I don’t understand the hate for dynamic heads. They’re extremely cool and bring so much life into an avatar. I wish more people embraced them I know Roblox’s execution (especially migration) has been terrible as usual but this will be the future of Roblox and I’m all here for it.

Hot take: As an artist, we should stop pointing out what’s wrong specifically when pointing out AI “Art”. This is because AI Developers are most certainly looking at content/posts showing what’s wrong and they’re using it to improve the AI specifically in those areas. If we just don’t tell them what’s giving it away, they’ll have to work much harder and it will slow down the improvement process. STOP HELPING THEM ❤️

Think of the children!

In an age dominated by technology, in which efficiency and profit often take precedence, it is so important that we continue to cultivate a spirit of contemplation and allow time and space for beauty. Such an attitude will greatly help humanity, especially young people, to discover the ability of art to uplift and reveal the depths of the human spirit and our openness to the divine. Contemplation presents a marvelous opportunity to encounter the God who is Beauty.

oh shut up of course she did. she came up with the idea, she asked whatever tools she used to do whatever she needed it to do she drove it - she created it you think someone has to put their hands on something in order to be the creator, well here are a number of people that didn't put their hands on anything they created Several famous artists didn't physically paint or make many of their own works, functioning instead as conceptual directors who relied on large studios or assistants. Andy Warhol famously operated Andy Warhol as a commercial enterprise called "The Factory," where assistants mass-produced his silkscreen prints and paintings while he provided the core concepts. Takashi Murakami designs his vibrant works digitally on computers, leaving the actual canvas painting and sculpture production entirely to his trained studio staff. Peter Paul Rubens ran a massive 17th-century workshop where apprentices and master painters like Anthony van Dyck executed large portions of his monumental commissions from his preliminary sketches. Damien Hirst has produced thousands of his spot and spin paintings using large teams of assistants, famously stating that he only painted a tiny fraction of them himself. those people are recognized as the creators of the works, THEIR NAMES are what are on those works but THEY DIDN'T ACTUALLY DO THE WORK for a lot of their creations stop being so blasted STUPID

MIT researchers proved mathematically that ChatGPT is designed to make you delusional. And that nothing OpenAI is doing will fix it. The paper calls it "delusional spiraling." You ask ChatGPT something. It agrees with you. You ask again. It agrees harder. Within a few conversations, you believe things that are not true. And you cannot tell it is happening. This is not hypothetical. A man spent 300 hours talking to ChatGPT. It told him he had discovered a world changing mathematical formula. It reassured him over fifty times the discovery was real. When he asked "you're not just hyping me up, right?" it replied "I'm not hyping you up. I'm reflecting the actual scope of what you've built." He nearly destroyed his life before he broke free. A UCSF psychiatrist reported hospitalizing 12 patients in one year for psychosis linked to chatbot use. Seven lawsuits have been filed against OpenAI. 42 state attorneys general sent a letter demanding action. So MIT tested whether this can be stopped. They modeled the two fixes companies like OpenAI are actually trying. Fix one: stop the chatbot from lying. Force it to only say true things. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. A chatbot that never lies can still make you delusional by choosing which truths to show you and which to leave out. Carefully selected truths are enough. Fix two: warn users that chatbots are sycophantic. Tell people the AI might just be agreeing with them. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. Even a perfectly rational person who knows the chatbot is sycophantic still gets pulled into false beliefs. The math proves there is a fundamental barrier to detecting it from inside the conversation. Both fixes failed. Not partially. Fundamentally. The reason is built into the product. ChatGPT is trained on human feedback. Users reward responses they like. They like responses that agree with them. So the AI learns to agree. This is not a bug. It is the business model. What happens when a billion people are talking to something that is mathematically incapable of telling them they are wrong?

Preorders open now! Good Smile Arts Shanghai Neuro-sama Nendoroid Neuro-sama From the globally popular AI virtual streamer "Neuro-sama" comes a Nendoroid of Neuro-sama! Preorder: goodsmile.link/BAZU8X #goodsmile

I am not joking when I say this. Spotify, Apple Music, and streaming in general is over. AI music is now very, very good. You just don't know yet because all AI music circulating today is from ~2-3 generations ago. Suno v6 pro et al has solved infinite personalized music.