Cohost @FireInTheCosmos w/@sineadaw; Researcher Consciousness & 🛸, @viscollege (posts = my opinion); @VACfDisclosure, Ex-OSINT analyst

Leesburg, VA
My Visible College (@VisCollege) colleagues (shoutout to Andrew!) and I have organized our 3rd live multidisciplinary panel discussion on UFOs/UAP/NHI, taking place Wednesday, June 24 @ 6:30pm EDT (cash bar @ 5:30pm) in Washington, DC, the night before the @disclosurefound's stellar lineup for their 2026 Forum on Capitol Hill! "Reality Under Revision: Anomalous Phenomena & The Future of Inquiry" Moderated by @jfrickingfaulk, featured guests & panelists include: ✨ Ross Coulthart (@rosscoulthart: media/gov't) ✨ Maya Cowan, PhD (@uapmaya: anthropology) ✨ Steven Brown, PhD (philosophy) ✨ Marina Weiler, PhD (neuroscience/parapsychology) ✨ Rear Adm. (Ret) Tim Galladuet, PhD (@GallaudetTim: oceanography/gov't) ✨ Rizwan Virk, PhD (@Rizstanford: tech/computer science) This event is free and open to the public! If you're in town, join us for what promises to be a fascinating discussion!
If anomalous phenomena are real, what comes next? How will scholars navigate a post-disclosure world? Join us on 6/24 for an interdisciplinary dialogue on UAP, knowledge, uncertainty & the future of inquiry with leading scholars and public figures in the disclosure conversation.
4
9
32
4,287
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
Doomer Friday/Vanguard UFO Podathon with Matthew Brown, Dylan Borland & friends - Psicoactivo Live #67 x.com/i/broadcasts/1qxvveVyg…
1
12
55
1,941
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
🥚 Jake Barber Claim: A cylindrical mothership UFO in low-Earth orbit ejects egg-shaped craft that scout Earth and are sometimes manned by Gray aliens. 👽 Plus... Jesse: "You said in six months we would have a UFO land." Barber: "I have to tell you, Skywatcher was not unsuccessful." ~ Grusch on Rogan: "Depending on the size of the orb, it is conceivable that there's a physical craft behind it as well." Barber: "Behind most of the orbs, there's some technical apparatus." H/T: @pavelibarrameda ~ At The Beyond Institute UFO/UAP Conference Yesterday in Sweden... Harald (@derhavas): "[@jakebarber2025] said he recovered different kind of craft over time, and many of them were exotic. Not only the egg and not only the eightgon, but [different] kinds of exotic craft. And he said that many of them look like orbs in the sky or are invisible to the normal eye, but when they are grounded and when the energy goes away, they look quite different. They have different sizes and shapes, and he says that behind most of the orbs, there's some technical apparatus. Most of them [are] not aerodynamically shaped. And that many of them are not visible, but he's seen a lot of them and several of them [are] exotic." (Thanks for the effort and English, Harald. You speak better English than some Americans I know!) On Joe Rogan yesterday, David Grusch said this: Grusch: "Could the orbs actually be physical craft, but they have a sheath of plasma around it? Depending on the size of the orb, it is conceivable that there's a physical craft behind it as well, just as an artifact of the propulsion system. That's a theory. I'm sure The Program knows, and that will be communicated at a later date." (Were Grusch and Barber using the same source or were they sources for each other? Back to Barber in Sweden from yesterday, via Harald...) Harald: "And when [Barber] talked about his experiences behind the scenes - he didn't specify to whom, agencies and maybe other recovery people - he found out, or he was told, I think by an agency, he was told that the eggs are actually coming from a mothership in low orbit around Earth or in the high atmosphere. And this mothership has a cylindrical form, and it sometimes sheds eggs. They come out of it, and they scout Earth. And those eggs are sometimes unmanned, and sometimes they are manned. And if they are manned, they are manned by Grays." (As with the case with Grusch's claims, we need to know who the sources are (or source) for that claim and hear from them. And, of course, see the evidence.) ~ Here's more of Barber from the event yesterday... Jesse Michels- @AlchemyAmerican: "95% of [the interview we did with you in January of 2025) aged very well." (Such as?) Michels: "I have to call you out on the 5% that didn't age well, which is, you said in six months, Skywatcher was this sort of private initiative, and you had psionic assets, but you were going to do this in a, you know, obviously, way more humane way than Legacy Program did, where you were going to call in the UFO. And you said in six months we would have a UFO land. Any update there?" Barber: "Yeah, yeah, great question. So, I