Strength Coach, former Little League MVP. Link below for more thoughful, longer form articles on Substack

Achieving The Standards 1.0 - 135 press, 225 bench, 315 squat, 405 deadlift - is more important and useful than getting down to 10% bodyfat and it's not even close.
212
159
5,368
562,727
This is a great post, not only for the local information and explanation of training splits, but in a broader sense, because it is the rare post in this algorithm that shows an understanding of how someone’s level of training advancement plays a role in what works best for him
Bro split vs Regular split vs Full body Missed this discourse a few days ago -- here is my take (this is how I structure programs for clients). First, they all work. Any properly designed training program that utilizes repeated workouts and progressive overload will "work". But which should YOU do? If I have a rank beginner, I'm going with a 3 day per week full body workout. Chest every day. Back every day. Shoulders every day. Legs every day. Arms every day. But every body part is "touched" 3 times per week. You do not need much training stimulus to grow if you're a beginner. And you will grow faster hitting body parts 3 times per week and spreading 10-12 sets per body part out among those 3 workouts. Plus, you are a beginner; you will not be lifting super heavy, you will not accumulate enough CNS fatigue to warrant an upper/lower or a 4 day split, let alone a typical 5 day bro split. If I have someone who is an intermediate - they've been lifting awhile and have a decent base and an established gym routine - I go with a 4 day split. Sometimes upper lower, but I personally like mixing it up a bit. Chest/shoulders/tris twice per week. Legs/back/bis twice per week. These workouts work REALLY well for people who have been doing full body, 3 day per week splits or bro-splits before they're ready for them. They seem to hit hard, and since you're spreading your 10-12 sets per body part out over 2 workouts per week, you have ample time to recover as the CNS is being fatigued more intensely. Now... IF you are a highly seasoned gym rat - meaning you've been religiously training 3-4 times per week for at least 4-5 years... AND you request to train 5 days per week... Then you're getting a proper bro split or a 5 Day PPL split, most likely. The 5 Day PPL is Push-Pull-Legs-Push-Pull. Or Pull-Legs-Push-Pull-Legs. Something like that. The Bro Split is the typical Back/Chest/Shoulders/Hamstring Dominant/Quad Dominant type split. But those splits - the Bro Split - are unnecessary until you're at the point where you can't recover from a full body workout AND you need a lot of recovery (over 72 hours between body parts). So yes, there's a place for Bro Splits. And PPL Splits. And U/L Splits. And Full Body Splits. But imo, you want to do: Full Body Split (beginner) 4 Day UL OR 4 Day Muscle Group (next) 5-6 Day PPL or Bro Split (advanced) ... to get the best results. And don't try to move too quickly between those options above. Milk the stage you are at thoroughly before moving to the next stage.
1
1
15
2,542
When a lift gets stuck, the answer is examining then fixing the fundamentals much more often than a 'hack.' Example: your bench stalls out and hasn't budged in a while. Common hacks: this exercise for triceps, that exercise for power off the chest, this exercise for back because "big back big bench," this video about 'bending the bar' by guy who benches 600, etc... 99% of the time, these are taking the person in the wrong direction. Not because they are inherently bad or wrong, but because they don't address the problem of the person who is stuck. They confuse the needs of advanced lifters who a) already have their basic ducks in a row, and b) are already very strong, with the needs of the 99%, who are novices and early intermediates and don't even know what the ducks are, much less have them in a row. 1. Basic programming: Is your programming suitable for your level of training advancement - does it have a reasonable combination of sets, reps, and weight/intensity and a plan for regular progress/PRs based on whether you're a novice, early intermediate, intermediate, late intermediate, or advanced lifter? 2.Basic technique - shockingly often, people don't have the basics of technique down. Triceps exercise X and power off the chest exercise Y and special bend the bar technique Z aren't needed for people who lack basic strength and technique. Just learn how to do the basic movement correctly first, then get stronger at it. 3. Little things - rest between sets, weight jumps, recovery. Heavy sets often require much more rest than people take. Not every workout for your whole life will require this, but many will. Ah but you don't have that kind of time. Fair enough, some don't. But if you're taking 3 minutes maximum between your heaviest sets on big structural lifts, you’re going to leave a lot of strength on the table. Weight jumps - 5 lb increases on a 115 press or 185 bench are actually a pretty significant percentage increase. 1-2.5 lb jumps are often more appropriate. Microplates are now widely available. Get some and use them. Recovery - mainly nutrition, are you eating a) enough, b) enough protein, and c) in close enough proximity to your workout? But also things like sleep and external stressors play a role. All of these things should be evaluated and corrected before you worry about any hacks. Almost every time I see someone post about getting stuck, the replies are full of hacks instead of evaluating and fixing the basics. Let's change that.
