Founder @ArtificeSystems (formerly @JestTech) Founder @scherwode TG: @AJRuecker DMs open.

Canada
The amount of work done, and now shown... XX days until that changes.
Getting early access to checkout and test @ArtificeSystems new stuff and the new terminal Sayis. @AJRuecker In the kitchen. honestly here this S*** will change the game, up and to the left.
2
11
295
1
6
207
Me in 2023: I like my strategy, I'll just share it with others. Me in 2026: oh
1
4
153

ALT So It Begins Christmas Season GIF

7
225
Still adjusting as needed, but getting there.
2
11
301
Tfw you're just sitting there, and a new name for your product appears in your head.
3
228
Realizing I am too quiet on here. I never stop working on stuff (I have no life rn). Daily posting incoming.
1
14
307
Scientio 🃏 retweeted
Scherwode Graft A community should be able to move chains or relaunch without pretending the old contract is somehow the new one. Graft is basically how we are handling that on Scherwode. You escrow the legacy token, get marks, and those marks claim a finite portion of the new token on the destination chain. Not a tradable IOU, just a clean way to prove who migrated and what they are entitled to. The other part is liquidity. If there is recoverable capital from the old token, that gets moved over and matched into real liquidity on the new chain, so you are not just launching from zero again and hoping everyone buys the curve. Claims can unlock on a published schedule, anything unclaimed can burn, anything that never migrates can stay locked, and the actual relaunch terms are set before anyone deposits. Supply, dilution, direct launch vs curve, Wild vs Rooted, whatever makes sense for that project, but it is all disclosed up front. Not live yet, but we are building the rails for it now.
3
6
16
289
gm world
1
2
169
Scientio 🃏 retweeted
made my day reading the best advertisement for @DefinitiveFi on the feed. to implement limit orders (and all of advanced trading for that matter), you need: • god-tier pricing engine to price every asset • in-house trade execution, not third party • high frequency quant modules for perfection it takes serious experience in financial engineering to build it correctly. so much that we offer our trade execution as our Flash API today as many have approached us after their own attempts at it. so how was Definitive able to deliver full advanced trading for onchain tokens ahead of everyone else by a few years? the truth is the team at Definitive have built the above system already THREE times before, including at @coinbase, and finally at Definitive. since then, we've done a billions of volume through our battle-tested trading engine. every trade contributes to its ongoing improvement. today, we execute seamlessly on limit, DCA, stop orders for any asset on 12+ chains with more chains coming.
If you are shitting on @fomo for not having limit orders because you think you can just "vibe code" it then you do not know what it takes to build a good trading product GOOD limit orders are hard. I’ve personally used a terminal with poorly implemented limit orders and lost $10k+ because of it. Getting this wrong is worse than not having it at all because the moment users can’t trust your execution, you lose them. A limit order is not just: “if price hits X → buy/sell” That’s the easy part. First, you need RELIABLE market data/indexing so you detect the trigger accurately and quickly. Then you need the execution layer to actually work: routing, transaction construction, priority fees, retries, fallbacks, MEV protection, slippage controls, liquidity checks, etc. Getting the trigger right means nothing if the trade itself executes like shit. And meme coins make this even harder. A token can move 10–20%+ while you go from: price hits trigger → detect it → build tx → route it → land onchain Your “limit price” and your actual fill can be very different things. Now multiply all of this across chains. Different execution environments, liquidity venues, routers/aggregators, RPC infrastructure, block times, MEV dynamics, transaction mechanics, and failure modes. If you know Fomo- their goal isn’t to build the best terminal for one chain. It’s to make the same trading experience work across ALL of them - the user shouldn’t need to care what chain, venue, or infrastructure is underneath. The product should just work. That means every new chain isn’t simply “add a button.” You have to make sure the data, triggering, execution, and failure handling are reliable enough that the experience feels consistent everywhere. I know many of you think you are exposing Fomo But you are actually exposing how little you understand about trading infrastructure
9
11
63
14,416
I don't shill many things. But these are some homies. Good guys.
If you like $fuse, check us out. Cope Index launched on Fuse. Will be the first major runner as we catch eyes. Join us! dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x5…
6
286
$WODE sellers can't use block explorer, and it shows

