Stuck at that 115 score, need more followers 😅 How many points did your X score increase by last time?

Have you noticed something? Not tested Opus 5.5 personally yet, gonna do later today.

Creators spend too much time creating content and not enough time building distribution. Yeah, content can be great. But if nobody sees it - or the wrong people see it - brands won’t pay for it. For creators, distribution is part of the product, as well as for brands. That’s why networking, community building, and getting into the right circles will often take you further than learning how to write the perfect tweet. Great content matters. But great content without distribution is just great content nobody sees.

The best time to install the X Score extension is right now.

Have you tried stopping posting and then resuming in two weeks? Did your reach and engagement improve or decline after this pause?

We're building Oznaka after 10 years of solving distribution, running 90+ creator campaigns with 120,000 activated creators, and hearing about the same challenges from 500+ teams working with creators: - inflated accounts that look fine and convert nothing - same names selected for campaigns - weeks lost to manual vetting There is another way

Building connections isn't follow4follow. It’s genuine interest in topics and the people who cover them, whether or not they follow you back.

Reputation and attention data are becoming inputs that AI agents can query and use directly, not just dashboards humans can check. A new generation of tools for marketers is already being built around that.

Name a tool every Influencer Marketing Manager needs on X. I'll start: @xscore_tech

Controversial take, wdyt?

Follower count was never the metric. Who's actually watching was.

Don't want to fall for fake accounts? When checking creators or projects, always look at their X Score.

X Score update has started. Some scores are already updated; the rest will follow in the next few days. xscore.tech

Almost every week we hear the same tension from projects: creators want flat fees, brands want CPA. Makes sense on both sides. A project wants outcomes, not likes. But a creator can't control conversion - funnel, product, value - none of that is on them alone. So, I have a question for you, creators: have you ever worked CPA instead of a flat rate per post? How did it go, and why (or why not)?

public presence vs behind the scenes i average 12h a day on telegram - closing deals, lining up integrations, gathering signals for the next era of wallchain all while our main account sits suspended and my personal account gets flooded with bot impressions stay tuned grow fast or die

The Full Personal Brand Monetization Playbook. 📂 Personal Brand ┃ ┣ 📂 Positioning ┃ ┣ 📂 Niche ┃ ┣ 📂 Expertise ┃ ┣ 📂 Unique Point of View ┃ ┣ 📂 Audience Problem ┃ ┣ 📂 Brand Promise ┃ ┗ 📂 Differentiation ┃ ┣ 📂 Profile ┃ ┣ 📂 Name ┃ ┣ 📂 Bio ┃ ┣ 📂 Profile Photo ┃ ┣ 📂 Banner ┃ ┣ 📂 Pinned Post ┃ ┣ 📂 Social Proof ┃ ┗ 📂 CTA ┃ ┣ 📂 Content Strategy ┃ ┣ 📂 Content Pillars ┃ ┣ 📂 Educational Content ┃ ┣ 📂 Personal Stories ┃ ┣ 📂 Opinions ┃ ┣ 📂 Case Studies ┃ ┣ 📂 Industry Insights ┃ ┗ 📂 Promotional Content ┃ ┣ 📂 Content Creation ┃ ┣ 📂 Research ┃ ┣ 📂 Idea Generation ┃ ┣ 📂 Hooks ┃ ┣ 📂 Storytelling ┃ ┣ 📂 Writing ┃ ┣ 📂 Visuals ┃ ┗ 📂 Repurposing ┃ ┣ 📂 Distribution ┃ ┣ 📂 X ┃ ┣ 📂 LinkedIn ┃ ┣ 📂 Newsletter ┃ ┣ 📂 YouTube ┃ ┣ 📂 Podcasts ┃ ┣ 📂 Communities ┃ ┗ 📂 Cross-Platform Content ┃ ┣ 📂 Audience Growth ┃ ┣ 📂 Replies ┃ ┣ 📂 Collaborations ┃ ┣ 📂 Quote Tweets ┃ ┣ 📂 Community Building ┃ ┣ 📂 Strategic Networking ┃ ┣ 📂 Creator Partnerships ┃ ┗ 📂 Viral Loops ┃ ┣ 📂 Trust ┃ ┣ 📂 Consistency ┃ ┣ 📂 Authenticity ┃ ┣ 📂 Transparency ┃ ┣ 📂 Proof of Work ┃ ┣ 📂 Results ┃ ┣ 📂 Testimonials ┃ ┗ 📂 Reputation ┃ ┣ 📂 Community ┃ ┣ 📂 Loyal Followers ┃ ┣ 📂 Inner Circle ┃ ┣ 📂 Telegram / Discord ┃ ┣ 📂 Newsletter Subscribers ┃ ┣ 📂 Events ┃ ┣ 📂 DMs ┃ ┗ 📂 Feedback Loops ┃ ┣ 📂 Networking ┃ ┣ 📂 Founders ┃ ┣ 📂 Investors ┃ ┣ 📂 Creators ┃ ┣ 📂 Operators ┃ ┣ 📂 Decision Makers ┃ ┣ 📂 Potential Clients ┃ ┗ 📂 Industry Leaders ┃ ┣ 📂 Lead Generation ┃ ┣ 📂 Inbound Leads ┃ ┣ 📂 Outbound DMs ┃ ┣ 📂 Content CTAs ┃ ┣ 📂 Lead Magnets ┃ ┣ 📂 Email Capture ┃ ┣ 📂 Referral System ┃ ┗ 📂 CRM ┃ ┣ 📂 Offers ┃ ┣ 📂 Consulting ┃ ┣ 📂 Services ┃ ┣ 📂 Coaching ┃ ┣ 📂 Digital Products ┃ ┣ 📂 Communities ┃ ┣ 📂 Software ┃ ┗ 📂 Events ┃ ┣ 📂 Monetization ┃ ┣ 📂 Sponsorships ┃ ┣ 📂 Brand Deals ┃ ┣ 📂 Affiliates ┃ ┣ 📂 Consulting ┃ ┣ 📂 Courses ┃ ┣ 📂 Subscriptions ┃ ┣ 📂 Paid Communities ┃ ┣ 📂 Products ┃ ┗ 📂 Equity ┃ ┣ 📂 Sales ┃ ┣ 📂 ICP ┃ ┣ 📂 Discovery Calls ┃ ┣ 📂 Qualification ┃ ┣ 📂 Offer Positioning ┃ ┣ 📂 Pricing ┃ ┣ 📂 Objection Handling ┃ ┣ 📂 Closing ┃ ┗ 📂 Follow-Ups ┃ ┣ 📂 Conversion ┃ ┣ 📂 Landing Pages ┃ ┣ 📂 Social Proof ┃ ┣ 📂 Case Studies ┃ ┣ 📂 Clear CTA ┃ ┣ 📂 Email Sequences ┃ ┣ 📂 DM Funnels ┃ ┗ 📂 Retargeting ┃ ┣ 📂 Retention ┃ ┣ 📂 Client Results ┃ ┣ 📂 Customer Success ┃ ┣ 📂 Community Value ┃ ┣ 📂 Upsells ┃ ┣ 📂 Renewals ┃ ┣ 📂 Referrals ┃ ┗ 📂 Long-Term Relationships ┃ ┣ 📂 Systems ┃ ┣ 📂 Content Calendar ┃ ┣ 📂 CRM ┃ ┣ 📂 Analytics ┃ ┣ 📂 SOPs ┃ ┣ 📂 Automation ┃ ┣ 📂 AI Workflows ┃ ┗ 📂 Team Management ┃ ┣ 📂 Metrics ┃ ┣ 📂 Reach ┃ ┣ 📂 Engagement ┃ ┣ 📂 Follower Growth ┃ ┣ 📂 Profile Visits ┃ ┣ 📂 Email Subscribers ┃ ┣ 📂 Qualified Leads ┃ ┣ 📂 Conversion Rate ┃ ┗ 📂 Revenue per Follower ┃ ┣ 📂 Scale ┃ ┣ 📂 Team ┃ ┣ 📂 Content Engine ┃ ┣ 📂 Multiple Platforms ┃ ┣ 📂 Product Ladder ┃ ┣ 📂 Partnerships ┃ ┣ 📂 Licensing ┃ ┗ 📂 Media Company ┃ ┗ 📂 Moats ┣ 📂 Trust ┣ 📂 Reputation ┣ 📂 Distribution ┣ 📂 Community ┣ 📂 Proprietary Audience ┣ 📂 Unique Knowledge ┣ 📂 Network ┣ 📂 Brand Equity ┣ 📂 Content Library ┗ 📂 Relationships

