Community Manager | Editor | Discord Audits Moderator - @QwertiAI | @Fuglysart | @AG_Protocol Ambassador - @RaylsLabs @GoKiteAI SBT Winner | @zama NFT Winner

Pinned Tweet
In the last 2 years I made around $20k from Web3 opportunities... And Finally I Decided To Tell My Web3 Story :) Two years ago I stepped into Web3 with curiosity, zero guarantees, and a simple belief... if you learn fast and move smart, the internet can change your life. Today I want to share my real numbers and the projects that helped shape my journey. Not to flex... But to show what’s possible when you work smart in the right place So first of all lets go with my 2025 drops :) ➥ Space and Time — $340 ➥ Rayls — $308 ➥ Dogs — $422 ➥ Magic Newton — $620 ➥ Hamster Kombat — $125 ➥ Meme Core — $412 ➥ Chain Opera — $512 ( If you know… you know. This could have been $10K+ 🙃) ➥ Story Protocol — $1.2K ➥ Walrus — $2.3K ➥ Kite AI — $1.5K ➥ Common Dot XYZ — $1.4K (including NFTs) ➥ Magic Eden — $4.3K There were also many smaller drops under $100 that I didn’t include here. So all these mentioned earnings in 2025 will round up around $13,439 Another thing to mention is that this doesn’t even include my ➥ Mod Salaries ➥ Collaboration Salaries ➥ Presale Profits ➥ Event Wins ➥ Community Rewards Those also paid well and gave me something even more valuable... connections and opportunities :) Now With My 2026 DROPS So Far :) ➥ OFC — $120 (Vesting monthly for 9 months, so more coming) ➥ Superteam Bounties — $145 (and still ongoing) ➥ Fogo — $850 ➥ Zama — $3.2K (2 ZAMA NFTs) And these sums up around $4,315 So if we combine these drops from 2025 and 2026, I got around... $17,754 from these Web3 opportunities. And remember… This is without counting mod salaries, presale flips, and other rewards mentioned above. But the money is only part of the story, Cauz Web3 didn’t just give me income. It gave me freedom... like freedom to ➥ Work on my own schedule ➥ Spend real time with the loved one's ➥ Go to the gym and give priority to my health ➥ Travel to many places ➥ Build my business in real life ➥ Meet incredible people worldwide No alarm clocks for a job I hate. No rat race. No trading 12 hours of my life for survival. And that made me realize something powerful... A construction worker wakes up before sunrise, destroys his body for 12 hours, sacrifices his health… yet still struggles to survive. The world was never about who works the hardest. It’s about what you choose to work hard on. Web3 rewards curiosity. Speed. Networking. And smart positioning. Not just brute effort. I’m still learning. Still grinding. Still exploring. Let’s see where this journey ends by 2026 year end. Maybe much higher. But even if it doesn’t, as a 22 year old Web3 already changed my life :)
155
16
471
27,364
Question for the team @AlexJupiter23 @myaksetig @mcvviriato I reproduced the Sovereign → Public leg locally... Lock → MessageDispatched → Public mirror mint. On the reverse test, teleportToPrivacyNode was submitted, but my single-node local Axyl instance kept advancing consensus while execution stayed at execution_round=0 So I never got a mined receipt. For an end to end reverse bridge test, is the single-node setup expected to support this path, or is the 4 validator Axyl local testnet the recommended topology?
2
432
A blockchain prototype can look great in a demo and still fail the bank's architecture review. The question I kept coming back to while reading the @RaylsLabs Sovereign docs was: Where does the bank's own ledger actually run? For an institution, that's an architecture decision, not just a blockchain decision.
20
70
2,353
And this isn't just a conceptual bridge. The documented Public Chain path uses teleportToPublicChain() to lock the token and dispatch the message. A separate public relayer processes it, while the RN contract family handles the Public Chain connection. The caller also has to be a registered user.
1
12
502
That's the part I find interesting :) The institution isn't choosing between: Private or Public It can keep its own ledger and controls while selectively connecting activity to where it needs to settle or access public liquidity. That's a very different architectural question from simply asking: “Can a bank use blockchain ?” What part of this private to public boundary would matter most to a bank? Sources: docs.rayls.com/docs/a-warm-i… docs.rayls.com/docs/connecti…
13
510
I think one of the most interesting things about Rayls Sovereign is what happens when a private bank asset needs public liquidity. Imagine a bank has a $100M tokenized deposit. The bank wants that deposit to access public blockchain liquidity. But there is one problem :( It does not want the underlying deposit to leave its own environment. This is where Rayls Sovereign gets interesting. The deposit can first be registered and activated for the public chain route. Then, instead of sending the deposit away, the bank locks it inside its own Rayls Sovereign ledger. The bridge then sends a message to the Rayls Public Chain. A corresponding stablecoin is minted there against that locked collateral, backed 1:1. The resulting stablecoin can then reach dApps, liquidity pools and counterparties on the Public Chain. But the original deposit is still sitting inside the institution's perimeter. So the flow looks like this ⤵️ Private deposit ⇩ Lock inside Sovereign ⇩ Stablecoin minted on Public Chain ⇩ Public liquidity ⇩ Stablecoin burned ⇩ Deposit unlocked And there is another detail I found interesting. This isn't routed through the Rayls Private Network Hub. The Sovereign ledger connects directly to the Public Chain through a separate public relayer and the RN contract system. So the institution gets a bridge between two very different worlds : ➥ Private control on one side ➥ Public liquidity on the other Without moving the underlying collateral out of the institution's perimeter. That is a very different way of thinking about tokenization. It's not just putting an asset onchain. It's deciding which part needs to be public, and which part should stay private. I went through the @RaylsLabs docs to understand this flow properly and checked Sovereign to Public Chain docs too If you want to dig deeper, here is the source ⤵️ docs.rayls.com/docs/rayls-no…
35
31
150
11,134
I just locked in my $RLS stake on the @RaylsLabs Public Chain today. The network is fully live, but moving from Ethereum to a delegated position requires a specific sequence of bridging, gas acquisition, and validator selection. I documented my exact workflow to show you how to do it end to end without getting stuck. 🧵
23
9
57
3,494
Step 5: Rewards & Claiming Depending on your wallet type, your yield will reflect either the standard rate (~18% APY) or the pre commit incentive rate (~55% APY). Rewards accrue continuously :) You can hit Claim anytime to transfer accumulated rewards to your wallet without interrupting your active principal stake.
1
5
594
Step 6: Unstaking & The 14-Day Rule If you decide to unstake, Rayls enforces a 14-day unbonding period (as I tested myself) During these 14 days, your tokens cease earning yield and remain locked until the cooldown concludes. You can independently verify your transactions and validator performance on the Rayls Explorer: explorer.rayls.com/ Always verify contract parameters and DYOR!
6
621