Guard Fires Gun During Tussle Over Recording Device
1,240
776
8,987
663,866
Replying to @omoelerinjare1
Guard was fully justified as the man started attacking the guard.

Sep 25, 2026 · 11:54 AM UTC

54
1
74
11,578
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Who started it? The guy who grabbed the camera started it.
32
407
Bull shit! I completely support our law enforcement officers, but this guy was not armed. He obviously has no weapon, and there was absolutely no reason for the officer to have fired his damn sidearm in a room full of people! At the most, a taser should have been deployed. Realistically, 3 officers should not have needed to deploy anything at all in that room. Furthermore, the entire situation would have been avoided had they simply let the man speak. That’s all he was doing! Instead, two officers walked straight into the room and started to grab him, out of nowhere. What am I missing here? What caused the escalation? It certainly didn’t seem to be the guy who was freaking shot at!
3
35
468
The guard assaulted him first
22
194
He started trying to take the man’s stuff so he escalated the situation. It’s on the guard
16
207
Really? That’s what you saw? You missed the part where the security tried to snatch his camera?
12
221
The guard laid his hands on the man first. The guard got what was coming to him, and should be in prison for 25 years for discharging a firearm in a place where firearms aren't allowed
17
159
Maybe the guard shouldn’t have put his hands on him. Justified force . If you try to steal my equipment get ready for some fists to the face
9
102
The guard walked in, didn't say a single fucking word to him, and straight up putsl hands on him and ripping the camera off his neck. Then so incompetent firing off his gun that shpuld be on saftey in its holder. I might go to jail for defending myself but ill be rich from them
6
64
Hopefully you do not have access to guns. If you do, you’re a danger to society.
6
94
100% guards fault and should get an attempted murder charge.
8
125
There was no mortal threat. There were two deputies and one inept assailant who hits like a girl and bites people. Drawing his gun, much less firing it, wasn't justified at all. Drawing a sidearm is a use of force. In this case it's excessive force and should've been charged.
1
4
45
Your stupid i get it
16
Not how that works. Good luck having that hold up in court. His life wasn’t in danger with 10 others in the room. That dude needs to never carry again if he was that scared.
3
44
The security guard fired his gun and missed from six inches away.
4
39
...you miss the part where the guard assaulted the guy eh?
1
7
32
You missed the pary were the guy trough a barrage if punches the moment he was approached.
16
I don’t know wtf you were watching but the guard grabbed him with both hands. Justified in getting punched. You fucking idiot
5
64
No. Hes a security guard not law enforcement. Those punches were more like grandma hits. Deadly force was not necessary at all. The guard could of easily stood up and subdued him
1
1
41
Why di security guards carry guns? Incase someone attacks yoyr fucking stupid
14
He was asked to stop recording why would he reach for him justified. They so scared with guns. He could’ve punched back not qualified to be a security he looks old anyways
1
35
You can’t shoot someone for punching you lmao all you idiots. In ccw class the teacher you you can only meet a threat with equal justifiable force if he using fist you use fist if he brings a weapon then you have right to use weapon
35
They grabbed him first.
1
18
They approached him and he attacked physically wtf are you retarded?
8
No he could have shot someone else
1
27
Thats a retarded argument. Did anyone else get shot ? Nooooo!
19
Let someone stand over top of you and grab all over you for simply speaking, you’re an idiot. I support the hell outta the cops but you can’t just walk up and start grabbing people and jerking stuff outta their hands because you don’t like their words.
8
Call yourself a “warrior” in your profile but supporting a man shooting another man that isn’t armed. A “warrior” would’ve fought back without a weapon. If you lose then you lose. Take the beating like a man.. You are not a warrior you are a coward.
28
So anyone who cant fight ahould fire his gun????
5
How do you know who the guy is, and why were they hiding their identitys. That was the entire reason why the guy was upset and the people were having that meeting. And why would they need firearms when all the people in the meeting went through metal detectors?
12
The man was fully justified as the guard started attacking him to take his personal private property. Think about it 🤔
7
Dude ! The guard attack him first.
3
Bs he touched him first
43
The guard attacked him first.
17
The guard literally grabbed him first
4
Only a fucking retard shoots a gun in a crowded room because a scrawny old guy is throwing pillow punches. Use some common fucking sense dumbass
8
90