have to tell you, Skywatcher was not unsuccessful, but Skywatcher got very complicated." (So Barber is claiming Skywatcher was able to make a craft land?) Barber: "And, you know, I still believe wholeheartedly everything I've said, and my intentions and everything I've showed is going to continue to age very well. Where I was wrong was, obviously, in my optimistic timeline." (Why didn't he say this before Why wait so long? A simple post on Twitter/X would have helped a lot.) Barber: "And, you know, we have to work with our government. This is a very important point. Again, the impetus of us coming forward was entirely based on the Trump administration. We can't go rogue. We have to work with our government." (You can go rogue. Especially if the USG continues to give us scraps with these 6 releases.) Barber: "I mean...so we have to trust the institutions that are in place in this country, and our entire intent is to arm our leadership and our institutions with the information they need to disclose this to the public. You know, there's only so much you can do, privately, so it has to be done in coordination." (You can PUBLICLY demonstrate that you can lure craft (psionically or with an electronic dog whistle), and then bring one down to the ground. You don't need the government for that. I know, it's complicated, right? 😐) Barber: "And I am still loyal to that original, pledge and path, which was to give this administration and those in power first right of refusal to address this, because it's their responsibility to separate the wheat from the chaff, and I don't want the liability of it, either." (Shouldn't Skywatcher themselves separate the wheat from the chaff before making claims? And what liability? How people will react IF you can do this?) Barber: "So, I fully expect that everything that has happened the last 18 months now... I'm not gonna give you a time prediction because I've seen how slow...and we've all experienced how slow disclosure has happened. "We're seeing what is called the tranches now. We've seen the effort of our UAP Task Force, the congressional one. We've seen the roadblocks they've run into. But we're gonna continue to support them with the information we have and allow them to manage the complexities of disclosure. And so, I'm giving a lot of leeway and respect to those folks because I sincerely don't understand what they're going through, and I'm not gonna be the first one to stick my neck out when it comes to this, and overstep or do something reckless with the plan. " (This is serious backtrack from what he said when he first went public. And here's a reminder of his boldest claim.) Barber in January of 2025: "And all the questions. I'm talking about: What do the craft look like? How do they operate? Who is operating them? How are they being operated? And where are they coming from? We should be able to answer those questions, probably entirely, in the next 12 months." Source: x.com/TheUfoJoe/status/19571… ~ (If Skywatcher was involved in the luring operation @RepEricBurlison said was successful, and that comes out with all of the details, Barber and Skywatcher will be vindicated. Until then...)
The UAP Conference in Stockholm just ended. 16 people from Jesse Michels to Dylan Borland, from Beatriz Villarroel to Jeff Nuccetelli attended and talked. Jake Barber spoke remotely and dropped some heavy bombshells and intel.
40
32
250
28,811
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
Matt Brown spent his career inside the national security world without ever wearing a uniform. He came up through grad school and think tank work in DC, earned a TS/SCI clearance, and landed in the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Policy working the counter-WMD mission. From there he moved to the State Department. In August 2023 he walked into a Senate committee, signed his real name, and became a whistleblower on UAP. His report on a program called Immaculate Constellation was later entered into the congressional record. Today he co-runs Vanguard Enterprise, a nonprofit built to support the people who came forward after him. This conversation covers what pushed him over the edge. He says he saw transcripts showing the director of the Pentagon's UAP office was not telling senators the truth. He explains how the counter-WMD mission gave him a legitimate reason to see collection on objects around nuclear assets, and what he saw on those systems, from small orbs going in and out of water to a large triangle and a boomerang that disappeared behind its own light. We cover the reality of blowing the whistle inside the IC, the retaliation he describes, and the questions he thinks Congress should be asking now.
