The only true Fundamentalist account (the previous one was hacked) MSc in Economics and Finance $NBIS, $IREN, $NVDA, $OSCR, $HIMS, $BMNR Bull

Czechia
$NBIS Constructive criticism? FINALLY! I am always happy to have a constructive debate about some "bear" points regarding Nebius because it is refreshing to talk to someone capable of producing more than the "compute is not a moat" argument For point 1), there is a simple answer to the question: "If software earns more, why give scarce GPUS to bare-metal customers?" Because maximum revenue per GPU-hour is not the same as maximum risk-adjusted ROIC. A large $1B+ contract with a large upfront payment can fund the infrastructure that subsequently supports higher-margin workloads. Another thing is that if Nebius is getting $20M-$25M/MW for a bare-metal deal, it would be stupid not to take it. I also believe that the last-mentioned US-based quantitative trading firm is definitely more than just a bare-metal deal. Also, the other US-based AI neolab might use some of Nebius’ software or at least let Nebius deal with the management of the GPU clusters, making it a "Managed AI Infrastructure" not a bare-metal compute. Nevertheless, I agree that this needs to be monitored as the buildout matures. 2) Software moat? Software itself was never the moat as Kubernetes, serverless endpoints, GPU orchestration, inference APIs, managed clusters and all these things can be definitely replicated. I agree that Nebius reaching the Platinum ClusterMAX together with CoreWeave proves that. However, there is a big difference between software being commoditized and production economics being commoditized. Just look at Amazon, Azure, and Google, who all sell basically the same thing. But they aren’t economically identical, right? When talking about AI inference specifically, you compete across several verticals: cost/token x latency x reliability x utilization x model performance (definitely a few others, but these are the most important ones) People think that everyone will catch up, and they will. However, the result of this final equation will be different for everyone, as it is very difficult to optimize this 100%. Look at Nebius collecting the best teams across the industry, starting with Eigen AI all the way to Clarifai. The MOAT was never: "We have a serverless inference button, and Bitdeer or CoreWeave don’t." The MOAT was always: "For this model at this latency/SLA, Nebius can provide 1 million tokens materially cheaper than competitors while maintaining utilization and reliability." If you ever optimized model (I haven’t, but talked to several developers), every little percentage across the whole process compounds significantly, and there is a lot of stuff to optimize: serving engine, batching, KV-cache management, scheduler, networking, storage, GPU utilization, physical infrastructure, etc. I am not a developer, so anyone can feel free to correct me here or add anything, but this whole equation is like solving an impossible math problem, or rather tuning an econometric model for showing causality - to do it perfectly is basically impossible in the physical world is my point. To be fair, I agree that Nebius needs to prove that, in the long term, they are able to optimize the equation the best across the whole sector. It might happen, that for several years, we will get Nebius and CoreWeave in platinum tier and others will still be playing catch-up as these two companies have definitely by far the most appropriate talent in the industry. 3) Nvidia standardization I probably agree the most out of all 3 points on this one, as it definitely has a lot of truth inside it. You are essentially running everything on GPUs that Nvidia produces and their design is not your decision. But again, we are simplifying way too much by saying: "Therefore, a GB300 rack on Nebius is basically the same as a GB300 rack on CoreWeave." I don’t want to repeat myself because people will get bored of my long explanation, but once you connect all those racks, differentiation again moves back to the formula I wrote above. Trust me when I say that when you compare two compute/cloud providers and look at their MFU, utilization, downtime, training efficiency, tokens per GPU, or, for example, recovery time, you will get a different numbers, which in the end result in different ROIC/MW. It is like if you said that Ryanair and Wizz get the same value out of buying a Boeing aircraft. It is when it arrives at the customer, but the way you operate it can differ significantly. Nebius actually made it easy for us to see if they have any kind of expertise/MOAT. We should observe how the asset-light model works for Nebius. Because if it succeeds, it would arguably be the best evidence that Nebius itself has economic value and not only the ownership of scarce GPUs. But great criticism and some interesting points were raised, thanks for that!
