.When asked on Wed if a concurrent provincial election would reduce municipal voter turnout,
@Dave_Eby told
@stephenquinntv this:
Eby: "[It}will give an opportunity for local govt leaders to pick a side...Are they on the side for their communities, building out the infrastructure, the roads, the ports...Or are they advocates and supporters of the Conservative approach...?"
Quinn: "You’re asking them to take sides, then. Either they support you or they support the Conservatives. Is that what you’re saying?"
Eby: "Absolutely not, Stephen. [What] direction do these local leaders want to take their communities?"
[cites tariff impacts on forestry sector and a ban on BC wood products into US]
"Are they going to respond to that with culture wars? [Are] they going to respond to that with trying to divide their communities?... Or are they going to respond to that by partnering with the BC govt, with the federal govt, moving forward?"
----------------------------------------------
Are you with us or against us?!!
The premier is so far out of his lane on this one, he is headed high-speed for a cliff.
Because that sounds like he's trying to pressure local govt candidates to tow his party's line, while simultaneously whistling to supporters to vote for those municipal contenders who do.
Which appears to be an attempt to influence the results of the local govt election in the NDP's favour, and drag municipal candidates into provincial campaign messaging. All of which would muddy the already murky waters of having simultaneous elections.
Another term for that is 'election interference.'
Like, what is going on here?!!