Software Developer, Founder of @Microlancer

United States
Dumb people don't buy Bitcoin, only smart people do. Only Bitcoiners will survive. Nature is healing.
1
148
ビットコイン⚡ retweeted
One thing before I start: everything in this post is public information from my own docket. None of it is new, and I'm not revealing anything you can't already find in the court filings yourself. The retrial just got pushed to April 26, 2027. The order came down today (Dkt. 300). My acquittal motion is still sitting there, undecided. I honestly don't know when this ends. Prosecutors are supposed to protect American interests and go after people who broke the law. A jury deadlocked on the two most serious counts against me. And still SDNY won't stop, because this case was never just about me. It's about setting an example. Don't take my word for it. Tara La Morte, the chief of SDNY's Illicit Finance and Money Laundering Unit, said it herself at a New York City Bar Association event (Law360, Feb. 23, 2024; filed on my docket as Doc. 25-2): "We want the industry to take notice." "What we're trying to do is sort of bring the industry into compliance, and I think Tornado Cash is an example of that." An example. Out of a developer who wrote code. At that same event, her deputy praised the government's blockchain-tracing partner, Chainalysis. Here is what they didn't tell the audience. All of it is from the public docket in my case. According to the trial transcripts, Chainalysis was running its OWN Tornado Cash relayer, and earning fees on the transactions flowing through it. - Chainalysis's own lawyers admitted to "a relayer node that Chainalysis operated"; my subpoena sought documents on Tornado Cash relayer(s) "used from March to August 2022." (Dkt. 211) - In open court, the prosecutor said it plainly: "I think the parties agree as to that part of the testimony, that the Chainalysis relayer earned fees." Same hearing: "there's zero evidence that the defendant was in any way aware that Chainalysis was running a relayer." (Dkt. 259, July 25, 2025) So the company that helped trace my "criminal" transactions was itself profiting from Tornado Cash transactions, while I was prosecuted over software I helped create. And when my lawyers subpoenaed them to testify? - Chainalysis moved to quash. (Dkt. 211) - The government backed them: "Your Honor, we agree with the position outlined in the motion." (Dkt. 255) - The night before, prosecutors called Chainalysis's counsel. The judge asked point-blank: "Did you let them know that they were potentially subject to investigation or prosecution?" The answer: "We have discussed at a high level some of the issues surrounding the relayer with Chainalysis." (Dkt. 259) - The Chainalysis witness took the Fifth. My lawyers learned about that call only afterward, from Chainalysis's own lawyer. (Dkt. 263) The jury never heard any of it. This spring, at the Bitcoin 2026 conference in Las Vegas, something happened that I still can't quite believe. The Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, and the FBI Director, Kash Patel, sat on a panel called "Code is Free Speech." Think about that. The two top law enforcement officials in the country. Blanche told thousands of developers: if you're a coder and you're not the one committing the crime, "you are not going to be investigated and not going to be charged." He said the last administration's crypto cases were "outrageous attacks on the industry." Patel praised "the Chainalysises of the world" as FBI partners. And when the moderator pointed at the elephant in the room, my case, Tornado Cash, Roman Storm, the Acting Attorney General called it a "lingering case" they are "continuing to deal with." So here is my hypothetical question. If code is free speech, why am I still being prosecuted for writing it? And if the Chainalysises of the world are the partners, the same Chainalysis that ran its own Tornado Cash relayer and earned fees from Tornado Cash users, while I never did, why is it off the hook? They made an example out of a developer for writing code. Their own vendor ran the same infrastructure, pocketed the fees, and got a phone call instead of a prosecution. Sources 👇👇👇
73
422
1,686
391,246
The only thing beating Bitcoin right now is NVDA but even it cannot win against runaway inflation. It's only a matter of time.
103
If I was an attacker, the easiest way to steal funds would be to sell a "Bitcoin Hardware Wallet".
2
69
The S&P 500 is down over 72% this decade (in BTC terms). Will it ever recover?
59
So now that my distrust of hardware wallets has been vindicated, will anyone listen to my next prediction? A hardware maker will add hidden malware to steal your coins, one day sweep everyone's funds, and the CEO will disappear without a trace.
