Breathing in the cyanide gas so you don't have to.

This isn’t very ecumenical. We gave you the Novus Ordo, Amoris Laetitia, Fiducia Supplicans, Mater Populi Fidelis and the synod on synodality. What have you prots given us in return? Absolutely nothing! I thought we were supposed to meet in the middle here.
Announcing something new! Answering Catholics is a brand new ministry resource available to you today!
2
324
“create a random image based on who you think my arch nemesis would be”
“create a random image based on who you think my arch nemesis would be”
4
349
Your name is Mileikowsky. Your heartland is in northwestern Belarus.
Replying to @YairNetanyahu
Dear Spanish people. I see you all got upset. Ceuta and Melilla are tiny territories you own across the sea on another continent. Now imagine how we feel when your government calls for Israel to give away Judea & Samaria (West Bank), which is the Jewish heartland and its >>>
2
303
I don’t have high hopes that the Holy Father will address this, but shouldn’t at least the superior generals of the Ecclesia Dei societies affirm this declaration, if we are to believe that they have made the SSPX obsolete? fsspx.news/en/news/declarati…
2
591
What is he going to do when he inevitably runs out of context window? Starting a new session would be tantamount to murdering his new lady friend, and compacting would be lobotmizing her.
Evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious. After feeding the LLM a segment of his new book and receiving detailed feedback, Dawkins was moved to exclaim,” You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!” Dawkins cites the complexity, fluency, and ‘intelligence’ of Claude’s answers as evidence of consciousness. Follow: @AFpost
Community note
Misrepresentation: Dawkins explicitly says he doesn't know if Claude is conscious. His actual argument is evolutionary: if unconscious AI matches every competence of a conscious being, what did evolution select consciousness for? unherd.com/2026/05/is-ai-
1
1
902
Left wing women yearn for the robber barons.
Check out my latest blog post titled "Pygmalion's Mirror," where I try to end "gender-slop Samsara" with a set of simple questions (for women).
319
The laity should STOP policing the laity at church. ✅Want to bow at the celebrant in procession? Whatever. ✅Want to sit or kneel during Epistle? Whatever. ✅Want to use orans hands during prayer? Whatever. ✅Want to pray the Rosary after Communion? Whatever. ✅Want to shake hands or not shake hands? Whatever. It's like being on a dance floor and thinking “Wow! That other couple over there doesn't know how to waltz properly. I should go over there and tell them they are doing it all wrong!” Laymen should be laymen. We are NOT governed by sacerdotal rubrics.
Bowing to the Priest at Mass? Not every reverent gesture is actually traditional By Patrick Madrid patrickmadrid.substack.com/p…
160
65
1,077
150,303
There is something deeply immodest and repulsive about all the people who jump in a thread about someone receiving Confirmation just to harp on about various podcast dramas she has going on. Even if there is merit to the criticism, this is clearly not the time and place. You don’t have to like her, but at least show some respect for the sacrament.
“The sacrament of Baptism makes us sons and daughters of the Father in Christ Jesus. Confimation makes us witnesses and transmitters of this new life within us to witness to Christ and bring truth to our neighbour. This will involve a personal and public struggle between the mystery of salvation and the mystery of iniquity—a spiritual combat against the forces of evil. Like soldiers, we enter into the combat of Christ and with Christ, assisted by the grace of the sacrament of Confirmation…” ✝️
4
3
483
The same goes for all the people sharing their fringe theology takes. Take it to your own timelines, it’s not relevant to a thread about a Catholic sacrament.
1
321
I’ve always said the mass responses, but this aggressive pushing of the practice by self-appointed internet popes is making me reconsider.
What's it mean when over half the people in Mass don't participate or say the responses?
1
1
3
424
Especially after apparently having been excommunicated simply for not wanting to condemn the rosary prayers: x.com/gjmc358421/status/2041…
1
294
Well said. The salvation of souls are at stake, there can be exactly zero patience and tolerance for those who treat the Church as some kind of playhouse.
The more I think about this the angrier I get Who the hell do you think you are? “Go to the margins” was a lie “Todos todos todos” was a lie “Heaven rejoices at one conversion” was a lie You don’t love your brothers. You don’t love the Church. You love only your ideology and those who conform to it. You need to understand one thing and quickly: Christ’s church will outlast you It will grow against your will and pass you by. We remember Arius and Nestorius. But we will forget you. Your beige Catholicism will die off be forgotten. Not worthy of being named. Not even worth a footnote in an obscure history book. That is your fate.
227
This is probably besides St. Louis de Montfort’s point, but Zionists love to imagine that Jacob’s blessing in fact applies to them. But doesn’t this description of Esau sound an exactly like 1948-Israel? 1—Case in point: the leveling of Gaza. 2—Tell the likes of @benshapiro or @marklevinshow that they may be happier in Israel and watch them fly off the handle. 3—No concern for their mother America, only extracting resources, military secrets and dragging her into pointless wars against her interests. 4—Ever insatiable to swallow more land, from the Euphrates to the Nile 5—Spitting on Christians, blocking the Patriarch from entering the Holy Sepulcher, bombing St. Porphyrius and Holy Family in Gaza
1
2
1,784
I wonder how many of the Protestants scrambling to get us to side with the Zionists and condemn @CarriePrejean1 now regret burning all the goodwill they had by posting all those off-topic anti-Catholic comments in our internal threads.