CT has a huge number of excellent content creators who ruin their reputation in literally a single day. All of this happens because of AI-generated replies that immediately stand out in the feed. You go to a profile, see good content and notice replies that make no sense at all. Don't use AI for replies please

how to make creator tokens grow to $100B creator tokens failed for an obvious reason: people dumped why? because others would dump why? because the attention spiral can't last forever and because early joiners are up 100x and nothing stops them from dumping 3 steps to fix it: 1. airdrop to the people who contributed to you socially the most over the last 3 years. e.g. the most influential accounts who followed you earliest, engaged in your convos, etc. (don't confuse this with mindshare farming - this is retrospective, not incentivized, and based on longevity) yes - Ansem already did this in his own way. maybe it worked exactly like I described, but I couldn't find how it was actually done. I doubt it's possible to manually include every valuable contributor. but skipping it has a cost too: many long-time die-hard supporters didn't get in on time they think it's too late, or they don't have enough liquidity. they may be die-hard supporters and still think it's just not a good time to buy. 2. make this list public and updated in real time. so people get judged if they sell - they'd publicly damage their relationship with the creator. this can hold sell pressure even at $100B 3. let other influential people & communities buy and join publicly to benefit: grow their social presence + get boosted staking APY based on how influential their account is. the result: if someone sells, they become an enemy of a massive influential network and put their reputation on the line huge benefit to join, massive risk to sell this can still be implemented for solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump @blknoiz06 happy to contribute if you consider this proposal disclosure: I've never held solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump

How creators are selected for Wallchain Select campaigns: First, we identify the audience that matters for each campaign - prediction markets, trading, DeFi, AI, or whatever niche the project is targeting. We detect which creators have the highest concentration of that niche audience among their followers. Then, among qualified creators, we compare: - how many relevant audiences each creator can reach - how unique that audience is compared to other applicants - content quality, organic engagement, impression rate, # of sponsored posts, and other signals - reply authenticity, whether replies come from real, relevant users rather than inflated accounts or mass-reply farmers - audience overlap with creators already being selected - suggested post rate, CPM, and other efficiency metrics The goal isn't to find "perfect" creators. Perfect accounts don't exist. Even creators who never manipulate metrics can attract bots, engagement farmers, or low-quality followers. The goal is to build the strongest possible creator mix for each campaign. This also means being qualified doesn’t guarantee selection. You can have a relevant audience and strong content, but another creator may reach the same audience at a better price, bring more unique users, or fit the campaign mix better. Every campaign has a limited budget and a limited number of spots. We select the combination of creators our data shows is the best fit for that specific campaign.

New day New week New campaign Already in the app