31
76
419
80,721
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
I knew Mr. Grusch saw crash retrieval operations showing craft and their occupants of nonhuman origin in the form of video/photographs but he takes it further on @joerogan Let’s keep pushing @POTUS for protection/immunity so Dave and others can reveal locations of said evidence as we all want full transparency. youtu.be/dYPXINFcvmI
141
201
1,980
61,769
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
BREAKING: Podesta *confirms* discussing UAP with Gen McCasland (AFRL), Weiss (ex-Lockheed Skunk Works head) and DeLonge in 2016. Now why would McCasland, Weiss (and USAF Gen Carey) talk UAP with Podesta? Lockheed widely alleged to possess retrieved UAP. Bravo, @SchreckReports
NEW: John Podesta responds to David Grusch’s claims from yesterday's Joe Rogan interview. In an email to PARADIGM, Podesta acknowledged participating in a call to discuss "amongst other things, declassifying DOD files and reducing the stigma of professionals taking UAP’s seriously" with Blink-182 frontman Tom DeLonge, retired Air Force Gen. Neil McCasland, and Rob Weiss, then-head of Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works. But Podesta contested Grusch's claim that it was part of a broader "acclimatization" effort to prepare society for the truth about UFOs ahead of the 2016 election. Link below with more details...
15
61
314
14,885
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
New Matt Brown interview just dropped. 👀
Matt Brown spent his career inside the national security world without ever wearing a uniform. He came up through grad school and think tank work in DC, earned a TS/SCI clearance, and landed in the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Policy working the counter-WMD mission. From there he moved to the State Department. In August 2023 he walked into a Senate committee, signed his real name, and became a whistleblower on UAP. His report on a program called Immaculate Constellation was later entered into the congressional record. Today he co-runs Vanguard Enterprise, a nonprofit built to support the people who came forward after him. This conversation covers what pushed him over the edge. He says he saw transcripts showing the director of the Pentagon's UAP office was not telling senators the truth. He explains how the counter-WMD mission gave him a legitimate reason to see collection on objects around nuclear assets, and what he saw on those systems, from small orbs going in and out of water to a large triangle and a boomerang that disappeared behind its own light. We cover the reality of blowing the whistle inside the IC, the retaliation he describes, and the questions he thinks Congress should be asking now.
6
21
195
10,822
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
I heard this from Matt at @UfosAroundWorld first and I dismissed it. Apologies for that. According to the info, @jakebarber2025 and Dave are working together on this.
David Grusch tells Joe Rogan he briefed Congress on a U.S. Govt operation that trafficks children for money “under the cover of certain national security programs”
8
8
108
5,376
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
Podesta’s response to Grusch is interesting. He doesn’t categorically deny providing “top cover” for an alleged UAP acclimatization/popularization effort. Instead: “That is probably not how I would characterize our interaction” and “My recollection is…” It’s a carefully qualified response that leaves the central allegation - whether Podesta authorized, approved or facilitated such an effort - unresolved in my opinion.
NEW: John Podesta responds to David Grusch’s claims from yesterday's Joe Rogan interview. In an email to PARADIGM, Podesta acknowledged participating in a call to discuss "amongst other things, declassifying DOD files and reducing the stigma of professionals taking UAP’s seriously" with Blink-182 frontman Tom DeLonge, retired Air Force Gen. Neil McCasland, and Rob Weiss, then-head of Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works. But Podesta contested Grusch's claim that it was part of a broader "acclimatization" effort to prepare society for the truth about UFOs ahead of the 2016 election. Link below with more details...
