THIS 👇🏽👇🏽 TRUTH 🔥🔥 I’ll join HIS CHURCH ASAP!!

We don't need no Hollywood.

A resurfaced interview captures the real tension surrounding Ruthless Records, Death Row, contracts and royalties, with fans saying it shows a side of Eazy that the 2015 biopic didn’t fully capture. Did the biopic get Eazy-E wrong?

Right ring pundits think Byron Donald’s at the top of this ticket is going to make gains with Black voters for Republicans. If you want to understand why a lot of Black folk, have such a problem with Byron Donalds and are calling him out right now, look at the record: This isn’t about him being a Black Republican. It’s about what he has repeatedly supported, opposed and defended as a Black man. 1. HIS COMMENTS ABOUT BLACK FAMILIES UNDER JIM CROW Donalds actually said: “During Jim Crow, the Black family was together… Black people have always always been conservative-minded, but more Black people voted conservatively.” “Black people voted conservatively.” But the reality is, during Jim Crow, Black people couldn’t vote. He romanticized a time when we were legally segregated, shut out of schools, jobs, housing and economic opportunity. 🧵👇🏽

Drake doesn’t own his music” That’s false. • Pre-2018: UMG owns the bulk of the masters, but Drake still owns publishing and retains contractual/master interests. That’s real ownership, not zero. • Post-2018: Drake owns or co-owns his masters. UMG acts as a licensed distributor, not an absolute owner. That’s why Drake’s company has legal standing in court to claim streaming and licensing harm. If he “didn’t own his music,” he wouldn’t. “Contractual / master interests” — plain English It means Drake has legally enforceable rights tied to the master recordings, even if he does not own 100% of them outright. Let’s break it down clearly. ⸻ 1️⃣ “Master interests” This refers to any ownership stake or control connected to the sound recordings (the masters). You do not need to own 100% of a master to have a master interest. Examples of master interests: •Partial ownership (co-ownership) •Beneficial ownership (economic interest) •Reversionary ownership (ownership that returns after a term) •Approval or veto rights over certain uses •A defined share of licensing revenue So when we say Drake has master interests, it means: 👉 he has real, recognized rights in the recordings themselves, not just a paycheck. ⸻ 2️⃣ “Contractual interests” This means those rights exist because of contracts, even if the copyright registration lists another owner. Contracts can grant an artist: •Guaranteed revenue participation tied to the master •Audit rights •Control over licensing, sync, or exclusivity •Restrictions on how recordings are exploited •Rights that expand or revert over time In other words: •UMG may appear as the owner on paper •But Drake’s contracts limit what UMG can do and guarantee Drake’s stake That’s still ownership in the legal sense, even if it’s not exclusive. ⸻ 3️⃣ Why this matters legally (and in court) Courts don’t ask: “Who owns 100%?” They ask: “Who has ownership standing?” If Drake had: •only artist royalties, no ownership •no contractual master rights He could not claim economic harm tied to streaming or licensing. The fact that his company can assert harm means: ✅ he holds master-level contractual interests, not just royalties. ⸻ 4️⃣ Simple analogy (no music jargon) Think of real estate: •UMG = owns most of the building •Drake = owns a legally protected share + has rights over how it’s used UMG can’t act like Drake isn’t an owner just because they own more square footage. ⸻ ✅ Final, clean definition “Contractual/master interests” means: Drake has legally enforceable rights and economic ownership tied directly to the master recordings, even if he does not own 100% of them outright. That’s why saying “Drake owns nothing pre-2018” is incorrect.

Iran's Message to Pete Hegseth.