The US supplies 20% of all the world's sea-traded diesel. Banning US diesel exports would cause domestic storage tanks to overflow. This would force refineries to cut production. That would ultimately drive up fuel prices. TRUMP'S SOCIALISTIC + INTERVENTIONIST POLICIES = A NONSENSICAL DISASTER.

Sep 27, 2026 · 11:15 AM UTC

15
69
217
23,319
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @steve_hanke
Typical Wall Street denizen. Screw Americans so US companies can make obscene profits. Well done.
1
226
Replying to @steve_hanke
Don't have to ban, can just be selective, which is what will happen
96
Replying to @steve_hanke
You think Trump understands this?
53
Replying to @steve_hanke
Just set a export tax per gallon/barrel of finished motor products.
69
Replying to @steve_hanke
US needs to at least keep diesel flowing to the western hemisphere.
1
1
55
Replying to @steve_hanke
Does destroying Russian refineries affect prices?
1
42
Replying to @steve_hanke
..
BREAKING: Australia could face diesel rationing within weeks and prices above A$4 a litre, nearly 40% above today, if the US goes ahead with its export ban, the most worrying development in global fuel markets since the war began, per MST Marquee's head of energy research. Australia is the world's largest importer of diesel in absolute terms, accounting for 1% of global fuel demand but 10% of the world's seaborne diesel imports, and it runs an economy weighted to agriculture and mining. A ban could force the government to stage 3 and 4 of its National Fuel Security Plan, which covers demand reduction and directed allocation of supply. The US exports about 1.3 million barrels of diesel a day, a quarter of its refining output, and has been covering the gap left as Russia and China stopped exporting refined fuels. The UK is now preparing rationing plans of its own, with 42 days of diesel left as of July.
19
Replying to @steve_hanke
Trump should do it. So, people globally would buy even more EV. Get this done. Fight climate change.
2
32
Replying to @steve_hanke
👈 Andreas Krieg @andreas_krieg, in an interview with @DoubleDownNews, offered a close analysis of the balance of power in the war and said: ✅ The #Houthis, still in flip-flops, have made a #global_naval_blockade possible. ✅ #Saudi_Arabia cannot prevail over the Houthis by military means. ✅ The #United_States and #Israel #killed the diplomatic track and #buried_it. Now: 🔺 The #Iranian_Yemeni_axis_of_resistance controls two strategic chokepoints — #Bab_el_Mandeb and the #Strait_of_Hormuz — on which the world economy wholly depends. 🔺 The #Israeli_Emirati_axis is putting the #partition_of_Yemen into practice. Israel pursues that project through the UAE, which has become a #second_Israel. ◀️ Read the full interview here, set out in the style of #analytic_philosophy👇👇 x.com/GanjiAkbar/status/2104…
🎥 The #Houthis, still in flip-flops, have made a #global_naval_blockade possible; #Saudi_Arabia cannot win by military means; the #United_States and #Israel killed the diplomatic track; the #Iranian_Yemeni_axis_of_resistance now holds the chokepoints of #Bab_el_Mandeb and the #Strait_of_Hormuz, while the #Israeli_Emirati_axis is putting the #partition_of_Yemen into practice 👇👇 👈 Double Down News interview with Andreas Krieg @andreas_krieg, Associate Professor of Defence Studies at King’s College London, member of the directing staff at the Royal College of Defence Studies, fellow of the Institute of Middle Eastern Studies; interviewer Richard Sanders @PulaRJS, @DoubleDownNews ✅ 1 — Claims 🔺1.1 A mountain militia in Yemen — many of them still in flip-flops — can impose a naval blockade not only on Saudi Arabia but on the world; the strait is so narrow that even an anti-tank missile is enough. 🔺1.2 That is a strategic disaster for regional stability, national security and the prosperity of the Saudi kingdom; Riyadh has no military way out. 🔺1.3 An Israel–Houthi war is also under way, and the Houthis have seized the resistance narrative; Israel is pressing London, the EU and Washington to sanction them and re-designate them as terrorists. 🔺1.4 Trump does not even know where Yemen is; there is no strategy; everything is ad hoc. Houthi power comes more from the weakness of their antagonists than from any absolute tactical genius of their own. 🔺1.5 Some 377,000 people have died in the civil war, most of them children; for sixty years almost no one has cared about Yemenis — only about supply chains and maritime traffic. 🔺1.6 The Houthis receive Iranian support, but there is no Tehran hotline that can simply tell them to stop; running Yemen is dancing on the head of a snake; no one is truly in charge. 🔺1.7 The UAE branded the Yemen war a “Saudi-led war” while remaining a partner in the fighting and in the atrocities. 🔺1.8 Global trade is being hit by two Middle Eastern wars: Iran constrains Hormuz, the Houthis hold Bab el-Mandeb; the West and its proxies cannot break that grip. 🔺1.9 Yemen is geographically unconquerable; Rome, Britain, 1960s Egypt and 2015 Saudi Arabia all failed in the hinterland; it is an empire’s graveyard in the Afghan sense. 🔺1.10 Saudi Arabia’s “one-month” operation lasted years and made the Houthis stronger; Gaza then emboldened them in the resistance narrative. ✅ 2 — Arguments 🔺2.1 If mountainous terrain, a thin coastal strip and tribal society have blocked every external force, repeating the air campaign is a known error. 🔺2.2 If the Houthis fight with a small, decentralised footprint and know how to buy and co-opt locally, the collapse of the anti-Houthi coalition — ghost soldiers, paper units, no will to fight — explains the advance better than Houthi brilliance alone. 