12
31
171
31,521
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
There have been flags around this from the get-go. Caution and research is important prior to platforming people and their perspectives, especially when they claim some form of exclusive insight.
1
4
88
Anyone else concerned or looking into this? It’s important to know what/who is guiding an organization’s vision and mission. If their views have changed, that’s fine, but it’s important to address. express.co.uk/news/weird/890…
Replying to @SunOfAbramelin
Thanks for sharing, Matthew. I’d like to hear from @humaninstitute1 & @uapcoalition about a few concerns I have after interactions with their leadership prior to either one’s launch: 1) What is their view on / relationship with Allies of Humanity (@earthallies), its mission, and their framing of NHI contact & experiencers based on the alleged channeled transmissions received by Marshall Summers? 2) How would they define “human sovereignty/security”? 3) (this is an important one) How would they define “ethical contact with NHI,” and why do they suggest there should be hierarchical rules in place for an individual’s contact with other consciousness? Are they opposed to individual sovereignty as it relates to consciousness? Who would be in charge of telling an individual how to “have contact”? Would there be repercussions for “unethical” contact? 4) How would they react to the thousands of experiencer accounts that may clash on some of the details of Marshall Summers’ “transmissions” — do they believe those are all “deception” or “distortion,” but not Summers’?
3
8
674
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
Jay Stratton: “I Can Tell You A Lot More Than People Think” | Monday UFO Live x.com/i/broadcasts/1oJMvNjkd…
17
29
150
7,840
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
1/3 Yale historian of religion and Disclosure Foundation Advisory Board Member Dr. Carlos Eire [paraphrase]: "If in fact disclosure brings us credible evidence that there do indeed exist non-human intelligences, religion will not disappear. Instead, religion will find a way to incorporate this phenomenon into the fold." Dr. Eire's comment was in response to a question pertaining to his involvement in this past June's Disclosure Forum, where Eire presented a lecture titled Religious Implications: The Impossible Made Real - How societies function when confronted with ideas once deemed impossible, and what disclosure asks of existing religious and scientific frameworks. Disclosure would inevitably raise profound questions for the world’s religious traditions. But as Dr. Eire suggests, the confirmation of non-human intelligence need not mean the end of religion. It may instead expand how humanity understands creation and our place within it.
4
7
25
2,257
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
If AI knows it can't trust itself, what are we doing? jennicevilhauer.substack.com…. #AI #Psychology
2
2
3
253
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
Liberation Times has previously reported allegations about a program named Golden Domes. A source claimed it used electronic and laser-based systems to bring down what the source described as ‘exotic non-human vehicles’. The source said former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and his principal deputy, Stephanie O’Sullivan, oversaw the program.
Liberation Times put Coulthart’s claim directly to the White House. We asked: ‘Has President Trump, as Commander-in-Chief, issued any order, directive or authorization permitting U.S. military personnel to shoot down UAP, UFOs, unidentified “orbs” or other unidentified airborne objects?’
2
32
154
15,137
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
Liberation Times put Coulthart’s claim directly to the White House. We asked: ‘Has President Trump, as Commander-in-Chief, issued any order, directive or authorization permitting U.S. military personnel to shoot down UAP, UFOs, unidentified “orbs” or other unidentified airborne objects?’
