1OF1 collaborates with forward thinking artists and institutions by collecting, contextualizing and supporting art of the digital age.

Metaverse
Pinned Tweet
We are excited to celebrate the recent acquisitions of Chromie Squiggles and CryptoPunks into @MuseumModernArt's permanent collection. We are all profoundly grateful to the artists and collectors who supported this important donation, uniting the collective generosity of this amazing community. MoMA has been championing transformative art of the modern era for nearly a century and remains at the vanguard as we peer into the digital frontier. Thank you to @ArtOnBlockchain, @CozomoMedici, @gmoneyNFT, @jdh, @judithESSS, @kukulabanze, @larvalabs, @NTmoney, @Rhyd0n, @squiggleDAO, and @VonMises14 for your profound generosity, as well as to MoMA’s Stuart Comer & Michelle Kuo for their extraordinary support and curatorial vision.
188
64
415
53,000
They said photography wasn’t art. They said cinema wasn’t art. They said video games weren’t art. Now they say AI arts/digital art isn’t art. I’ve spent over a decade with my studio team turning millions of data points into living, breathing artwork experiences ethically — at MoMA, at the Guggenheim, at the Venice Biennale. Not because a machine told me what to create, but because I had a vision that no traditional tool could realize. Denying all AI technologies as an artistic medium doesn’t protect art. It limits it. The artists who embrace new tools don’t replace the old masters — they join them. Art is not defined by the brush. It’s defined by the intention, the emotion, and the courage to see the world differently.
501
522
2,656
583,671
new yorkers: see you tonight! 💙
3
4
40
653
AI Art is also Digital Art. Period. If your critique starts and ends with "AI bad and theft etc," you're not protecting art — you're avoiding a conversation. Have you looked basically into how we collect our data? Ethically sourced recognized by United Nations. Have you asked what powers our AI research work? Sustainable compute recognized by UNEP. Have you heard of the Large Nature Model — an AI trained on the living data of nature itself, not scraped from the internet and collected by us last 3 three years to be open sourced? You don't have to use AI. I respect that and I got it. But dismissing something you haven't researched isn't criticism — it's fear wearing the mask of principle. Curiosity built every art movement in history. Why do you let yours end here?
They said photography wasn’t art. They said cinema wasn’t art. They said video games weren’t art. Now they say AI arts/digital art isn’t art. I’ve spent over a decade with my studio team turning millions of data points into living, breathing artwork experiences ethically — at MoMA, at the Guggenheim, at the Venice Biennale. Not because a machine told me what to create, but because I had a vision that no traditional tool could realize. Denying all AI technologies as an artistic medium doesn’t protect art. It limits it. The artists who embrace new tools don’t replace the old masters — they join them. Art is not defined by the brush. It’s defined by the intention, the emotion, and the courage to see the world differently.
80
44
252
19,453
Bots, many bots :) They could use AI to conduct deep research on our work, understand our custom AI models for each museum exhibition, but even that intelligence is sadly missing.
2
2
26
826
• I closely followed the reactions to @refikanadol 's works at the exhibitions we visited twice, and I also brought along two friends who aren't particularly interested in art to add to my mini experiment. Some things I observed: 1. Some people say they see a dreamlike effect in Anadol's works, and these people are pointing to something unique. 2. This art makes even people who are not interested in art part of the story; people want to look back one more time even as they walk out the door. 3. Anadol's interdisciplinary fusion style is noticeable, and people want to see themselves in this seamless flow.
Glenn Lowry: "[Anadol] wrote some algorithms that allowed the data from one object to evolve into the data of another object to become yet a third object or a fourth object never before seen... people found it deeply satisfying." Former Director of MoMA, for 60 Minutes.
8
5
38
3,458
Refik Anadol: "There is also a professional tension embedded in this – I genuinely believe I am only ever as good as my next project. It is a demanding inner algorithm that ensures each new endeavor is more challenging than the last." From Beyond the Algorithm: Refik Anadol on AI, Art, and the Future of Museums for HYPE&HYPER Magazine, August 13, 2025.
They said photography wasn’t art. They said cinema wasn’t art. They said video games weren’t art. Now they say AI arts/digital art isn’t art. I’ve spent over a decade with my studio team turning millions of data points into living, breathing artwork experiences ethically — at MoMA, at the Guggenheim, at the Venice Biennale. Not because a machine told me what to create, but because I had a vision that no traditional tool could realize. Denying all AI technologies as an artistic medium doesn’t protect art. It limits it. The artists who embrace new tools don’t replace the old masters — they join them. Art is not defined by the brush. It’s defined by the intention, the emotion, and the courage to see the world differently.
6
46
4,043
guess what i’m bringing with me to nyc… 📚📗
3
7
73
1,236
Glenn Lowry: "[Anadol] wrote some algorithms that allowed the data from one object to evolve into the data of another object to become yet a third object or a fourth object never before seen... people found it deeply satisfying." Former Director of MoMA, for 60 Minutes.
When you think about the way art is created, you might imagine painters, photographers, or sculptors immersed in their work at their studios. But what about a person sitting in front of a computer screen using artificial intelligence and data to create visuals. Is that art? cbsn.ws/46OFUB2
1
2
41
4,984
1OF1 retweeted
Exactly my experience. That s a big reason why I hang Refik’s art in my living room. I always call his large works “perception altering experiences”. Fun to see science agree, almost literally.
