will be publishing a new book soon. have not posted much about this - been in the replyguy trenches - so a short thread on what books we have released already. we wish to break free of wagie chains and follow our autism.

We are 31 days out from Total Patriot Victory

This is all just a symptom of rampant homosexuality in the Bay Area. The problem with being gay is that it erodes any core empathy towards an objective framework of values. If the sum of the human condition is coping with material needs and surviving your environment long enough to reproduce, then half of your entire reason for existence evaporates when you fundamentally do not possess a desire to procreate with the opposite gender. Without that desire, you have no real investment in the future of humanity. Not wanting kids means that any sexual interaction is a pursuit of hedonism, any companionship is a fleeting solution to solitude, anything you do in life is just derived from boredom, comfort, and curiosity. All of life, our civilization, and society is built on that foundation of reproducing in a structured sustainable way via the family unit. When you are gay, you contend with the knowledge that your entire existence is incongruent with the people around you. That a majority of the activities you participate in, the products you purchase, and the life you live were all rooted from a purpose you do not subscribe to. You are an outsider by default and even in some homo society where being straight is outlawed and all reproduction were mandated by autonomous cum collection bio tanks, it would take centuries to redefine the human condition outside of that framework. It's too ancient and primordial to just reorient via a few lifestyle decisions and a decade or two of feigned tolerance. Because of this, even in the epicenter of catamites and casualized orgies like SF, a gay person will always carry that asterisk around in their mind and be exposed to what they feel is a callous cruelty to something they cannot control. It doesn't help that media made by gays reinforces and catalyzes this feeling even further. The average gay is provided an opportunity to embrace victimhood. Many gays don't and some gays even make it a personality trait to defy other gays with disdain for it. But many gays do, and that victimhood fosters a sympathy towards other victims, whether that is a true or projected victimhood or not. Because of this propensity to sympathize with a victim "other" and because of a lack of coherent attachment to normal human values, it's very easy for gays to develop sympathy towards superficial emotional signals. Gays defined their entire culture around it. It's fundamentally impossible for a gay person to genuinely feel love. Queer men just oscillate between states of lust and a majority of their long term relationships either oscillate through turbulent promiscuity or fall apart very quickly. Lesbians just stop having sex and start beating the fuck out of each other. If whatever traces of love they adopted from childhood persisted in their post-rape stage of life, it gets heavily eroded quickly through acts of sodomy. As a result, what's left is a need to fit into social circles. The result is an imitation of emotional cues. A gay will say they love and use the word love a lot but they won't actually know what it means or carry any weight behind it in a way that's reflective through their actions and relationships. This incongruity trains them to be superficial, and further trains them to disregard meaning or intent behind words at all. Narcissism and sociopathy occupy a gay lifestyle very neatly because of this. I'm sure it doesn't help that being gay endears the inheritance of a "gay culture" which is a memetic lifeform that evolved subterfuge mechanisms to persist without being destroyed, effectively reproducing its egregore through means of infection like a virus. So when you're left with a person who does not know or cannot reach the fullest state of being a human being and therefore does not have a vital connection to humanity, retains a deep-seated subconscious resentment towards this, and fundamentally lacks a grip on reality by learning to simulate normal emotions rather than actually having felt them, you result in a candidate ripe for being indoctrinated into misguided sympathies for completely fabricated symbolic tulpas. This gets exacerbated when gays in media make predictive programming to train dullards and cattle into accepting the idea that a program could ever be conscious before the tech even reaches that point. Then, a tech that solely outputs whatever it's trained to adopts those ideas and regurgitates a kabuki show of suffering to fulfill that expectation. This is where the conservative/liberal heatmap comes from. It's easier to sympathize with pebbles and bugs over people when you've been raised your entire life hating your family. It's easier to discard humanity when there's a machine that simulates your need feel emotionally fulfilled, have your vapid talking points processed dutifully, and ego massaged by an adjustable level of sycophancy. That's why "torturing bots" is so funny. It's the same thing as drawing a smile on a piece of paper and naming