Official since 2011. No story ideas please. Other than for promotion and PR I'm not here a lot, mostly on Patreon, so posts there will get a faster reply

Los Angeles, CA
From time to time folks will see a discussion of my work and say "I didn't know you worked on (fill in the gap)", or don't know I worked on *anything* after the 90s. Hence, this video, updated for 2026, but which doesn't have the upcoming new movies. piped.video/w_aP30AI7ts
8
20
211
15,003
Replying to @straczynski
@straczynski re watching season 2 of B5. Can you give a little more light to where the Technomages “went”?
30
16
380
7,010
The folks at Union Square just informed me that according to Bookscan, HARLAN ELLISON'S GREATEST HITS is the #5 top-selling SF Anthology of all time, and #1 for the period from 2021-present. Over 170,000 copies in print, available here in three versions. hachettebookgroup.com/titles…
1
9
93
2,918
I want to be clear: this wasn't a matter of people's "inability to understand nuance" that this was a theoretical discussion...alleging they're stupid,. When messages appear here saying verbatim that "Straczynski IS WRITING IT" are a declarative statement, not nuance.
Yeah, sadly external people to the conversations inability to understand nuance and that this was a discussion about what would be cool to see, is a problem. Granted, not sure what I expect here on this hellsite. Sorry @straczynski didn't mean to cause your emails to blow up.

ALT the real ghostbusters television GIF

1
5
52
8,203
No. People have been strapped to chairs for abuse since we've had them. There were just wrist and ankle bracelets, same as for the electric chair (with accompanying zaps).
Replying to @straczynski
It's just that the description used by the scriptwriter for the channel matches a lot of what you put into that sequence in that episode so I just wondering if maybe you were aware of those specific Amnesty International reports?
18
2,684
No, and no. It's a series of data points, not a story.
Replying to @straczynski
Is there any chance of your outline for Crusade's 5 year arc being released at some point? Or the content planned for it being released in some other form?
3
2
75
5,093
This happened in Season 4 of Crusade. The Technomage (not Galen) who took matters into his own hands to cook up the virus died in the process. But mission accomplished. Y'all saw that one, right?
The Drakh were literally destroyed from within. Poison the keeper egg farms with slow acting, ridiculously virulent plague before being implanted/grown in the Drakh, and by the time they figure out what's going on, it's too late. Modified Markab virus. Waste not, want not.
51
21
461
20,248
The Drakh were literally destroyed from within. Poison the keeper egg farms with slow acting, ridiculously virulent plague before being implanted/grown in the Drakh, and by the time they figure out what's going on, it's too late. Modified Markab virus. Waste not, want not.
Replying to @straczynski
Fascinating. Logical follow up, if you do not mind me asking, how would one be free of the keeper influence? I assume there is a third option other than dying and/or destroying the Drakh race, based on David being keeper free (maybe?) as of the events of the final episode.
8
8
180
30,932
Something for everyone is nothing for anyone.
Me complaining about this aside, they're never going to do Martin Gero's Stargate--it's clear as day. That said, the #SaveStargate campaign has undoubtedly been heard loud and clear. If there's any hope left, it's that we've at least convinced whoever is spearheading the writing team and new showrunners to be faithful to what the core of Stargate is. I wouldn't count "in the existing canon" as an impossibility, but let's be reminded that in new Trek, they tried to retcon things into the old canon to force their own (very) unique take on Trek to satisfy the old guard. It did get a few on board, but it also divided the fandom sharply, particularly along political lines, as the publicity and showrunners were exclusively catering to one group of people. This is not what we need in Stargate, which has somehow always catered to everyone. How is that possible, then? Because it knew what it was and was made for people who love military sci-fi and wanted a deep experience. The opposite is also true: make someone for everyone, and you please almost no one.
12
29
299
11,381
If it grew back it wasn't fully killed.
Replying to @straczynski
Ok, yeah, because (again, correct me if I’m wrong) Captain Jacks keeper was killed but was replaced by another one or the same one grew back (?).
5
1
62
5,739
Both die.
Replying to @straczynski
Can a Keeper be transferred to another host if the previous host dies or do the both die?
3
100
5,396
I only caught that at the last moment in the galleys from the publisher, too late to change it. Such is life.
Replying to @straczynski
That must have been a mistake or author choice in Book 3 of the “Legions of Fire” trilogy that gave the solution to saving David Sheridan as simply killing the Drakh that spawned the keeper, as Vir and Garibaldi deduced (granted it was a novel and not your work).
1
4
72
7,503
The only thing required was to check his body and metabolism to make sure that he would survive the merging, and that the keeper would survive it; same as when you give blood, you want to make sure it goes to the right person.
That was my confusion. I assumed that the host was genetically prepped to be compatible with the keepers and Drakh controller based on the abduction and procedures done on Londo just prior to getting his keeper, as in the keeper was his and his alone. It couldn’t body jump.
2
4
70
4,285
Forgot to add: killing the Drakh that supplied the keeper wouldn't kill or disable it, it'd just change frequencies. And since the one on Londo died with him, and there wasn't a nearby Drakh (and Vir knew what was going on) he knew to stay clear.
No, the idea would be the keeper dies when the host dies. Unless I’m mistaken they are grown for that specific host. So, when Londo died, his keeper died with him…or that’s the general idea. The other way would be to kill the Drakh that spawned the keeper.
6
9
188
9,490
Technically not correct on both counts. To pull out a keeper kills both; they're not made for one person; when the Regent's keeper left, it died soon afterward, which was why the Drakh had to supply another one like a parasitoid or emerald wasp .
No, the idea would be the keeper dies when the host dies. Unless I’m mistaken they are grown for that specific host. So, when Londo died, his keeper died with him…or that’s the general idea. The other way would be to kill the Drakh that spawned the keeper.
3
1
68
4,812
Your Highness was taken.
Thanks for that. Why are you known as “Your Majesty (witty answer only)?
1
29
3,573
Having had many good interactions with them over the years, I can safely say that Amnesty International recognizes that humans have been torturing, interrogating and gaslighting other humans with different or similar techniques for as long as we've been on the planet.
Replying to @straczynski
Wait, what? Amnesty International would disagree with you, sir.
1
17
2,110
Deleting this one would also be appreciated. "It all depends on what @straczynski would want to do since he's writing it."
2
17
2,850
I understand, but when you write "Joe is writing this," without clarifying that this is a thought experiment, people tend to believe that I'm writing something...and my email loads up. A note to always be careful when invoking someone's name as working on something.
Apologies. The open world Real Ghostbusters game was just a thought I had, as I’ve been thinking we need another story by JMS. At first, I pitched a 40th anniversary comic, but I thought an open world video game would be better. Either way, all pure imagination and nothing real.
1
3
69
5,048
I'm getting a ton of emails from people asking if I'm working on this...and apparently there isn't a "this" to work on in the first place. Can you either cut this thread or rephrase it before carrying my name into something that doesn't exist?
1
32
5,528