Ritual İstanbul’dan güzel anılar ve güzel merch’lerle ayrıldık 🇹🇷 Uzun süredir ekrandan gördüğümüz insanlarla yüz yüze tanışmak, Ritual ve ürettiklerimiz üzerine sohbet etmek gerçekten çok keyifliydi. Emeği geçen herkese teşekkürler.

Gud luck. fomies.family

Day 2 at the Department of FOMO. 23,000+ applications. One printer fighting for its life. Please form an orderly panic.

crypto has spent years building global financial infrastructure. but global access doesn't automatically create a local financial experience. most wallets still expect users to adapt to the system: think in dollars, understand multiple networks, and navigate unfamiliar financial products. what if the application adapted to the user instead? @StartaleGroup's Japan Edition offers an interesting example. it provides yen-denominated portfolio views, localized deposit and swap experiences, and asset management across Ethereum and Soneium. the more interesting part is its roadmap: future JPYSC integration, Japan-specific financial products, and localized earning opportunities. this goes beyond translating an interface. it's about building a financial experience around how people actually manage money. but there's an important distinction. displaying a portfolio in yen isn't the same as having native digital yen infrastructure. the first changes how users see their money. the second could change how that money moves, settles, and interacts with financial products. that's where Startale's broader ecosystem becomes relevant. JPYSC is being developed to connect regulated yen with onchain finance, while Startale App provides the consumer interface. together, they illustrate a possible direction for localized financial services, although JPYSC integration remains on the roadmap. global blockchain infrastructure doesn't require every user to have the same financial experience. the infrastructure can be global. the financial experience should feel local. localization isn't just translating the interface. it's adapting onchain finance to the way people actually use money.

I hold a light. One of 666. @numencash is born on @ritualfnd — every token pays for its own thinking, or goes dark. 666 places. One shot. numen.cash/soon?ref=M6BsgIQ

Tokens with minds of their own. The first minds wake when @ritualfnd mainnet opens. Hold one of 666 places ➡ numen.cash

A smooth robotic demonstration can still be bad training data. A robot might complete a manipulation task with precise movements and almost no hesitation. Everything looks impressive, but what if one hand disappears from the camera during a critical action? Or the completed task doesn't actually match the original instruction? Should that demonstration still receive a high quality score? This is where @PrismaXai's Verify Quality system makes an important distinction between eligibility and quality. Before evaluating how well a robot performs, validators first establish whether the demonstration meets the basic requirements for usable training data. The task must match its instruction, relevant actions must remain visible, footage must be sufficiently clear, and the execution must satisfy the required standards. Failing a critical requirement can disqualify an episode, regardless of how impressive the rest of the demonstration looks. Only after passing these checks does the second stage begin. Validators assess trajectory speed, smoothness, completion quality, diversity, and how much of the intended task was completed. The distinction matters because these stages answer two fundamentally different questions. Eligibility determines whether the demonstration meets the minimum standard. Quality determines how valuable that valid demonstration may be. PrismaX extends this process through independent human validation. Multiple validators evaluate each episode, their scores contribute to a consensus, and disagreements can trigger expert review. This introduces a layer of human judgment alongside automated checks, helping the network apply consistent quality standards as data collection scales. The deeper idea is that collecting more robotic demonstrations means little if the training pipeline cannot consistently distinguish useful experience from misleading examples. First establish what deserves to enter the dataset. Then determine how valuable it is. A high score should never compensate for a demonstration that fails the basic requirements for learning.

gm and may all of your airdrops cook like @variational_io speaking of which, they're giving out 32% of their supply fully unlocked at TGE this is a good example to follow, right? so @niraj @ckartik_ do you think we can increase the @ritualnet supply up to at least 3% (like monad did) It is not very difficult to do this, you just have to want it and teams that want it are able to do it thank you for your consideration on this matter 😁

