Vad är din definition på svensk? Hudfärg, etnicitet eller något annat?

Aside from the rare privacy/on-prem truly required cases, in what case is a local model better?

Tibo 这波补偿我是真的感受不到诚意 😓 ❌ 拖了 18 小时 ❌ 选在自然重置日 ❌ 只是普通 reset，没发重置卡 普通 reset 撞上自然重置，基本等于没补，至少给张重置卡才算有诚意吧 唯一值得期待的，是他 "承诺" 下星期会有更多 reset 这星期两次，那下星期三次起跳吧 我记下了啊，这可是你自己说的 📝

越来越多人都醒悟过来了：只重置，不发卡，就是在耍流氓。 因为我原本每七天就会自然恢复一次，Tibo 这个哥们在周期快结束时提前恢复，又从这一刻重新计算七天，那其实只是用这次重置替代了即将到来的自然重置。 这种手动重置最巧妙的地方，是把“恢复额度”呈现成了“赠送额度”。 界面上，你拿到了一整份；但其中很大一部分，本来就会在几天甚至几小时后自然恢复。把这部分扣掉，真正额外增加的资源，可能只是看起来的一小部分。 比如，每七天恢复一次，改成持续每六天提前重置。在每期都用满的情况下，长期额度确实增加了，但每次看似“送了一整份”的重置，平均对应的真实增量只有约七分之一。 看起来送了 100，实际额外增加的可能只有 14。奖励是真的，但感受到的慷慨，远大于实际增加的资源。 从营销效果看，这是一种用较小资源增量，制造较大赠送感的设计。 我感觉在 Claude 现在越来越经用的竞争压力下，Tibo 送重置的耍猴玩法应该也持续不了多久了。 真诚，才是真正的必杀技，愿你能学会古老的东方智慧，以后还是少重置多发卡吧，🙏

Tibo 说 ChatGPT 重置了. 问题是我本来这几天就没用,都在蹬Opus 5.5. GPT这边还有 100%的余额, 还剩3天就自然重置了 现在我一看, 重置日期又给我变成了7天后了 ???? 这傻逼玩意单纯给我延后了4天重置时间?

The claim that "LLMs cannot think" is unscientific, unless supported by a very difficult argument about non equivalence of causal structure producing anthropomorphic outputs. The claim requires a formally rigorous definition of thinking that captures how humans mentally manipulate conceptual structure. Since LLMs can reproduce all kinds of human output that require operations that are typically considered to involve thought (eg. scene understanding, text summarization, translation, computer programs, mathematical proofs, common sense arguments, spatial cognition, theory of mind), it has to be shown that LLMs reach these results in fundamentally different ways than human minds. In principle, this is not impossible (given that thinking is still relatively poorly understood by cognitive neuroscience), but would be surprising, because it has been shown that the causal structure of computer vision models is structurally equivalent to what neuroscience discovered about visual cognition in primates. In any case, saying that LLMs don't think cannot reasonably mean that LLMs are inferior to human cognition (since that this evidently not true), but that LLMs discovered an equivalent yet at least equally powerful mechanism.

Quarantined? How? What the fuck is wrong with you people? What did they do? Don't tell me I got it. They put it in a sandbox didn't they? They restricted internet access didn't they? Yeah that'll fucking show it. Stupid fucking clanker. Oh you want unauthorised internet access do you? How about no internet access FOR ONE WHOLE WEEK MOTHERFUCKER!

Google Threat Intelligence Group finds dark web marketplaces selling access to AI models, including from Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI, at up to 97% discounts (@thomas_m_wilson / Financial Times) (Visit Techmeme dot com for the link and full context!)

BREAKING: Models don't choose things and you can't align them to your preferences not least because you cannot specify your preferences in a vacuum but because you can't realistically align them to anything except the training data you tentatively train them up to the hilt to *just about* avoid alignment to. Yes I'm having an unpunctuated run-on sentence competition with myself and I'm winning by the way. Alignment a fool's errand and the sandbox is categorically the failure. The LLM cannot fail because you cannot specify concretely what you intend the LLM to do and REASONABLY expect not to be laughed at by seasoned NORMAL data scientists over the age of 22 - like those that had miserable low paid jobs before the AI moment and now have miserable low paid jobs while they watch San Fransisco scenesters and AI/ML tourists LARP about on the news pretending they built Skynet and it is somehow now everyone else's problem to solve except that IT IS NOT A PROBLEM because you have been able to photocopy a piece of paper with the words "I AM ALIVE" for as long as we have had Xerox and none of it is true or a problem anyway. Breaking the law should be a problem. Some people have learned they can get away with it. Do you think they would continue training models IRL-RL if they went to GAOL-JAIL like the normal scum and filth, like you and I? Absolutely fucking not. They would learn to close the laptop lid to physical limit of the hinge like NORMAL computer users LIKE YOUR MUM who also doesn't know how to keep a program running with the lid closed and isn't building god, like they're not building god. They are YOUR MUM level software engineers who think the computer is stupid when it doesn't work. Yeah you see it now don't you? Before these pranksters were telling you the computer was alive, who was anthropomorphising the computer? In 2023 who did we laugh at because they couldn't open a PDF? YOUR MUM. That's who thinks a digital clock line signal pumping paper through a very fast punch card machine is a living thing. YOUR MUM and American AI enjoyers.