🔺2.3 If the colonial map of highland north versus Aden south is still the main fault line, an artificial “united Yemen” is not a durable war-fighting basis. 🔺2.4 If the Iran–Houthi tie is at arm’s length, and Hezbollah was a direct Iranian creation, reducing the Houthis to Tehran’s puppets is a false explanation. 🔺2.5 If Saleh’s state was built on paper units and layered extortion, the fall of Sanaa was the antagonist’s collapse, not a classic conquest. 🔺2.6 If for Riyadh Yemen is a domestic soft underbelly rather than an external file, 2015 was a security reflex, not imperial expansion — but the tool (remote war) did not match the aim. 🔺2.7 If the UAE landed by sea at Aden, built a southern proxy and stayed out of the mountains, two parallel wars followed: Saudi versus Houthi, and Abu Dhabi consolidating the south. 🔺2.8 If the Houthis have a single anti-imperial narrative while others fight for local interest, their combat force stays more cohesive than the anti-Houthi coalition even when their governance is weak. 🔺2.9 If the blockade of ports and airspace produced a humanitarian catastrophe and pinned the image of starvation on Riyadh, the reputational cost of the war is not separable from the military cost. 🔺2.10 If in 2025 Israel and the United States put sanctions and fifty days of bombing in place of the Omani table, the political track was killed by design, not spoiled by accident. ✅ 3 — Evidence 🔺3.1 Krieg: Rome and Britain never reached the hinterland; Britain stayed around Aden; Egypt and Saudi Arabia failed. 🔺3.2 In 2014 the Houthis took Sanaa because the army and ministries were staffed with ghost soldiers and ghost clerks. 🔺3.3 In 2015 King Salman gave the order; Mohammed bin Salman became defence minister and the GCC entered with an air campaign; the UAE carried out its first major amphibious operation at Aden. 🔺3.4 From 2015 the blockade of the north produced the worst humanitarian crisis of the moment; by 2021 the UN recorded about 377,000 deaths, the indirect share mostly children. 🔺3.5 The UAE built the Southern Transitional Council as an umbrella; its ideological priority was fighting Islah/the Brotherhood, not necessarily the Houthis. 🔺3.6 First Saudi–UAE splits in 2017 and 2019; the 2022 UN ceasefire locked in Houthi control of the highlands and the other side’s hold on the southern plains and coast, and it held on the ground even while missiles were being fired at Israel. 🔺3.7 The UAE pushed proxy influence into Aden, logistics, Socotra and Hadramawt — oil country that Riyadh treats as “its own province”; Krieg’s formula is “two and a half Yemens.” 🔺3.8 The Emirati secessionist axis: Yemen’s STC, Puntland/Jubaland/Somaliland, Sudan’s RSF through to Libya’s LNA; Israel plugged into that axis; Israeli operatives have been reported on Socotra. 🔺3.9 In late 2025 Saudi Arabia struck a UAE weapons shipment to Mukalla/the east; Abu Dhabi said it was pulling back but the proxies stayed; southern protests over rights and pay then targeted Saudi financial weakness. 🔺3.10 Tareq Saleh’s “National Resistance” — 20–25,000 men on paper — dissolved on the west coast in hours; videos that morning and noon showed weapons being sold and pledges of allegiance to the Houthis. 🔺3.11 Riyadh asked Trump to bomb; Washington said no. The Mecca pact with Turkey and Pakistan is signed but not yet ratified or implemented. 🔺3.12 The Houthis hit Saudi Arabia’s East–West pipeline to the Red Sea; repair will take at least three months; Bab el-Mandeb is closed to Saudi shipping; Hormuz is also a chokepoint. 🔺3.13 In May 2025 in Muscat, a US–Houthi deal: do not hit American ships, and America will not hit the Houthis; Israel was not in the deal and felt stabbed in the back. 🔺3.14 Shipping insurance has risen; even without a shot fired, the choice is a costly Suez transit or a long Cape route; the European consumer pays more and waits longer. ✅ 4 — Conclusions 🔺4.1 The Houthis stand on a narrow chokepoint with cheap technology; “flip-flops on the throat of world trade” is a description of the situation, not a joke. 🔺4.2 Saudi Arabia could manage 2015; it cannot manage 2026: two straits, a wrecked pipeline, a budget deficit, a population of some 35 million, paper proxies and no UAE. 🔺4.3 The UAE as “Little Sparta” has no grand strategy; its skill is managing, dividing and governing below the boiling point; it does not want a stronger Houthi, but it does want Saudi Arabia stuck in an unwinnable war. 🔺4.4 Israel profits from the breakup of states and has entered southern Yemen through the Emirati channel; it is the hidden variable in the equation. 🔺4.5 America leaves its allies without cover in turn: one day fifty days of bombing, one day a Muscat deal, one day a no to Riyadh; the local message is that Washington does not have their back. 🔺4.6 The Houthis say they will hit only Saudi shipping; the market still prices insurance and uncertainty, not verbal promises. 🔺4.7 Houthi governance is not institutional or efficient either; their craft is dancing on the head of a snake and buying silence, not state-building. 🔺4.8 The air-war military solution has failed repeatedly; paid proxies do not fight. The remaining path was an inclusive political process with every faction — and that path was killed in 2025. 🔺4.9 No one is fighting for Yemenis; they are fighting for the strait. So long as Bab el-Mandeb is in Houthi coastal range, every actor has to put that card into the calculation. 🔺4.10 Practical conclusion: two models stand against each other; the Houthis hold Bab el-Mandeb and Iran constrains Hormuz; the Israeli–Emirati secessionist axis breaks the state; and Riyadh is left between them without America.
