MANDATORY READING 👇👇👇 Per @TheJusticeDept, one of the Biden-era FBI’s biggest blunders behind the "Richmond Field Memo" was relying on biased and unverified materials from the Southern Poverty Law Center — an organization now under federal criminal indictment. The @FBI cut ties with the SPLC. @TheJusticeDept indicted it, then expanded the case through superseding indictments. Media outlets and major corporations have quietly walked away. Yet somehow the SPLC’s ideological blacklisting gameplan keeps spreading — now even to Europe. Remember the ex-SPLC intelligence chief who the DOJ indicted for helping funnel SPLC donor money to an informant embedded in a white-supremacist group — who also happened to be her romantic partner? Well, she co-founded the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, which globalizes SPLC’s "name and shame" playbook — the one that put Catholic groups under surveillance and listed Charlie Kirk months before his assassination – and is now actively pressing the European Union and other foreign governments to use global digital censorship regimes like the Digital Services Act against speech it labels as “hate.” Enough. Disagreement is not discrimination. Debate is not hate. A free society depends on knowing the difference — and on refusing to let discredited partisan actors draw the line for us.

The WNBA's problem just keeps growing... Suzanne Beecher of @ADFLegal tells @JackThompsonFOX the organization's goal behind their letter to the WNBA to protect women's sports defenders from being silenced.

Having spent the last 10 years at @ADFLegal advocating to keep men out of women's sports and spaces, I want to ensure those hard-won victories are not undermined by the Protect College Sports Act--especially when the solution is so simple. In a nearly 200-page bill, we can find room for clarity to preserve fairness in women's sports. thehill.com/opinion/congress…

Grateful for this decision, and for all who spoke out with courage and clarity. Let’s work together to fix the bill.

Thank you for your leadership! @AGToddRokita, @AGJamesUthmeier, @AGSteveMarshall, @AGDerekBrown, @Okla_OAG, and Acting Attorney General Cori Mills of Alaska.

For those asking “how would you edit the Protect College Sports Act to remove the risk to women’s sports?” . . . this is it. ⬇️ This is all @ADFLegal is asking Senators to add. A few words—most of which are single letters and numbers. Just a small change that would have a big impact for women and girls. This edit would tighten the language against efforts by activist judges to misinterpret the bill’s intent: addressing issues in college sports without preempting state laws that keep men out of women’s sports. Our team has been quietly asking the sponsors for this edit for weeks. But when our fix was ignored and the bill scheduled for a Senate vote, we felt a duty to speak up. Because our first loyalty is to the female athletes we’ve been representing in courtrooms and legislatures for nearly a decade. Athletes like @Riley_Gaines_, who knows all too well how little the NCAA cares about women’s privacy, fairness, and opportunity. Athletes like Madi Kenyon, who was forced to race against a male in women’s collegiate track. Athletes like Adaleia Cross, who stopped playing women’s high school sports after being bumped from competition and sexually harassed by a male on her team. The Protect College Sports Act is a massive bill delving into the minutiae of college sports—from NIL agreements to coach transfers to the suggested date for the college football championship. Surely we can spare a few words to safeguard the progress we’ve made for Riley, Madi, Adaleia, and all the young women coming after them.

The “Protect College Sports Act" has a fatal flaw: It doesn’t protect women | Riley Gaines foxnews.com/outkick-sports/p… #FoxNews

The Protect College Sports Act protects the NCAA. The NCAA does NOT protect female athletes. Unless it's amended, I do not support the Protect College Sports Act. There is no room for ambiguity.

We can’t go backwards on women’s sports!

🚨 For weeks, ADF has warned Congress that activists could misuse the preemption language in the Protect College Sports Act to undermine states’ women’s sports laws. We're urging the Senate to swiftly clarify before this bill reaches a vote. Full press release: adflegal.org/press-release/a…

🚨 URGENT: The current version of the Protect College Sports Act could jeopardize women’s sports. Every Senator who cares about women’s equal opportunity should act immediately to clarify that this bill does not preempt state laws protecting girls’ sports. There is a simple fix available: ensure the preemption of state laws is narrow. We are living in a moment where lawyers can’t even define what a woman is. There’s no room for ambiguity. Let’s not undo the hard-fought gains or pass permanent legislation that could jeopardize these victories. We are thankful for President Trump’s legacy of protecting women’s sports to date. We don’t want to see it undone. It’s time to keep girls on the field, not sideline them again.

No one should lose access to financial services because a big bank doesn't like their religious or political views. South Carolina recently passed legislation protecting against debanking. @MattSharpADF explains:

"Missouri taxpayers can now be confident that their hard-earned dollars will not be used to fund gender transition procedures for inmates." @DougRichey

Tomorrow, the Supreme Court decides State of West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox. Biological truth doesn’t just matter for sports. It’s matters in locker rooms, shelters, prisons, and school trips. It’s about whether the word “woman” still means something under the law. Tomorrow we may get an answer. #ProtectWomensSports @ADFLegal

The Supreme Court has an opportunity tomorrow to reaffirm state's rights to protect women's sports, women's spaces, and women's safety. We are hopeful and praying they'll get it right! #ProtectWomensSports @ADFLegal @alliancedefendingfreedom

Years of litigation on behalf of courageous young women have led to this moment. Now, the U.S. Supreme Court has the chance to protect them. Decision day in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J. is coming soon. Our legal experts will be on a livestream to break down the decision!