"Kaspa hasn't failed, it's just that no one uses it." I've heard this for three years, and the goalposts keep moving every time the evidence changes. Kaspa did 95,256 transactions in the last 24 hours. 38,000 unique addresses sent them. Real activity, not a testnet, on a fair launched, no premine, proof of work L1 most of crypto twitter still treats like a joke. So genuinely, what number changes your mind? A million transactions a day? A specific market cap? I don't think there's an actual threshold, because the conclusion was decided first and the argument got built backward from there. Meanwhile builders keep shipping. KaChat's social layer makes every post, like, and follow a real transaction, a micro fee that doubles as spam protection since bots would have to pay the miners securing the chain just to flood it. Nodes sync in under an hour on decent hardware. Coffee to a car, gift cards through Coinsbee, merchants tracked openly through KasMap. That's what adoption looks like happening in public instead of promised on a roadmap. I'm not asking anyone to blindly trust a number on a screen. I'm asking for consistency: if 38,000 daily unique senders doesn't count, say what does, and apply that same bar everywhere. kaspa:native