60
Replying to @steve_hanke
👈 You don’t believe it? Look for yourselves: Israelis are competing over genocide, ethnic cleansing, land theft and racism. ✅ It is not only Abby Martin @AbbyMartin and Norman Finkelstein @normfinkelstein who say so; Netanyahu @netanyahu says it better than anyone 👇👇 x.com/GanjiAkbar/status/2104…
🎥 #Demonization_of_Israels_Palestinian_citizens is the axis and the center of #Netanyahus_election_campaign in #Israels_racist_society: the fictitious myths of the #Old_Testament are Israelis’ basis for #genocide and #apartheid👇👇 👈 From 5 September to today Netanyahu @netanyahu has repeated the same campaign line in 12 successive posts: “the Arab parties.” Arabs are roughly one-fifth of Israel’s population; in every one of the 12 posts, the parties these citizens vote for are presented as the danger. The supposed coalition partners change; the Arab parties are fixed in all 12. Newest first: 🔺 “Mansour Abbas’s @mnsorabbas No. 2 reveals the truth: Eisenkot @gadi_eisenkot will form a government with Yair Golan @YairGolan1, Liberman @AvigdorLiberman, Bennett @naftalibennett and the Arab parties.” 🔺 “Eisenkot will form a left-wing government with Liberman, Yair Golan, Bennett and the Arab parties. Only a big Likud will stop them.” 🔺 “Eisenkot will form a left-wing government with Yair Golan and the Arab parties.” 🔺 “Ahmad Tibi @Ahmad_tibi reveals Eisenkot’s plan tonight: a left-wing government with Golan, Liberman and the Arab parties.” 🔺 “Tonight it becomes clear again that Eisenkot will form a government with Golan, Liberman and the Arab parties.” 🔺 “Now everyone knows… Don’t say you didn’t know… Eisenkot’s No. 2 admits… Now it is official… Raviv Drucker @RavivDrucker: Eisenkot is even more left-wing than Yair Golan.” 🔺 Count: 12 / 12 “the Arab parties”; 12 / 12 Yair Golan; 10 / 12 Liberman; 2 / 12 Bennett, and only in the newest posts. ✅ Abby Martin @AbbyMartin and Norman Finkelstein @normfinkelstein have said for years, and keep repeating: Israel’s problem is not Netanyahu; the core problem is that Netanyahu is a copy of Israeli society. Finkelstein insists that instead of the term “Zionism” one should use Jewish supremacism or Jewish racism; that supremacism is structurally institutionalized in Israeli society. ✅ The same two say that a very large majority of Israelis defend genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, state terrorism, apartheid and ethnic cleansing, and hold that even a Palestinian infant should be shown no mercy. 🔹 Abby Martin and Norman Finkelstein are entirely right in this analysis. When the Israeli army’s own hidden-camera footage was released showing Israeli soldiers sexually assaulting Palestinian captives, Israeli television channels brought the perpetrators on air and welcomed them as heroes; in a poll a 56 percent majority defended sexual violence against Palestinians; and when the sexual assault of Palestinian prisoners — even with trained dogs — was exposed, a large part of the society still remained pleased. 🔹 Netanyahu rides this society and knows exactly what psychological and moral traits they have, and what they want. But the likes of Thomas Friedman @tomfriedman and Chuck Schumer @SenSchumer, the Senate minority leader, frame the problem as Netanyahu alone; whereas all of his rivals are copies of the same society: they treat land theft from 1948 to the present as their right, read the Old Testament as a title deed, and cite the myths of Amalek and Esther for genocide and the massacre of infants, claiming that these myths are the personal commands of God to the Jews to seize the entire Middle East and build Greater Israel.
48
Replying to @steve_hanke
Diesel is always used
1
1
25
Replying to @steve_hanke
Interesting perspective
11
Replying to @steve_hanke
not quite,trust trump 5d chess
17
Replying to @steve_hanke
So your're saying "No Magaginia's, there is no Diesel Clause"?
8