This Government is an Islamist appeasing disgrace

You should be ashamed of yourself.

So stunning and brave 🙄. Appalling decision by our Prime Minister, choosing to put posturing for his left wing MPs and Muslim voters ahead of Britain's national interests.

Royal Navy major combatants status.

So we have a Govt. that hates white men but wants them to go to war for them, then will abandon them if they make it home and then make them live under the threat of litigation for trumped up ‘war crimes’ and potentially call them up again just before retirement? Fuck off.

No, Tom. Shut the fuck up and listen, Tom... The man walked into that gilded snake pit at Davos and eviscerated the entire globalist cabal with the cold, unflinching precision of a predator who’s done toying with prey. On their stage. Under their lights. Broadcast on their networks. Forced every last one of them...those smug, self-appointed overlords...to sit in silence while he carved their rotten empire to the bone. He didn’t scream. He didn’t need to. His voice was low, steady, absolute. Every sentence a kill shot. He exposed the climate hoax for the multi-trillion-dollar wealth transfer it is. He named the open-borders agenda as the deliberate dilution of sovereign nations. He called out the currency wars, the offshoring scams, the engineered collapse of Western industry...all of it orchestrated by the same parasites who lecture the rest of us about “sustainability” while burning jet fuel to fly their private fleets into Switzerland for a week of mutual back-patting and champagne. This wasn’t anger. This was execution. They perched there in their tailored hypocrisy...cashmere sweaters, bespoke suits, faces frozen in that practiced mask of enlightened concern...while the President of the United States looked them dead in the eye and ended their charade. Politely. Ruthlessly. He informed them, in plain language, that the days of America bankrolling their utopian delusions, their population-replacement schemes, their digital surveillance grid, their endless wars for “democracy”...all of it funded by the American taxpayer...are finished. Done. Over. He put the entire Davos class...the unelected technocrats, the hedge-fund vampires, the NGO grifters, the media courtesans...on explicit notice: your reign of unchallenged arrogance is terminated. We see every tentacle of your operation. We know exactly what you are: a parasitic elite that has feasted on the productive class for decades while selling the corpse back to us as “progress.” What you diagnose as “mental disturbance” is what unfiltered strength looks like to cowards who’ve spent their lives groveling before power. What you label “embarrassing” is the sound of a sovereign people finally refusing to kneel. What you find “dangerous” is the sight of your entire worldview collapsing in real time, live on global television, delivered by a man who cannot be bought, bullied, or bribed. He didn’t just address that room. He spoke past them...directly to the hundreds of millions who’ve been looted, lectured, and lied to by these people. To every factory worker whose job was shipped overseas. To every parent watching their child’s school being turned into an indoctrination camp. To every citizen tired of watching their borders erased while billionaires build moats around their own compounds. That audience of predators just witnessed the beginning of their obsolescence. They felt it...the shift in the air, the sudden realization that the protection racket they’ve run for fifty years has a new sheriff, and he’s not asking nicely anymore. They know what’s coming. They felt the ground move under their feet. And they’re terrified. So go ahead, Tom. Keep clutching your pearls. Keep diagnosing from your safe, sanitized distance. The rest of us recognize the sound of history correcting itself. Sleep lightly. The reckoning isn’t coming. It’s already here.

Please stop sharing this footage of the protesters in Iran. We should not be publicly shaming those who are suffering from internalised Islamophobia.

The lefty media going potty at #Trump. So far hes ended the fighting in #Gaza He’s tried to end the war in #Ukraine He calmed #India & #Pakistan. He’s sealed the US southern border & started to remove some of the 20,000,000 illegals Biden let in. He’s uncovered a gigantic Somali grift in #Minnesota He’s donked the #Iran nuclear programme, which was preparing to wipe out #Israel. He’s got European #Nato to start paying its way. He’s correcting the US trade deficit with #tariffs US GDP is growing at 4.3% He’s arrested #Maduro a #Venezuela narco criminal who was flooding America with drugs & criminals. He’s about to get Venezuelan oil flowing for the benefit of the Venezuelan people & US oil companies, thus locking out Russia & China. He’s grounding Russias illegal shadow fleet. He’s threatened the Islamist mullahs in Iran, to not shoot the #Persian people, who want their country back. He’s looking to secure #Greenland and its mineral riches & strategic location for the benefit of the West & not #Russia or China I think he’s doing a heck of a job. Compare that to the 18 months of shixte we’ve had from #KeirStarmer #POTUS #DonaldTrump #Maga

The BBC hasn't covered anything from Iran in 24 hours on its website. But the World News section does have stories about mountain gorilla twins being born, a power outage in Berlin and 'hate speech' laws in India. Ah well.

