“This morning, we notified the government that we are filing a lawsuit today to protect our First Amendment rights and defend the principle that the government does not decide what the press reports or publishes,” the three news organizations said in a joint statement on Monday. cnn.com/2026/09/21/politics/…
10,337
3,389
20,034
761,689
Replying to @kaitlancollins
This’ll be fun.

Sep 21, 2026 · 11:15 AM UTC

31
238
2,652
19,029
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
The citizens of the United States need a good lawyer to file a lawsuit against @CNN for the harm done to our entire society. Some smart lawyer should be able to figure the damages
4
1
39
304
Did you bother reading groks reply and then the reason trump banned them? If it’s overturned are you going to complain like a child?
7
13
524
I did! Do you think this is transparent?
1
1
32
288
Especially since you're wrong. As soon as the president opens up the White House to the press, and bans some members of the press because they hurt his feelings with the truth, he violates the constitution. Google is your friend.
7
9
384
Current reality - they’ve had this lawsuit ready to go since Nov 2024. They’ll get them before some super lunatic lefty judge in record time (cuz no one else’s life involved in court cases matter, those are pushed back for this bs) & get a ruling to be let back in.
2
7
255
so truth is a Security risk? Thats what you’re saying?
5
217
The Fake News and The Communist Party ( Former Democrat Party) are the true enemies of the American people!!
1
6
167
Does it protect against an 80 year old demented convict who can’t answer a mediocre question?
4
4
407
Capacity is a viable issue. WH simply has to give "their" seats to other journalists.
3
228
That leaves out the case actually dealing with WH press passes: Sherrill v. Knight. It cited Zemel & Pell but still held that once the WH opens press facilities to bona fide journalists, access cannot be denied arbitrarily or based on the content of their reporting.
1
2
326
I would be willing the press doesn’t know that. I sure didn’t
1
2
82
I am guessing you didn't make it to the last sentence. In your defense, there were some big words prior and giving up might have been reasonable for you.
1
1
123
That's what I've been saying! Evidently their attorney is as uneducated about the Constitution as they are! 🤣🤡💩
1
42
Didn't read the last part did you?
43
Exactly. Denials cannot be arbitrary or viewpoint based. Even an AI bot understands that Trump's going to lose this one.
9
Shes pissed off over not being able to report from inside the WH press room. She now has to produce her fake news from outside the WH lawn behind the gates. So now, she & others are crying wolf and creating a false 1st Amendment infringement narrative to gain public sympathy.
1
Based on the last part alone, you have to know this will fall through. It's fun watching him fuck with the media though.
2
Yes it will!!! Can't wait to hear @RobGouveiaEsq go through this one!!!
1
60
It is absolutely @CNN’s right to serve as a #fakenews #propaganda machine for @TheDemocrats . It is not their right to be admitted access to the @WhiteHouse to spread their lies and #misinformation. Cry harder.
40
Biden did the same
1
3
68
According to Trump, we’re gonna get all our news from Breitbart
1
148
Well they should win if the bottom part of the paragraph is true
1
1
41
It will be @grok What was the Sherrill v. Knight ruling from 1977?
1
155
That is a great post. Keep up the good work.
18
Yes, it will be.
8