1
4
38
5,124
Saw a bumper sticker yesterday that said, "This vehicle makes frequent stops at your mom's house." We're so back
1
36
1,178
This is a great description of close grip bench Regular bench will be about a hand width wider and less elbow tuck (but still about 20-30 degrees of tuck from a straight flare)
Replying to @4PC1982
Way too narrow. I like right about shoulder width, elbows super tight to your body, like you’re holding the newspaper under your armpits.
4
36
7,062
Those are the approximate positions you want for generally adaptive training purposes. Hyper specialists might use a narrower close grip bench for triceps, or a wider regular bench for powerlifting, but 99% of people will do best with the generally adaptive version. And if you wonder why some powerlifters bench so much with DYEL upper bodies, it’s usually a combo of the wide grip + big arch.
1
4
424
It’s funny because it’s true
6
1
99
1,804
Still Fat, still pink, but getting a little less weak again. Currently doing DB incline bench third in the workout after bench press and lat pulldowns, so pretty happy with this 120x10 top set with gas in the tank.
9
123
11,176
I have coached thousands of people across probably over a million deadlift reps, almost all of whom use a mixed grip when it gets too heavy for double overhand, and not a single one has torn a bicep due to a mixed grip. Outside of truly outlandishly bad form (bent elbows), most people don't lift heavy enough for this to be a concern. The main issue is lifting with bent elbows and having the weight forcibly straighten them out at some point in the movement when the biceps is no longer strong enough to hold the bend with that much weight. This is exacerbated by lifting with a 'grip it and rip it' style that jerks the weight off the floor. Could this issue theoretically happen to someone who doesn't do either of these things, who uses good form? At a sufficiently heavy weight (probably 600+ but at least 500) - yes, but it's an astronomically low chance. At weights most people use, you're about as likely to win the lottery. That said, if you as a normal person still want to use straps instead of a mixed grip, it's not the end of the world. Just don't die on the hill of "I'll only lift what I can hold with a double overhand grip," because that will severely limit your gains. A hook grip solves the problem but isn't suitable for everyone. A mixed grip solves the problem and if you care enough to learn and use good form, will 99.999% not be a problem. If you're still worried about that 0.001%, use straps. But let's not pretend this is a bigger issue than it is, just because social media makes us think rare events with known avoidable causes are happening left and right.
9
43
2,420
The argument I see sometimes is that all lifting is contrived in that we couldn’t do it in nature without this modern, manufactured equipment, so as long as everything is contrived anyway, no lift has a better claim on being more useful than another for general training purposes. So you should just do either what you enjoy or what’s best for your goals, and not think of any individual lift as inherently indispensable. There’s some truth to this for those who are already reasonably developed but it misses an important part of the picture that Sara articulates here. Basic barbell lifts - squat, deadlift, press, bench press - are not just some contrived lift like any other. They are how we figured out to ergonomically load the most basic, fundamental human movement patterns that are stable enough to be heavily loadable so as to produce a high or maximal force production event, but still working within the context of the normal gravity based environment that we operate within in real life. They have unique characteristics that do actually make them more important and useful than other lifts within a certain context. This doesn’t mean you need to become a powerlifter or that you need to work on increasing your 1 RM on these lifts forever without branching out into any other things, but it does mean that they have uniquely efficient properties that are especially good for building your base, or for being the core of a program for people who aren’t hardcore lifters and just want to get the most out of a small and simple commitment.