1
96
If Bitcoin Maximalists were a little more louder, we wouldn't have trusted bad RNG. But the louder we get, the crazier people say we are. "Too extreme" they said. Until it's too late. A lot of the smartest folks have gone silent from the pressure. And that's unfortunate.
1
115
ビットコイン⚡ retweeted
The Federal Reserve should not exist. Not only is it unconstitutional, it's incredibly immoral. The Fed also strives to do the impossible -- successfully plan the economy by price fixing interest rates and counterfeiting currency. The entire goal is a fool's errand, and it doesn't matter how "educated" or "qualified," those who are employed at the Fed are. No human being is educated enough or qualified to do the impossible. And so, the whole house of cards, known as the Federal Reserve, must ultimately fall. And they're well on their way to succeeding at that. Watch @RonPaul & @ChrisRossini below:
Federal Reserve: Meet The New Boss, Same As The Old Boss nitter.net/i/broadcasts/1wxWjjNak…
208
1,795
8,819
136,542
ビットコイン⚡ retweeted
Owning a little Bitcoin isn't risky. Not owning any of the potential reserve money of the future is what's recklessly risky.
9
166
760
ビットコイン⚡ retweeted
- You: "My stocks went up 10%." - Government: "Congratulations! That's taxable." - You: "But inflation was 8%. I only really gained 2%." - Government: "We tax the full 10%." - You: "You tax the inflation you created?" - Government: "Capital gains are capital gains." - You: "So you profit from debasing my money twice?" - Government: "You're not an economist."
220
3,049
20,864
573,651
Those on the other side of government “currency” own us all, and we are nothing more than livestock to them. Bitcoin is the biggest jailbreak in human history.
My own belief, which I've said many times, is that there's a structure outside of what we see. Trillionaires. Ancient ones, not Elon and his stock. Sovereign wealth behind our comprehension. They let "Mossad" take the heat, it's a shell game. The real power is unseen.
24
26
362
37,049
As long as people use the word Crypto instead of Bitcoin, we're still very early.
1
1
1
254
A man’s obligations in marriage can be compelled A woman’s obligations can never be compelled Bad deal By design, of course
36
86
1,590
28,540
Bitcoin is designed to outlast countries, and yet you judge it by the credit created out of thin air by such countries? It's the first forever-asset. Gold bars and land are not safe against war or a nation's collapse. Bitcoin is seriously misunderstood and underrated.
232
Every Bitcoin downturn hardens it by removing impurities such as weak hands and leverage. It only accepts real work and real conviction. The froth is weak but the foundation is insanely solid due to maximalists. We know the line only by testing it.
200
The USD has recently gone up but based on the fundamentals of inflation, it will inevitably go back down against BTC the hardest digital gold.
1
114
ビットコイン⚡ retweeted
For 5,000 years, money always had a master. Kings. Empires. Central banks. Bureaucrats. Different names. Same control. Then Bitcoin showed up in 2009. Money with no ruler. So when people call it a scam, what they’re really saying is they haven’t studied the first true monetary revolution in human history.
25
90
404
8,706
ビットコイン⚡ retweeted
$MSTR will do better than $SPCX. SpaceX at a $2T valuation means a 10x requires swallowing $20T of GDP basically demanding that space-based AI data centers and point-to-point global logistics replace terrestrial infrastructure entirely. Meanwhile, MSTR can 10x if Bitcoin goes to $300K and $STRC does okay. One requires a complete sci-fi rewriting of global economics. The other just requires regular monetary debasement.
4
4
62
5,958
ビットコイン⚡ retweeted
Normies think Bitcoin is risky while male sperm counts have cratered over 50% since the 1970s from microplastics, seed oils, SSRIs, porn, and endocrine disruptors in literally everything, fertility clinics have waitlists longer than the DMV, and the political solution is to import millions more people every year to keep the GDP ponzi running instead of fixing the money that makes having kids financially suicidal. Bitcoin is the only asset that might let your actual bloodline continue without government breeding subsidies. Opt out of this absolute madness
11
31
251
9,337
If you held Bitcoin through its winter, you earned it.
92