Replying to @1OF1_art
UNSUPERVISED evoked elevated states of pleasure and excitement in its viewers, actively restructuring the viewer's emotional state and proving the profound psychological weight of AI Art. View the Study: sciencedirect.com/science/ar… Source: Blanco, Á. D., Kroupi, E., Soria-Frisch, A., Gazzaley, A., Anadol, R., Maiques, A., & Ruffini, G. (2025). Enhancing mental well-being through AI-generated art: Insights from EEG responses to Refik Anadol's Unsupervised at MoMA. The Arts in Psychotherapy.
1
5
587
I was honored to be one of the 31 people invited by MoMA and RAS to be part of this study. It was epic to spend 20 minutes sitting alone and in silence in front of Unsupervised. The results definitely match my experience, an increased sense of pleasure through the observation.
Replying to @1OF1_art
UNSUPERVISED evoked elevated states of pleasure and excitement in its viewers, actively restructuring the viewer's emotional state and proving the profound psychological weight of AI Art. View the Study: sciencedirect.com/science/ar… Source: Blanco, Á. D., Kroupi, E., Soria-Frisch, A., Gazzaley, A., Anadol, R., Maiques, A., & Ruffini, G. (2025). Enhancing mental well-being through AI-generated art: Insights from EEG responses to Refik Anadol's Unsupervised at MoMA. The Arts in Psychotherapy.
7
5
96
8,950
In 2024, in an attempt to understand the cognitive and emotional resonance of @refikanadol's UNSUPERVISED, scientists equipped visitors to MoMA with EEG headsets, capturing the precise neurobiological signature of an aesthetic encounter. Aesthetic encounters refer to intense, self-reported states of deep attention, focus, and a temporary loss of self-awareness experienced by visitors while engaging with the artwork. These are moments where individuals become fully immersed in the artistic experience.
How did visitors react to a work of AI art at New York’s Museum of Modern Art? “It was an utterly extraordinary hit,” says Glenn Lowry, who was MoMA's director at the time of the exhibit. cbsn.ws/4qU9PPF
1
4
58
6,456
They found that the aesthetic power of UNSUPERVISED translated directly into a measurable neurobiological signature, with elevated anterior gamma power mirroring the viewer’s profound sense of awe and immersion. The recorded frequencies showed that true aesthetic engagement provoked high-frequency gamma activity in the anterior brain, signifying an intense state of unified perception. Paired with changes in Frontal Alpha Asymmetry, they were able to isolate the exact biological marker where visual complexity converts into profound pleasure.
2
13
340
UNSUPERVISED evoked elevated states of pleasure and excitement in its viewers, actively restructuring the viewer's emotional state and proving the profound psychological weight of AI Art. View the Study: sciencedirect.com/science/ar… Source: Blanco, Á. D., Kroupi, E., Soria-Frisch, A., Gazzaley, A., Anadol, R., Maiques, A., & Ruffini, G. (2025). Enhancing mental well-being through AI-generated art: Insights from EEG responses to Refik Anadol's Unsupervised at MoMA. The Arts in Psychotherapy.
1
3
23
8,172
Yes, this is poetry. 💚 @MuseumModernArt
3
6
54
1,015
Glenn Lowry: "One has to recognize that works of art that challenge you are always going to be misunderstood by many at first." Former Director of MoMA speaking on @refikanadol’s UNSUPERVISED (Nov 19, 2022–Oct 29, 2023) for 60 Minutes.
Pulitzer Prize-winning art critic Jerry Saltz says most AI art still falls short, calling 90% of it “crap.” But then again, “90% of the art made during the Renaissance was also crap," Saltz says. "Things take time.” cbsn.ws/46kxbGy
2
4
56
4,403
Clip from 60 Minutes showcasing our exhibition with @refikanadol at Guggenheim Bilbao, Living Architecture: Ghery, inaugurating the museum's in situ series. In the 188 days on view, it attracted nearly 900k visitors, becoming the most visited exhibition in the museum's history.
Every image in this studio was created by artist Refik Anadol using artificial intelligence. cbsn.ws/3ZQqcBI
2
1
16
1,024
in situ: Refik Anadol exemplified @refikanadol's vision for site-specific, AI-driven installations — wherein data becomes material and space becomes a living canvas shaped by memory, form, and imagination. Through the lens of advanced artificial intelligence, the works of legendary architect Frank Gehry are not just displayed but dynamically reimagined, offering a new way to experience and interact with the architects iconic forms.
1
3
147
The installation continued @refikanadolras's pioneering explorations into digital exhibition formats, deploying 48 projectors to illuminated a 16-meter (53-foot) wall at an extraordinary resolution of 20,072 × 4,416 pixels. Representing one of the studio's most ambitious installations to date, the exhibition presented a profound evolution in digital exhibition capabilities.
1
102
1OF1 retweeted
Refik Anadol Studio: "The average amount of time that a visitor spends gazing at 'Unsupervised' is 38 minutes. For comparison, the average viewing time of a typical famous work of art, such as 'Starry Night,' is 27.2 seconds."
While some are skeptical of AI art, former MoMA Director Glenn Lowry says it might be misunderstood. He compares it to the invention of photography 200 years ago. cbsn.ws/4tR1eQ6
46
39
423
72,745
Digital art & Refik on 60 Minutes… love to see it 👏
Every image in this studio was created by artist Refik Anadol using artificial intelligence. cbsn.ws/3ZQqcBI
29
32
398
23,129