Training for “longevity” - to me - is staying strong & capable across the basic human movement patterns. The squat, bench, deadlift, overhead press, etc aren’t just big dumb gym bro exercises. Those are all ways that humans should be able to move naturally & if they can’t, that is when injuries occur. Cannot tell u how many conversations I’ve had with people who hurt their back bending over to pick up kids or tie shoes. My mom, for example, was driving and hurt her shoulder when she reached in the back seat to grab her idk ~5 lb purse. She ended up having to get surgery on it! Deadlifts strengthen ur back to allow u to bend, presses strengthen ur shoulders to allow u to reach, squats strengthen ur knees & legs to allow u to sit & stand & walk, etc. Basic strength training is the best longevity training there is imo
1
2
35
3,701
Deep Squats, Shallow Thoughts retweeted
Guys, sometimes shit hurts just because. Every ache and pain isn’t an indication of a catastrophic injury about to happen. If it feels better as you warm up, you’ll probably be fine. Cowboy tf up.
24
15
299
12,342
Strength tests draw a misleading, somewhat arbitrary, binary between a state of being strong and not being strong. You can be kind of strong, a little bit strong, or almost strong, or maybe strong, and still test positive for strength. Strength tests, particularly home gym tests, capture a moment in time at which an motor unit has activated and is interfacing with the weight in some way. “We define how we understand the beginning of strength based on this snapshot, but such a freeze-frame contains limited information,” Angus McWeak writes. Read more about the difficult task of determining when strength actually begins:
Pregnancy tests draw a misleading, somewhat arbitrary, binary between a state of being pregnant and not being pregnant. You can be kind of pregnant, a little bit pregnant, or almost pregnant, or maybe pregnant, and still test positive for pregnancy. Pregnancy tests, particularly at-home urine tests, capture a moment in time at which an embryo has implanted and is interfacing with the uterus in some way. “We define how we understand the beginning of pregnancy based on this snapshot, but such a freeze-frame contains limited information,” Apoorva Tadepalli writes. Read more about the difficult task of determining when pregnancy actually begins: newyorkermag.visitlink.me/Q9…
4
20
2,148
Sydney Sweeney didn't set women's sports back 100 years or whatever the latest stupidity is, but you will personally set men's progress back 100 years by not getting your press to 135, your bench to 225, your squat to 315, and your deadlift to 405.
5
15
227
4,032
Deep Squats, Shallow Thoughts retweeted
In a world of constant distraction, shooting and weightlifting are two of the rare places where you can still be completely present. And its wonderful. To outsiders, shooting probably seems like the least serene activity imaginable. You have this loud, deadly device in your hands. It explodes inches from your face, kicks back against you, and sends a projectile screaming downrange. But once you get over all that, shooting becomes unbelievably peaceful. At the range, your world becomes now. You settle your breathing. You watch the sights move and learn not to fight every tiny movement. You feel your grip, your stance, the pressure of the trigger. You let the sights settle, press the shot without disturbing the gun, then stay with them through recoil and recovery. All of it demands that you be in the present, and that is incredibly calming. There is no past. There is no future. There is no work BS, no notifications, no argument you had yesterday, no problem waiting for you tomorrow. There is only this breath, this sight picture, this trigger press, this shot. You are just trying to put the bullet exactly where you want it, as cleanly and efficiently as you can. Heavy weightlifting puts you in the same place. I mean getting underneath a heavy compound lift for five or fewer heavy reps. You put your hands on the bar and immediately the world contracts again. This is going to be heavy. And once heavy becomes normal, there is something peaceful about that too. There is nothing abstract about a heavy weight. You feel the knurling dig into your hands, the bar across your back, the pressure through your feet. You brace. You breathe. Every bit of force and concentration becomes clean and simple because it has one purpose. Grug do full ugga. Rock goes up. For those few seconds, nothing else exists. You cannot really worry about some BS tomorrow in the middle of a heavy lift. The load does not allow multitasking. There is no abstraction when full ugga and rock go up. The moment demands everything you have right now. Then you lock it out. You got it. You rack the weight. There is this wonderful little moment afterward when you realize you gave something your complete focus and hit the target, whether that target was a weight or a spot on a paper target at the range. Maybe that is why both activities feel so satisfying these days. Modern life constantly fractures your attention. Shooting and lifting refuse to let it. For a little while, you are not thinking about your life, planning your life, worrying about your life, or abstracting your life. You are just livin' it, man.