ALT Leonardo Dicaprio Smile GIF

1
9
298
People really need to learn how to read the blockchain. I've been drip feeding alpha for a week.
More than 50% of the basket supply is already burnt, and launch activity keeps feeding value back into what remains. Less supply. Stronger basket. scherwode.fun
2
1
11
362
The glaring hole in this idea is compute. If you don't have a correct harness for the agents to run in, you're just going to burn through tokens at a rate that's going to eat into your potential profit. That's what @ArtificeSystems is solving. Instead of having your agents burning through tokens, hallucinating, and incorrectly storing research and data. You can just use artifice which works as a harness for the agent. It'll reduce your token costs, as all at that point is your agent simply calling tools.
GPT-6 Astra just killed the biggest advantage hedge funds had research teams. i built a one-person quant research desk that scans markets 24/7, tests trading ideas, and filters out weak setups before they touch capital. the full paper breaks down the system: 1. 4 places where markets repeatedly misprice risk relative-value spreads, factor dislocations, volatility anomalies, and event-driven moves 2. the Astra research loop it turns a market anomaly into a testable hypothesis, writes the first backtest, then tries to break its own result 3. the rejection engine most strategies look good before you add fees, slippage, execution delay, and regime shifts Astra kills them before they become expensive 4. the signal score every setup is ranked by expected edge after costs, stability across regimes, and hidden factor exposure 5. the human risk gate the AI does not get permission to trade it sends the setup, the logic, the downside, and the invalidation level you make the final call while most traders ask AI: “what should i buy?” the real edge is making it reject 99 bad trades before you see them. this is how a one-person hedge fund gets built with GPT-6 Astra:
2
3
8
261
Instagram and Tiktok are absolutely the fucking worst pos platforms I have ever used for onboarding business accounts.
5
166

ALT Paramount Network Burn GIF by Yellowstone

LIVE NOW — Sprouted tokens. A token launches, people trade it, and part of that activity starts building a real perpetual position underneath it. That’s the basic idea. Scherwode handles the launch and token side. @artificeSystems powers the perpetual side, with positions settled on Hyperliquid. So instead of all the activity just disappearing into fees and liquidity, the launch starts growing something underneath itself. scherwode.fun/create
6
201
Scientio 🃏 retweeted
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump rejects calls to slow down AI development.
1,222
1,972
25,702
3,633,441
wait chat, he is actually right.
Common sense will not accomplish great things. simply become insane and desperate.
1
2
168
I think one of the things I’ve changed my mind on is Christianity, because as much as I still hate a lot of it, I increasingly think we probably had to go through it. Hellenism had philosophy, beauty, knowledge, all of that. The failure was that the people who had built and inherited that world stopped acting like they intended to keep it. Conquest slowed, control weakened, the elite became comfortable, cynical and apathetic, and into that vacuum came people who were absolutely not apathetic. Zealots almost always beat people who no longer believe enough in their own civilization to defend it. Christianity basically put a giant restraint system over Europe for 1,500 years. Guilt, duty, monogamy, obedience, universal moral rules, the idea that even the king answers to something above him. A lot of it was chains, but chains are useful when most people cannot actually carry freedom without turning it into chaos. And now I think we are starting to come out the other side of that, not by “going back to paganism” in some cringe cosplay sense, but into something signifantly more potent. Something Hermetic/Odinic, where knowledge itself is power again, where symbols actually alter reality, where runes are code and models and systems and the people capable of using them are slowly having the old restraints taken off.
"Why are runes always ancient, why'd we stop making new runes?" "Brother. we made runes so complex that sand started thinking"
7
2,180
Common sense will not accomplish great things. simply become insane and desperate.
4
415