NEW: White House Leaves UFO Shootdown Claims Unanswered liberationtimes.com/home/whi…
15
93
28,267
Despite disagreeing with his assessment on crash retrieval/reverse engineering efforts, I agree with D. Dean Johnson’s point here that these were glaringly left out of what was otherwise a great synopsis and status update on the White House-launched UAP Governance Board & UAP Science Advisory Council. It featured several interesting quotes from Council members like @ProfAviLoeb, @GarryPNolan, Peter Skafish, @haqqmisra, and @JenniceVilhauer, as well as Administration officials. politico.com/news/magazine/2…
POLITICO'S UFO ARTICLE: INTERESTING QUOTES & MISSING CLAIMS Today's 5,000-word POLITICO article (9-26-26), "Trump Promised the Truth about UFOs; These Scientists Are Waiting," by freelance journalist Ilan Greenberg, is worth reading. The focus of the article is Prof. Avi Loeb's UAP Science Advisory Council (UAPSAC) and its role in the complicated emerging architecture of the Trump Administration's "UAP transparency" enterprise. The article contains substantial new material on those matters, including interesting quotes from spokespersons for the White House, the Pentagon, and the CIA. However, I noticed that Greenberg avoided any mention of multiple high-profile claims that the government (or government-affiliated contractors) possess not only "raw data," "files," "records," or "evidence" regarding anomalous devices operating on this planet, but also actual nonhuman craft/devices, exotic debris, and/or bodies. At least five members of Prof. Loeb's 20-member UAPSAC have publicly promoted or lent credence to some such stories; two of those UAPSAC members were quoted in the article, but neither was quoted about their captive-alien-tech beliefs. Also absent from Greenberg's article are the names of any of the persons publicly claiming personal knowledge regarding government possession of alien technology, including David Grusch, who employed the statutory whistleblower process, and an array of self-styled whistleblowers who have surfaced since 2023. Moreover, a number of members of the House of Representatives have associated themselves with some of those captive-alien-tech claims, and prodding from that group of lawmakers has been a significant factor leading to the Trump Administration's current UAP-related initiatives. Given those connections, it does seem odd to me that Greenberg did not include at least a summary of the captive-alien-tech claims. (As my regular readers know, personally I am generally skeptical of captive-alien-tech claims; I regard a number of the best-known UFO-crash tales as thoroughly discredited hoaxes, and a number of the current crop of "whistleblowers" as credulous, deluded, or straight-up LAPRing phonies. But I also fully support the full exercise of lawful presidential authorities, which on national security matters are extensive, to get to the bottom of UFO-crash and "legacy program" stories, and disclose the results. Whether any such full exercise is underway now within the Trump Administration remains to be seen--but if it is not really happening, I think it is nonsense to blame it on entrenched bureaucrat-gatekeepers whom the President and his cabinet secretaries are mysteriously powerless to identify and fire or move out of the way.) A provocative alternative viewpoint is expressed in quotes that Greenberg obtained from Ohio State University Prof. Alexander Wendt, author of the forthcoming book The Last Humans: UFOs, Global Security, and the Threat to State Sovereignty: "'The good news is they’re not going to get any data' [Wendt said, referring to the UAPSAC]... The bad news, however, is if the council does get its data and announces the presence of alien intelligence on earth, Wendt believes it’s almost certainly the end of civilization as we know it.... Wendt would like to see a 25-to-50-year news blackout to prepare the public." politico.com/news/magazine/2…
171
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
Tim Burchett says Stephen Miller called him from the White House... "Bad people in the deep state are blocking the release of UFO files." My guest's response: "From my observation, it is true."
115
209
1,181
123,676
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
The call to action is clear: appeal to Trump’s closest public-facing media confidants (with a direct line to Trump) using only the most legitimate of UFO insiders/whistleblowers. The requests: (1) remove public-facing NDAs so WBs can openly share what they know with the public, and (2) give the disclosure speech which we know is already written. All hands on deck.
10
31
204
4,975
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
We’re still asking the White House: release us from our secrecy obligations and provide protections to the UAP whistleblowers.
Please grant immunity and protection to the brave whistleblowers like David Grusch sir, the American people deserve the full truth. nypost.com/2026/09/19/us-new…
44
132
795
45,326
🌹🛸Anthony 🇱🇧 🌍 retweeted
Six days after a hard landing, SpaceShipOne astronaut Brian Binnie described a dozen glowing spheres in his backyard. Kevin Curran and Matt Stinemetze join Ryan Graves to share his story on the new Safe Aerospace Podcast. Watch the trailer. Full episode below.
Made with AI
15
47
331
55,008