So far KDE's approach is - among the traditional Linux platforms - the best and most workable approach to AI.
"Use whatever tool is appropriate but it's still your code" and no ideological dos and donts.
As said many times before, each to their own - it's perfectly ok for a maintainer to reject AI-assisted or -written code. Just don't be surprised when folks go and fix stuff elsewhere in the future- or fork, I guess.
This is the way. Accept code on merit and ensure that a person takes accountability for it. Doesn’t matter if it was typed, chiseled, generated, or bit-flipped via magnetized needle on a chip.
If it’s good, it’s good. If it’s slop, it’s slop.