CELL maximalist
- Tweets 1,325
- Following 2,076
- Followers 1,813
- Likes 1,386
Cellframe Social retweeted
JUST IN: BlackRock declares AI agents could soon use stablecoins to buy computing power & data without waiting for humans to complete the transaction.
258
461
3,961
222,016
The next generation of blockchain is post-quantum
nitter.net/i/spaces/1MJgNbqdgdMGL
4
8
29
410
Elite panel on crypto and politics speaking now, come and learn with us! nitter.net/i/spaces/1vKpPNWvdmaKE
8
22
403
Cellframe Social retweeted
FIRST SPACE: Post-Quantum Crypto 🎙️
What happens when a valid signature can no longer prove that your crypto is yours?
Which wallets break first?
What does “quantum-safe” actually mean?
And who is protecting users today, not someday?
🗣️ @InsightXHQ @ShiftRWA @LighthouseWeb3 + 4 more!
This Thursday, we’re getting answers!
12
18
45
3,242
Coinbase's head of cryptography says there probably won't be ONE post quantum signature everyone uses. 👀
So they're building custody for whatever BTC picks.
Meanwhile in @cellframenet : multiple PQ algos at the base layer since day one. New ones plug in, no fork.
We been knew. 🫡
$CELL
10
26
62
2,105
Cellframe Social retweeted
🚨 NEW SPACE
Crypto has no borders. Politics does.
But regulation, elections and policy decisions are increasingly shaping what gets built, where capital moves, and who gets access.
Tomorrow, we’re bringing projects from across Web3 together for Crypto Politics - a conversation about what happens when a global industry collides with local rules.
🗓 September 24
⏰ 2 PM UTC
🤝 Co-hosted with @Growthy_Web3
Featuring:
@linkalabs
@Magne_AI
@vs1_finance
@cellframenet
@PinGoAI
@aetheriumX_fun
@geoffreymccabe
@ULTILAND
@blubird_app
Set a reminder. See you tomorrow. 🎙️
2
6
20
2,402
There's gonna be some serious "spectacle" if we don't build the infrastructure post-quantum!
LATEST: ⚡ Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire declared "the spectacle era of crypto is over" as blockchain becomes "invisible infrastructure."
"The most important technologies in history disappear into the background."
1
11
28
819
Cellframe Social retweeted
It just feels like a good day to tell you; 𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐡𝐲 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐚𝐝 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐮𝐩𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞. 👍🏼
There's a reason top tier projecs line @cellframenet built a smarter way to handle post-quantum security without gambling on one standard:
• Native at the Base: Post-quantum cryptography running directly in the core primitives from block zero.
• Simultaneous Signatures: Multiple post-quantum algorithms running side by side instead of forcing everyone into one box.
• Zero-Fork Evolution: New signature schemes can be added over time without splitting the chain or shutting down services.
By doing so, you don't need to guess which algorithm survives the next decade when your architecture is built to adapt on the fly.
And speaking of fly, watch this space 👉🏼 $CELL 😉📈
#Cellframe #Gem
4
9
45
606
Quantum threat to blockchain is not the same as AI doom marketing. One is mathematics, the other a phantasy
1
7
28
621
Cellframe Social retweeted
$NOX just broke out of a month-long falling wedge — and I don't think the timing could be much more interesting.
NØNOS is no longer just a “privacy OS idea.”
They've built a sovereign OS from scratch with a hardened microkernel, capability-controlled apps, verified boot, STARK-attested capsules, post-quantum signing, privacy networking, real hardware support, an expanding Rust ecosystem, and an economic layer being built around $NOX.
v0.9.2 is now pre-release with 87 verified capsules, reproducible builds, stronger kernel protections and major security improvements.
And they're getting close to the part that matters most: turning all this engineering into a product outsiders can actually use and build on.
Next comes the new website, full technical documentation and their biggest roadmap yet:
6 months. 5 releases. A clear path through the remaining work.
And that's before the bigger potential catalysts: beta → audits → funding → team expansion → broader hardware support → external developers → NOX Shield → users → PMF.
Now imagine this happening during a real privacy + cybersecurity + AI/Web3 bull cycle.
The market starts looking for privacy infrastructure while NØNOS is sitting there building an entire sovereign computing stack.
Not another privacy app.
The OS underneath the apps, wallets, agents, nodes and infrastructure.
That's why the upside thesis gets crazy from micro-cap territory.
People hear “100x” and think that's the endgame.
For me, 100x would only be the market beginning to price in the possibility that NØNOS becomes something much bigger.
Obviously they still have to execute, get independently audited and attract real users.
But if they actually reach PMF?
The ceiling is nowhere near 100x.
We recorded the first NØNOS tutorial: booting the 0.9.2 pre-release on macOS under QEMU with a software TPM and networking.
You fetch the image, verify its hash and boot it. 61 capsules are attested at spawn before the compositor starts. * One failure would stop the boot *
Full thread on what this release actually changed and what it does not yet do.
🧵
12
21
48
6,580
One of them is a problem for whoever developed the first problematic product.
The other one is yours.
And the gap is huge.