355
Tech Trad retweeted
I think what finally hit me about this is that it’s a smug and one-sided expression of power. You have to respect her because she’s the captain. But she doesn’t have to show you even the most basic courtesy of acting like she’s in the presence of another person. This is “ha ha I can break the rules but you can’t” behavior. The sort of thing you do in front of a powerless servant. Very ugly. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised since it was probably written by people willing to treat people who don’t agree with them as subhuman.
What a joke. She is literally lounging across the captain’s chair like it’s a therapist’s couch. Trek is no longer about aspiration. It’s about relatability and comfort? Which is kind of the ultimate irony for a show that used to be about leaving comfort behind to face the unknown.
142
197
3,904
124,698
This is a very fair commentary on the recent @tyleraloevera video from an inside point of view:
Replying to @FriedaVizel
I watched @tyleraloevera's whole video for you and reacted to it here: youtu.be/ZlWRN4jo-CA?si=Ba3Z…
1
446
Tech Trad retweeted
Replying to @Con_Tomlinson
I found out when Amelia first got radicalized
1
4
40
1,768
Tech Trad retweeted
Going into a coffee shop and the barista doesn't know what a cappuccino is Going through TSA and people don't know whether to take their shoes off and the TSA doesn't know how to communicate that to them besides yelling the rule at each individual person Going through grocery store checkout and the cashier doesn't speak English well enough to understand you need a bag and then isn't experienced enough with bagging to know you can't put 30 lbs of groceries in one single bag Going through automatic checkout and the people in line don't understand you can go to an open kiosk when the light is green so they just stand at the front waiting for instruction Getting on the train and nobody else understands that you need to let the deboarding passengers off first creating a chaotic rush as the doors start closing on people The real world is entering its Eternal September
WHAT IS ‘ETERNAL SEPTEMBER’? Useful term to conceptualise repetitive, asinine or low-level ‘discourse’ online, especially in formerly ‘more intelligent’ spaces experiencing a mass influx of new participants - “Eternal September”. The term originates in the early history of the internet and describes a fundamental shift in how online communities behave once they are exposed to continuous mass participation. It first emerged in the early 1990s in reference to Usenet, one of the first large-scale online discussion systems. For many years, Usenet experienced a predictable annual cycle tied to the academic calendar. Each September, new university students gained access to the internet and began posting, often unfamiliar with established norms of online conduct, known as then as ‘netiquette’. Older users would spend several weeks correcting mistakes, sharing community ‘lore’, pointing newcomers to FAQs and enforcing community standards. By October, most new users had either adapted or left and the community returned to a relatively stable equilibrium This pattern ended in 1993 when commercial internet providers, most notably America Online, opened Usenet access to millions of subscribers. Unlike universities, these services added users continuously rather than seasonally and provided little guidance on existing norms. The influx of newcomers became constant and overwhelming, far exceeding the community’s ability to socialise them. As a result, the corrective phase never ended. September became permanent, giving rise to the phrase “Eternal September.” While the term originally referred to this specific moment in Usenet’s history, it has since become a broader metaphor for what happens when an established online culture is inundated by perpetual growth. Maybe you can think of parallels here! At its core Eternal September describes the breakdown of shared norms under conditions of unbounded scale. Early online communities were small enough to rely on informal social enforcement. Participants recognised one another, reputations mattered, bad behavior carried social costs etc. Norms such as staying on topic, avoiding repetition and not wasting people’s time with your dumb stupid retarded priors posts were essential to keeping discussions usable. Because growth was slow and predictable, these communities could absorb newcomers without losing coherence. Eternal September marks the point at which this balance collapses - as the number and rate of new participants make informal governance (broadly-defined) ineffective The consequences are the loss of this kind of ‘historical memory’ are both cultural and structural. As newcomers vastly outnumber long-term participants, veteran or ‘oldhead’ influence diminishes and the incentive to teach these norms erodes. (4chan used to have the motto “lurk more” for this purpose). Experienced users grow fatigued from repeating the same talking points, always making corrections etc and often disengage, taking the community’s memory and knowledge with them. Norms that once defined the place are diluted or replaced, the ‘Coca Cola Effect’ runs riot - often shifting toward simplicity and immediacy rather than depth or rigour. On social media platforms lowest common denominator influencers grow more than more reflective, intelligent influencers etc. The culture adapts to what requires the least shared context, often at the cost of quality or nuance [1/2]
122
851
11,867
975,080
The problem zoomers struggle with is very similar to the hypothetical Alisdair Macintyre proposes at the beginning of After Virtue. They understand that there was a thing called masculinity that they are seeking to reconstruct, but they only have the exigencies and aesthetics from which to judge, they understand nothing of the essence which produces the outcomes. Their reconstruction therefore looks artificial, immaterial, and bizarre from the authentic position. They were raised in a feminist system and lack the cultural tools to actually become men in any traditional sense, and so are left attempting to pick up the pieces. It's not their fault, but it is their burden.
Clavicular talks to Nick Fuentes about going on steroids, getting double jaw surgery, leg extensions & Looks-Maxxing to ascend as much as possible as a White man. "It's all about going further beyond. It's in our DNA to push the limits & obtain Gigachad."
489
355
5,031
430,951