Share if you believe in home-grown food and hardworking British farmers! 🚜 🇬🇧

And please - if you can. This work is not easy. Please support my hard hitting and unique research. Help to fight back. Subscribe on X or support my Patreon- patreon.com/davidcollier or donate via PayPal/CC paypal.com/paypalme/davidhco… …… - thank you!!!! END

“The Church of England is not defending the Gospel, it is defending its public image.” @BishopDewar

Andrew Neil is right. “Net Zero is the most costly self-inflicted wound in modern British history.”

Low carb saved my life.

Seeing mountains of condemnation of Sarah Pochin by political opponents. I don't think they realise how the mood has shifted in this country over the past couple of years and why they will get very little cut-through. Not because everyone has suddenly turned racist (they haven't). Nor because Pochin's words weren't clumsy (they certainly were). But most people's view will be: "Yes, she phrased it poorly, but we all watch television, and we know that her underlying point - that the demographics in TV and advertising are so skewed that it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that we are being subjected to a relentless political lecture - was undeniably correct. What's more, the charge of 'racist' is tossed out so casually these days, it has been rendered largely meaningless." That's how millions will see it. And for that reason, it won't affect Reform's standing in the polls one jot.

Oh look, here he is! We found him for you @metpoliceuk. Now do your job and arrest him.

The Tufts nutrition recommendations are unhealthy and will harm me if I follow them. You shouldn't either. osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/eu… @TuftsNutrition

Politics must remain separate from medical discourse. Those who practise or influence health care, including individuals active in political life, should possess a deep grounding in ethics and the history of ethical practice. This should not be reserved for later professional training but embedded in early education and made central to core curricula. The history that led to the Nuremberg trials, and the principles that emerged from them, must be studied alongside pivotal demonstrations such as the Milgram experiment, which revealed how readily ordinary people can abandon moral responsibility and conform to authority or group think/pressure. Such lessons underscore that safeguarding ethics in medicine is essential to protect individuals from the consequences of collective compliance and political interference. The Born in Bradford study provides one of the clearest demonstrations that consanguinity is not a neutral cultural practice. Consanguinity is a major direct determinant of childhood health, survival, and lifelong wellbeing. First cousin marriages were shown to double the rate of congenital anomalies compared to the national average, with nearly one third of all congenital abnormalities in the cohort directly attributable to blood-related unions. This translated into strikingly elevated infant mortality, with local reviews in Bradford, Birmingham, and Redbridge attributing between 20 and 40 per cent of child deaths to genetic disorders associated with consanguinity. The biological mechanism is well established: inheritance of a greater proportion of recessive mutations within closed kinship structures, often compounded by repeated endogamy across generations. This mechanism results not only in structural, sensory, and neurological disorders but also in measurable reductions in IQ, a factor that carries lifelong implications for educational attainment, independence, and employment prospects. These outcomes collectively constitute a heavy burden on children who inherit risks they did not choose, while families and health systems shoulder the consequences in resource demand and care provision. The ethical implications are profound. It is not a rejection of the equal worth of individuals with disability, chronic illness, or lower IQ to assert that knowingly amplifying the probability of these outcomes is wrong. Every child has a moral right to be born with the best possible chance of health, and to deliberately increase the risk of preventable disease, cognitive disadvantage, and early death violates that principle. IQ and health capacity are not abstract markers but practical determinants of survival, opportunity, and quality of life. At a societal level, repeated consanguinity reduces average IQ, lowers productivity, and sustains cycles of poverty. At an individual level, it consigns children to avoidable hardship and dependency. Respect for cultural tradition cannot outweigh the rights of the most vulnerable. The persistence of high rates of consanguineous marriage, even after evidence has shown its consequences, reflects not cultural preservation but an ethical failure to protect children from foreseeable and preventable suffering. Dr Isabella D. Cooper References: Small, N., Kelly, B., Malawsky, D. S., Lodh, R., Oddie, S., & Wright, J. (2024). Mortality, morbidity and educational outcomes in children of consanguineous parents in the Born in Bradford cohort. Wellcome Open Research, 9. doi.org/10.12688/WELLCOMEOPE… Zlotogora, J., & Shalev, S. A. (2010). The consequences of consanguinity on the rates of malformations and major medical conditions at birth and in early childhood in inbred populations. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 152(8), 2023–2028. doi.org/10.1002/AJMG.A.33537 Masefield, S. C., Prady, S. L., Sheldon, T. A., Small, N., Jarvis, S., & Pickett, K. E. (2022). The Effects of Caring for Young Children with Developmental Disabilities on Mothers’ Health and Healthcare Use: Analysis of Primary Care Data in the Born in Bradford Cohort. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 34(1), 67–87. doi.org/10.1007/S10882-021-0…