People are rushing to the comments to invoke the 12,000 Arabs from the Palestinian Mandate who fought for the British and the faction of anti-Zionist radicals like Hajj Amin al-Husseini alike who supported and aided the Third Reich. This simply reveals the complex nature of the Mandate during this time.
What truly matters is the legacy that was left behind. Pro-Palestinian movements are not the intellectual descendants of those 12,000 soldiers who fought for the Crown against the Axis, who are largely forgotten. All one has to do is look at the rhetoric crafted by Hajj Amin and the Arab section of the Third Reich's Foreign and Propaganda Offices. It laid the template for just about everything we hear today from these movements, particularly with the consistent blurring of "Zionists" and "Jews." This was all essentially lifted by the Soviets some decades later when they decided to be Third Worldists' golden goose, but that's a different story.
The point is, if you study intellectual history, you come to understand that you can't pick and choose which ideas carry more weight today based on what you want to believe about your own cause. Intellectual heritage is mappable, and there is zero doubt for anyone that actually studies history that the Third Reich's Islamophilia, opportunistic propaganda strategies, and allyship with the most genocidal faction of the Palestinian nationalist movement (who continued selling land to Jews and selling out their supposed fellow countrymen, but again, that's a different story) is the historical nexus point for what became Palestinianism.
I’ve just seen the so-called "Palestine Poppy" & it’s one of the most worst things I’ve ever seen.
Attempting to hijack on a well known apolitical symbol which brings people together on Remembrance Day is completely disrespectful.
Only the most insufferable people will wear it.