Stop wasting time. Quantum is coming. Go see for yourself. @cellframenet
ethereum:0x26c8afbbfe1ebaca03c2bb082e69d0476bffe099
4
27
93
620
Cellframe Social retweeted
We Are Cell! We Are Here! We Are Ready! $CELL #Cellframe #QuantumComputing #Crypto #Bitcoin #Binance @elonmusk
With recent powerful mentions from industry leaders about quantum computing, Cellframe Network is leading the way. @cellframenet news.bitcoin.com/cellframe-n…
33
37
156
3,680
Converting Bitcoin miners to AI data centers is already big business. As the AI industry fragments beyond a few big players, blockchain-enabled agile markets for compute will emerge. CELLFRAME was built for this.
zerohedge.com/ai/bitdeer-lan…
1
9
41
924
Bitcoin™ - "We can protect certain funds"
Bitcoin just got its first real-world test against a threat that doesn’t even exist yet.
StarkWare has successfully mined a quantum-resistant Bitcoin transaction on mainnet without a fork or any change to Bitcoin’s consensus rules.
The transaction used a method called Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB), developed by StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy.
It was only a 10,000-satoshi output, and the experiment wasn’t cheap or simple. The transaction required specialized computation and had to be sent directly to MARA’s Slipstream service because normal Bitcoin nodes wouldn’t relay its non-standard format.
So no, Bitcoin isn’t suddenly “quantum-proof.”
But that’s not really the point.
The important part is that we now have a working demonstration that Bitcoin can protect certain funds from future quantum attacks without immediately rewriting the protocol.
5
20
1,054
"The last time governments funded a technology before markets would? Semiconductors, 1960s, when the Pentagon bought 100% of all chips produced. Ask how that aged."
QUANTUM IS COMING
Can we make the argument of how anyone can still be so bearish on quantum technology?
Yes, we get the valuation argument and for most we totally agree, though when (not if) quantum works out, they'll all be severely UNDER valued.
But quantum isn't the same industry as it was from 2022-2024.
We've completely changed the landscape as governments are committing BILLIONS to individual quantum companies.
The US signed $2 billion in CHIPS Act deals with 9 quantum companies, taking ownership stakes in each such as $INFQ and ethereum:0x4a220e6096b25eadb88358cb44068a3248254675 Illinois put $500M into a quantum campus. Australia put nearly a billion into PsiQuantum alone. Japan built its first national quantum computer around $INFQ processor. The UK committed £2.5B. Canada backed $XNDU today with an over $160 million dollar package. The House just voted to raise military quantum spending 68%.
AI never got this, OpenAI and DeepMind were built on private money but Washington never felt the same urgency. Quantum is getting state capital, equity stakes, and national programs BEFORE the breakout. Every major government independently reached the same conclusion: they cannot afford to be left out.
The last time governments funded a technology before markets would? Semiconductors, 1960s, when the Pentagon bought 100% of all chips produced. Ask how that aged.
$IONQ $INFQ ethereum:0x4a220e6096b25eadb88358cb44068a3248254675 $QBTS
3
8
50
1,852
Cellframe Social retweeted
A recent arXiv paper from a Tsinghua-led group reported trapping 11,000 individual atoms in a tweezer array generated by a single metasurface (~2 cm diameter). That is described as the first time any quantum-computing platform has reached the tens-of-thousands scale in available physical qubits. The metasurface replaces microscope objectives, improves laser-power efficiency, and sits outside the vacuum cell (working distance ~1.5 cm). The randomly loaded array was analyzed with percolation theory. This directly attacks the “how many identical atoms can you trap and address?” bottleneck for neutral-atom machines. Related earlier/parallel metasurface tweezer work has demonstrated even larger site counts (tens to hundreds of thousands of foci), though loaded-atom records remain lower. arxiv.org/html/2606.02715v1
2
8
17
1,776
Only robust crypto-agile systems will be fit to make it through the 2030s
Compounding AI x quantum progress means that upgrading cybersecurity will become a permanent process.
Ossified cryptography is bound to turn into a liability. Only robust crypto-agile system will be fit to make it through the 2030s.
3
8
37
1,448
Quantum is coming
Can a sufficiently powerful quantum computer forge the signatures used to authorize Bitcoin and Ethereum transactions? What would it take to upgrade both networks before that happens?
In this new lecture, Stanford cryptographer @danboneh explores why blockchains may turn to signatures built from hash functions. He also presents new research on threshold signing.
The talk ends with the questions Bitcoin still has to answer, including whether post-quantum signatures will require larger blocks, what happens to abandoned coins, and how someone such as Satoshi could prove ownership after Bitcoin’s current signatures have been retired.
00:00 Why blockchains need to prepare for quantum computers
03:05 Why Bitcoin may bet on hash-based signatures
06:25 The “big footgun” in stateful signatures
08:58 A quantum-safe signature that takes one billion hashes
14:13 Inside SLH-DSA’s virtual tree
20:30 How Bitcoin and Ethereum could make the switch
23:48 What happens when a wallet loses its state?
32:47 Can threshold signing survive the quantum transition?
36:39 How to hide lattice cryptography from the blockchain
38:49 Why threshold one-time signatures seem impossible
45:36 How context prevents forged signatures
49:37 The forgotten idea behind Winternitz signatures
54:50 Turning one-time signatures into threshold signatures
1:04:27 Will quantum-safe signatures require bigger Bitcoin blocks?
1:06:26 Abandoned bitcoin and Satoshi’s recovery problem
1
9
25
913