9
12
101
3,284
Interviewer: “Can you live without deadlifts?” O’Hearn: “No, no absolutely not. There’s just exercises that keep you healthy and it has nothing to do with bodybuilding or powerlifting - it just keeps you healthy. And deadlifts are one of those exercises.”
36
16
355
37,473
One of the most common issues polluting and stupidizing discourse on this topic is the extremely common tendency to make everything try to fit into the categories of bodybuilding or powerlifting.
2
30
2,260
The guy who doesn't compete in BB (and even some who do), would be better off being a little more of a generalist instead of filtering all his training decisions through the same absolutist optimization filter as if he were prepping for Mr. O. The guy who doesn't compete in PL (and even most who do) would also be better off being a little more of a generalist and after the novice or early intermediate phase is over, start incorporating some cardio and lifts other than basic barbell lifts.
2
21
1,778
As per this picture - Everyone used to develop a base roughly the same way, at least in the same ballpark, whether they ended up going into powerlifting, bodybuilding, strongman, or even track and field events like shot put. Everyone started out natty, and getting big and strong on the basics for a while. The real specificity came later, along with the small % who'd go on to become enhanced. And even after there was some specificty, there was still enough overlap to train together, as we see here in this pic. This was still basically the way things were when I started training. The recent ubiquity of gear availability, plus its constant promotion on social media, has made it such that guys can skip those early steps and think they know what they're doing. They rely on gear to carry their bad programming, and never actually learn how to train, never learn what works for them - because everything works for them - and get on PEDs well before they have the mental capacity to truly consider such a decision or do the necessary research about safety and responsibility. We all see it online. Many of us see it at the gym now too. It's led to a degradation of subtle but real parts of what made physical culture great.
Replying to @wolfstrength
Why I always loved 70s powerlifters and bodybuilders. They trained together. Got strong together. Just 1 group dieted and the other didn’t. Both looked yoked.
6
3
38
12,861
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Gains
18
26
406
16,816
One of the key features of this entire ideology is its lack of consistent application of any universal principles Whatever is the most destructive to western norms and society in the moment is utilized So for example, normally, in such a situation, 11 white people trying to bully a lone black person would be an arch example of racism, white privilege, all that stuff we hear all the time But that’s not what the other side - the side that is defending Clancy - does here. Here they choose a different form of their oppressed/oppressor narrative. Because Lindsay Clancy is the primary focal point of The Oppressed here, the person around who this particular form of societal destruction has to revolve, the script has to be flipped, and we suddenly ignore the racial axis that would usually be placed front and center, and instead solely make it about the oppressor / oppressed narrative on the basis of sex and the unique mental health challenges of womanhood But now notice how they will give THAT narrative up in an instant when talking about men who identify as women. They don’t have any of those hormones, but somehow are granted all of the status and oppressed category of women, and even more. A trans woman definitionally cannot experience these hormonal issues and yet are held up as literal women who should be able to play in women’s sports, use women’s locker rooms, and all the rest Suddenly the importance of the femalehood axis of oppression is abandoned as soon as that becomes more convenient for undermining western civilization So you can see how the pattern works. There’s never any consistent principle you can ever pin them down on, because they always shift to whatever narrative lever is convenient in the moment, and that’s why arguing with them often feels like trying to nail jelly to a wall It also shows how they don’t actually care about any of the specific issues they use as undermining levers, just the end result of civilizational undermining, so the Normies who sometimes do care about some of those particular issues and are taken in by their rhetoric , are being played badly
NEW: Lindsay Clancy juror Paula Devlin reveals on 'CBS Mornings' that the lone, male holdout juror who voted to find Clancy guilty of murdering her children was the *only* person of color -- a black man. The 11 not-guilty jurors -- who hectored him for a week to cave -- were all white.
6
3
53
2,934