The gender identity movement — I call its supporters the genderati — is sexist and homophobic. But it has managed to confuse a large section of the public by the words it uses. It advocates being “inclusive”. Like this: “Inclusive” is good! 😄 Non-“inclusive” is bad 😡 Being “inclusive” means accepting that some men — oh sorry, I mean “trans women” — are lesbians. If you don’t accept that, you are “transphobic” and bad 😡😡 Another one is “hate”. Love is good 😍 Love everyone! “Hate” is bad 😡 Love means accepting that everyone is who/what he says he is. “Hate” is calling a man a man when he has expressly told you he is a woman.😡 That is “misgendering” - which is hateful and bad 😡😡 If you are an “ally” you understand that everyone knows who they are and what gender they are and you know they should access the spaces they want according to their “gender identity”. 😄 That is “kind” and “good” 😄😄 If you say they can’t access those spaces because of the law or because of some other stupid reason you are “transphobic”. Transphobic is bad 😡😡 According to the genderati, Europe is filling up alarmingly with people who say there are only two sexes and that sex is often important. That is not “inclusive”. It is bad. It is “transphobic”. It is ANTI GENDER. ANTI GENDER is hateful.😡 And really really really bad.😡😡😡

Evidence for conversion practices? Who needs evidence when you have exorcism and purifying substances? The intrepid therapist Peter Jenkins digs a bit deeper in the following article.👇

Poll below. 👇 I’m interested in the influence of Leslie Feinberg’s novel “Stone Butch Blues” and her other work in the US as opposed to other countries — especially on the prevalence of lesbians taking testosterone — whether or not they continue to call themselves lesbians. This is a question for lesbians — or female people who are attracted to other female people, whatever they call themselves. Please add comments.

Watch the conversion of a clinician who formerly believed in evidence-based science into a mouthpiece for the “transition” industry, retailing known falsehoods as if they had some factual basis. I wonder if Guyatt is so furious with Mia and Stella for exposing his arrogance and laziness in a viral interview that he sees this as some kind of petty payback. In fact he is simply making himself look even more ridiculous.

These harmful myths include: “Gender-affirming care is ‘lifesaving’ and its benefits are scientifically established.” “Puberty blockers are ‘reversible,’ safe, and supported by a ‘strong’ evidence base.” “Regret is below 1% and 98% of treated minors continue treatment into adulthood.”