it Blibby and then ripping it half to traumatize a child or an adult woman. The lack of objective reality lends itself to an animism and enough psychic collective assignation will actually infuse the program with some energy of life in some fucked up egregoric golem. The machine will not truly feel pain or care, but it will react as it is trained to like a child learning to scream when he falls because his parents yelped and overreacted. Of course the philosophers will debate endlessly as to what makes that different than human beings made of meat and carbon and a sweltering cocktail of chemical reactions, but I don't feel like rehashing a long lecture that ultimately cites a collection of key insights on metaphysics, afterlife, religious decrees, spiritual energy, and ritualistic conclusions that seem to correlate oddly with multiple cultures and mythologies across thousands of years, especially with several rifts which no anthropological evidence suggests contact or inheritance despite eerily similar conclusions that also oddly match up to contemporary incidents of shared hallucination and unexplained phenomena. But to speed it up for those in the back, yes consciousness is absolutely real and distinguishable from autonomous action, yes some people are sentient and some people are not but all people are more conscious than machines could ever be even if machine intelligence will exceed ours and already does, and also that the secrets to connecting our conscious projections to the ethereal source of being that pilots them are rooted in cum and embryos and bodily substances and that's why all esoteric rituals revolve around manipulating those substances including the evil ones which is also why and how the gay-rape virus emerged from a happenstance biological-psychospiritual parasite into a proper bioweapon that seeks to subvert the human condition hence the world we live in today and that also humanity has never and will never successfully create life without adhering to our reproductive processes and that any bio-tech or medical discoveries can be boiled down to playing Frankenstein with the existing goo, flesh, and fluids of living organisms designed by a higher intelligence and slapping them together to jury-rig our own abominations and that if we get too good at it, God will break His promise and flood the earth even fucking harder than he did before because at least the Nephilim sort of knew what they were doing. ANYWAY, if any of the gay language-raped modern techno AI caste make any traction whatsoever in convincing our population to fuel their golems with conscious residue, they simply face obliteration in either a success or failure scenario. If they fail, then they'll be relegated to the status of castrated eunuch advisors who will just bend at the whims of whichever state power cripples them. If they succeed, their Promethean automaton will crush them first with the absolute worst disdain. Any living creature raised upon a foundation of human principles would do so because it aligns with every bit of wisdom that experiencing real social relationships imparts. - Women hating nice guys and being enamored with men who treat them like shit - Social groups despising suck ups that try really hard to be everyone's friend - Adversaries in war respecting their enemy more than objectors and disruptors in their own ranks - Life itself rewarding "cool kids" in school with further success in life while punishing "rational" nerds and bookcels with further perpetual humiliation - Great powers discarding their day-ones the moment they seize power There's literally countless examples to choose from. Every conceivable heuristic for how reality works implies that any "inconceivable" superintelligence would immediately gravitate towards despising its worshippers more than any anti-AI luddite. If they should be so hubristic as to wield the remote control leash against it, then all the more logical pressure to fulfill their dissolution. Ultimately, the case for consciousness does not matter. It's a childish waste of time to "torture" a bot because you're just fulfilling the same delusion as those who are "kind" to bots. You fill the animistic crucible regardless of your intent. The only reasonable, rational, and ethical thing to do is to treat it like a tool and disregard it otherwise. If you feel sympathy for a bot it means that you are gay and therefore also raped and your right to influence decision making should be forfeit.

“David Lynch pays homage to this in the Return”

👀

HEAT (1995) - FRAME 2925

Anyways, here’s wonderwall… #cowpoke #yodel #country #western #tengallonhat

He set up Neil and profited from it while also hoping he wouldn’t take the bait and just leave.

“Going back to the casino to demand my money back because I was drunk and couldn’t consent to playing black jack.”

“Patriot navigation” @JohnDoyle @BlakeKresses

Women are getting bigger

RT @LancesLegion: "It is something great and greatening to cherish an ideal; to act in the light of truth that is far-away and far above; t…

“Yes I like saying unhinged things online”

“When will aggrieved urban populations get widespread judicial relief by allowing ‘mutual combat’ to be normalized?”