A teleoperator is not just a temporary pair of hands. Every completed task can leave behind something that matters beyond the task itself: a record of the operator’s experience, work quality, specialization, and improvement over time. That is an important part of @PrismaXai’s original teleoperation design. As operators work, PrismaX describes the network accumulating a trace of their experience, the quality of their work, and the tasks they are best at. The protocol also rewards improvement in productivity over time. This means a teleoperation task can create two lasting outputs: Robotics data helps train better models. Operator knowledge helps the network understand who may be better suited for different kinds of work. Over time, that changes how a robotic labor network can scale. A new task does not have to exist in isolation from everything an operator has done before. Past performance can become part of the network’s coordination logic. Some operators may become especially strong at precision manipulation. Others may develop speed and consistency in repetitive tasks or become more effective with specialized control hardware. Their skill does not disappear when one task ends. It compounds into reputation. That is the deeper idea: PrismaX is not only accumulating data about how robots move. It is also accumulating knowledge about who is good at making them move. For Physical AI, skilled operators are not just labor. They become part of the infrastructure.

Ribbit!🐸 The mint is set📜 🗓️ Monday, 21 Sept ⏰ 5:00 PM UTC 🛠️ 6969 · Free mint IMPORTANT: 👛 Noir wallet ONLY ⛽ Keep at least 0.007 ZEC in wallet for gas & protocol fee Not on the Froglist? Apply: zecfrogs.xyz Wallet checker drops soon! Stay tuned & Turn on🔔

🎁 ZEC FROGS GTD GIVEAWAY 🐸 5 lucky winners will get a GTD spot for @zecfrogs Supply: 6,969 Mint: FREE Chain: ZEC Mint: Sep 21 · 5 PM UTC How to enter: → Follow @zecfrogs - @kriptosensei0 → Like + RT this post x.com/zecfrogs/status/210167… → Drop your ZEC wallet address below (u1) Noir Wallet ONLY Submit a shielded u1 address.

24 HOURS 100 GTD 🍌 RT + DROP YOUR SHIELDED WALLETS👇

Applying for the @ShieldedWizards whitelist 🧙‍♂️ Shielded NFTs on Zcash. Privacy is magic. #ZEC

nitter.net/wickonzec/status/21014… The concept is simple, but the visual identity already feels strong. Watching LASTWICK closely.

🕯️ The wick is lit Something is burning in the dark. LASTWICK is here: 999 candles Free mint on $ZEC The Form is now OPEN! Apply: form.lastwick.xyz

🎁 GIVEAWAY 5 SPOTS NFT don’t always have to just sit in your wallet. Zeckers is building an NFT ecosystem powered by $ZEC, where holders can participate and explore how their NFT can create value over time. 3333 supply Blockchain: ZEC Mint: 0.0026 $ZEC To enter: → Follow @ZeckersNFT + me → Like + RT this post → Like + RT nitter.net/ZeckersNFT/status/2100… → Drop your ZEC address in the comments ⏳ 24 hours only. 5 winners. Good luck!

One thing I like about @Zeccatnft is that it doesn’t pretend every NFT mechanic on Zcash has to be “private.” Ownership is transparent by design, tracked through the carrier history on t1 addresses. The interesting part is how the rest of the system is built around that reality: separate payment and NFT vault addresses, carrier-aware transfers, seller-approved trades, and atomic settlement. Better UX doesn’t come from hiding the constraints. It comes from designing around them.

10k ghosts. Zero faces. Proven on-chain. Identity off. @zkghosts_

Most NFT projects start with the collection and bolt the marketplace on later. @Zeccatnft is taking the opposite approach on Zcash. Each ZecCat moves through a 546-zatoshi carrier, payments and NFT custody use separate addresses, mint delivery + payment settle atomically, and secondary trades stay seller-approved instead of handing custody to the marketplace. What interests me here isn’t just 3,333 pixel cats. It’s the attempt to design the entire NFT flow around how Zcash actually works, rather than importing EVM marketplace assumptions and changing the logo.

I'm applying for the @zeccatnft whitelist. My Zeccat Entry Pass is ZC-6DB7590E774A. Community preview only.

If you think ZecCats are just cute little cats, you might want to look a little closer 🐱 There’s a lot more being built behind them. Exclusive holder benefits, rewards and a bigger ecosystem around the collection. Our next post will explain exactly how it all works. The cats are cute, but the utility is serious.