RWA tokens

The Innovation Exemption is the new CLARITY. The SEC’s Innovation Exemption opens a new pathway for tokenized U.S. stocks to trade onchain. Injective has built the infrastructure with the regulatory rails needed for RWAs and tokenized securities to thrive. We welcome the @SECGov’s framework, which provides temporary, conditional relief for qualifying onchain trading venues while preserving investor protections and the rights attached to the underlying shares. For American builders and institutions, this creates a concrete path to advance tokenized markets under existing law while longer-term rules take shape. Injective already brings critical capabilities to this opportunity: → SEC-registered transfer agent. Our affiliate, Injective Institutional Services, is an SEC-registered transfer agent, enabling it to maintain official securities ownership records onchain. This makes Injective the only layer-1 blockchain capable of hosting its own regulated securities onchain. → Injective Mint. The upcoming platform gives institutional issuers a single interface to create and manage assets, define eligible holders and enforce transfer restrictions directly onchain, without writing custom contracts. → Regulatory approvals for $INJ INJ today is one of the only assets to have CFTC-regulated futures. INJ is also in the final stages of gaining public ETFs. → Infrastructure built for RWA markets. Injective combines these capabilities with programmable financial infrastructure designed for sub-second settlement, giving institutions tools to build around the operational requirements of tokenized securities. This work has advanced alongside our engagement with policymakers. At the Injective Summit in Washington, D.C., U.S. Senators, Members of Congress and industry leaders came together around advancing regulatory clarity and strengthening America’s leadership in financial innovation. The SEC’s action moves that ambition forward, giving responsible innovators a practical pathway to continue building as the broader regulatory framework develops. We see the Innovation Exemption as an opportunity to connect this infrastructure to a new generation of regulated stock markets. Issuance, ownership records and trading need to work together. Injective was built in America from day one. We welcome rules that give institutions and developers like us a concrete path to build here in the heart of America. Our focus remains clear: enable everyone worldwide to access and create onchain assets. It’s time for us to create true financial freedom for all. Accelerate 🇺🇸

We’re excited to announce that Ondo Finance’s subsidiary Oasis Pro Markets, a U.S. registered broker-dealer, has joined DTCC’s Fund/SERV. Ondo Finance is the first tokenization company to join the network, which processes over 85% of the U.S. mutual fund transaction activity. What joining Fund/SERV unlocks: 1️⃣ Connectivity with fund companies, wealth platforms & service providers 2️⃣ Standardized transaction processing, reconciliation, distributions & reporting 3️⃣ One connection replaces fund-by-fund integrations, enabling tokenized funds to scale across the traditional financial ecosystem Talia Klein, Managing Director and Head of Wealth & Investment Solutions at DTCC: “Ondo’s participation in Fund/SERV demonstrates how established industry infrastructure can support the next phase of market evolution.” With this interoperability between traditional and digital finance, the infrastructure is now in place for tokenized funds to scale toward mainstream adoption.

Tokenized capital markets are growing rapidly. Each dShare™ by Dinari is backed by a security held with licensed custodians, and is designed to preserve cash dividends, redemption at NBBO, and a claim on backing securities. Higher.

USDC is expanding its role across tokenized capital markets. Eligible investors can now use USDC to purchase dShares™ across 724 tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs through @DinariGlobal via supported self-custody wallets, with the option to receive cash dividends in USDC. dinari.com/blog/dinari-enabl…

I agree that we should be careful about creating unintended incentives, but I disagree with the idea that running a validator should inherently be incentivized based on how much promotion or onboarding that validator does. To me, running a validator is first and foremost about securing a network you believe in. If it’s profitable, great—that’s a bonus. But if we believe in TX and want the chain to succeed, bringing new users into the ecosystem should be the goal. Period. Not only bringing them in when it directly benefits our own validator. Not everyone has the time or resources to spend hours onboarding, hosting Spaces, creating content, etc. Some people support the network by owning a validator, covering the costs, and helping secure the chain. That contribution still matters. And speaking only for myself, hitting a cap would not suddenly make me stop onboarding people to TX. I’m not going to say, “Well, @DEGENLABS_CO can’t gain any more voting power, so I’m done growing the ecosystem.” That’s simply not going to happen. I regularly host Spaces with other validators and have done so many times where the DegenLabs validator benefited the least from the conversation. And I genuinely don’t care. Would I love to see us grow? Obviously. But I’m also happy when my counterparts grow because the ecosystem growing is the point. I also regularly advocate for smaller validators that contribute to TX. Maybe they don’t contribute in exactly the same way you or I do, but they still contribute. And I know plenty of validators who are actively growing and moving up the rankings while still educating people about proper staking distribution and encouraging delegators to look beyond themselves. That’s healthy behavior. And I think there’s an important real-world example here: look at how much the top validator has continued to grow. Where is that validator in the community? Not here, from what I see. Yet it continues growing. That tells me there is an underlying problem that has very little to do with who is working the hardest to onboard users. The problem, in my opinion, has always been education and concentration. New users naturally gravitate toward the top validators because they don’t know any better. That creates increasingly top-heavy voting power, potential network-security implications—which we’ve already seen become relevant during situations like the chain halt—and a governance problem when 3 validators out of 53 can effectively determine whether a proposal passes or fails. Those are legitimate issues that need to be addressed. I don’t particularly want to tell anyone who they can or cannot stake with. Ideally, education and better staking distribution would solve this organically. But we also can’t pretend the current level of concentration is healthy simply because some validators worked harder than others to grow. If a cap isn’t the right solution, fair enough. Then let’s participate in these conversations and find a better one. But I don’t think “I contribute more, therefore I should be entitled to more voting power” is the answer either. The goal should be a successful, secure, decentralized TX ecosystem—and all of us should want to keep building toward that whether the next delegation lands on our validator or someone else’s. Side note…you are doing a hell of a job on boarding! Keep it up! 💞👏🏻🟢

‼ this proves our point 100%. 2 of the top 3 validators have voted to VETO a community led community crowdfunded proposal and punish those who contributed the 50,000 tx for the proposal to be voted on. VETO is supposed to be for frivolous or scammy proposals. not 'because it won't do enough to solve the problem'

Tokenized stocks are coming to Sei. Dinari's dShares cover more than 700 equities, including the entire S&P 500. The world's deepest equity market, on the blockchain for trading. More from @TokenRelations:

And another one gone, and another one gone, another one bites the dust. $TX tx.solonation.io/validators/…

tx:native got even faster 🔥🔥🔥 Block time = .80s 🚀🚀🚀 smartmemetoken.com/rwamart