, a vehicle has documents containing its ownership, inspection history, accidents, fuel type, etc. Imagine putting that information on-chain and representing the vehicle itself with an NFT. But why? Imagine you're buying a car. You find one on an NFT vehicle marketplace, contact the owner, and meet IRL to inspect it. You decide to buy it. The seller transfers the NFT to your wallet, the payment is made digitally, and ownership is transferred instantly. No paperwork. No bureaucracy. No driving to government facilities. No wasting hours signing documents. Now imagine you're the seller: you get paid digitally and don't have to deal with the same administrative process. And privacy? The ownership doesn't necessarily need to be publicly linked to your identity. For example, the NFT could publicly contain the registration number (New Jersey β€” N10-AAA), while your identity remains private. Police would still be able to identify the owner through their existing databases when legally necessary. The crucial part is how ownership and identity are connected. "But what if I lose my wallet or get hacked? Do I lose my car?" Not necessarily. The ownership-transfer system could have multiple security layers: β€’ Lost seed β†’ one-time recovery code β€’ Stolen wallet β†’ 2–3 authentication factors required for ownership transfer β€’ Temporary freeze β†’ disable transfers until additional authentication is completed β€’ Hardware-only custody (ledger)β†’ vehicle NFTs could be restricted to hardware wallets by default The NFT wouldn't simply be "whoever has the private key owns the car." The ownership protocol itself would be designed around recovery, authentication and legal identity. NFTs don't have to be JPEGs. They could become digital ownership certificates for real-world assets. The technology already exists. The real question is whether we can build the infrastructure around it.
1
2
62
Hot take on a possible real-life #NFT use case: ***Just to be clear: everything I mentioned would only be possible if governments and relevant authorities allowed and supported this kind of system. I know the idea has flaws and holes, but that's exactly what it is... an idea. The goal is to make ownership transfers simpler, faster, and more efficient. It would still be an NFT, but completely different from what we currently associate NFTs with.*** πŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸΌ What if NFTs were tied to physical assets like cars or motorcycles? Today, a vehicle has documents containing its ownership, inspection history, accidents, fuel type, etc. Imagine putting that information on-chain and representing the vehicle itself with an NFT. But why? Imagine you're buying a car. You find one on an NFT vehicle marketplace, contact the owner, and meet IRL to inspect it. You decide to buy it. The seller transfers the NFT to your wallet, the payment is made digitally, and ownership is transferred instantly. No paperwork. No bureaucracy. No driving to government facilities. No wasting hours signing documents. Now imagine you're the seller: you get paid digitally and don't have to deal with the same administrative process. And privacy? The ownership doesn't necessarily need to be publicly linked to your identity. For example, the NFT could publicly contain the registration number (New Jersey β€” N10-AAA), while your identity remains private. Police would still be able to identify the owner through their existing databases when legally necessary. The crucial part is how ownership and identity are connected. "But what if I lose my wallet or get hacked? Do I lose my car?" Not necessarily. The ownership-transfer system could have multiple security layers: β€’ Lost seed β†’ one-time recovery code β€’ Stolen wallet β†’ 2–3 authentication factors required for ownership transfer β€’ Temporary freeze β†’ disable transfers until additional authentication is completed β€’ Hardware-only custody (ledger)β†’ vehicle NFTs could be restricted to hardware wallets by default The NFT wouldn't simply be "whoever has the private key owns the car." The ownership protocol itself would be designed around recovery, authentication and legal identity. NFTs don't have to be JPEGs. They could become digital ownership certificates for real-world assets. The technology already exists. The real question is whether we can build the infrastructure around it.
2
1
2
96