Criticisms on $NBIS : One of my main points in my bull thesis was that NBIS would move away from the commoditized GPU/hour dynamic and build products/move up the stack for higher margin workloads. And controlling the inference/agentic stack would become a moat. But right now I dont see that happening with Nebius. Because: 1) they are themselves heavily leaning on bare-metal deals 2)the software stack is already commoditizing pretty fast, not a long-term moat 3)NVIDIA's platform strategy structurally limits neoclouds' own customization/moat 1st) Bare-metal deals: We all know the Meta/Microsoft deals were for fundraising and not the long term goal. But the famous 4 deals signed last quarter were all bare-metal. Reflection, Cohere, the anon neolabs all have their own software and dont need to pay for Nebius'. The core part of Nebius' bull thesis is that "bare-metal pays well, but with the SaaS layer on top it pays much better". So why hand out scarce capacity for bare metal deals? If the management is talking about its software pricing power and how it can command higher pricing power in every investor conference, why still do bare-metal deals? 2nd) The inference-as-a-service sector is already commoditizing pretty fast and the competition is brutal. New players like $DOCN, $BTDR (yes even an ex-btc miner, 2nd image) are entering the market which is already cutthroat with PaaS companies like TogetherAI and Fireworks. In fact, Nebius introduced serverless inference on March, and right now even Bitdeer has its own serverless inference service. Last week, great news dropped about $NBIS reaching platinum-level on SemiAnalysis ClusterMAX. Which is amazing but how can someone argue "software is a moat" when ironically Nebius itself disproves that point by challenging Coreweave's SaaS capabilities. That tells you that no one is safe by just having "better software" and the gap can be closed. There's been a lot of talk about Nebius' upcoming agent-as-a-service product (which I did a write-up on in May) but it still hasn't been shipped yet. A successful launch here might show that Nebius can outrun commoditization by moving up layers quickly. But it would turn into a "escape the lava" type "climb upward to survive" game which is not a sustainable model at all. 3rd) NVIDIA designs their products so no individual neo gets too powerful: As all investors know, $NBIS designs and builds their own server racks for HGX GPUs. This helps save on margins and become better vertically integrated. On Hopper and Blackwells (HGXs) this worked pretty well. However as compute scales up and out, there is more demand for rack-scale solutions. And NVIDIA pushes neoclouds to buy prebuilt racks from OEMs like DELL, ASUS, Wiwynn etc. This eliminates Nebius' advantage of building own racks. Because NVIDIA pushes the NVL72 architecture on every neocloud, the rack is no longer a Nebius one, its always Nvidia's. This consequently makes compute the same everywhere, a commodity. If no neocloud can differentiate meaningfully, a GB300 rack is substantially the same whether you buy from Coreweave, Nebius, Nscale, Lambda etc. On the 4th image you can see a pretty generic tweet about NVIDIA's connectivity solution being adopted by Nebius. This is a small example but shows how NVIDIA likes to standardize everything, limiting Nebius' ability to differentiate. These were the parts that damaged by original bull thesis quoted below. I still think Nebius is the best neocloud but im not convinced how they will differentiate from other meaningfully and build a long-term platform moat.
27
$NBIS As I said in my thesis, the broader consensus is still that AI is a bubble and 99/100 people have no idea what Nebius actually does We are so early!
$NBIS is down about 13% over the last 3 months. The good news that has come out in those 3 months makes your head spin. Eventually price catches up with news.
1
42
4,227
$NVDA While I see this as extremely bullish for Nvidia, the problem might be less supply for domestic companies such as neoclouds $NBIS $CRWV $IREN However the preferred ones as those listed above should be getting the Vera Rubins and GB300s, which I assume won’t be allowed to be shipped to China But something to keep an eye on!
JUST IN: China considers permitting ByteDance and Alibaba to buy new Nvidia chips
4
1,815
$NBIS I really really suggest reading this if you are either invested or thinking about investing into Nebius. Just 5000 words to become much more oriented in what Nebius actually offers and where I believe the edge still is for this company Share and follow for more! I did research on quite a few companies already, but now with Nebius there was so much stuff that I was extremely focused on this company Anyone knows some interesting stock that I should research and publish my thoughts? The most popular one will be on my radar next… Drop your tickers!!
5
17
264
82,278
$NVDA Elevated growth levels at least through 2030 The most bullish headline of the weekend: 100%
Wedbush: Nvidia's IR sees elevated growth levels at least through 2030. $NVDA
1
14
1,546
$NBIS Should you buy the stock? Whether it is a thesis article or a valuation model, I always get asked whether Nebius is a buy or not at these levels ($238 currently) Whether a stock is a buy is not a binary thing, it depends on many factors such as: - Your time horizon - Do you have a position already? - Are you able to withstand a 50% drawdown? - Do you understand the company? I always say that Nebius, for me, is a long-term position (unless something unexpected happens), and I intend to hold this stock for at least 3 years for sure. I understand the company a lot, and I can do the math around the profitability and revenue expectations, which helps me to add during drawdowns and hold during boring periods. If we are talking more than weeks/months, I can definitely recommend buying at these levels even if it might not be the best entry ever. It is a very individual thing, and everyone invests differently, but my prediction for 2027 is that the stock will reach $500 (my PT is even higher) and that would give you a 110% return over 15 months. The issue with buying based on my recommendation is pretty simple: - When something happens, you are not able to evaluate the consequences for the company/stock, and you might panic sell. - When nothing happens and the stock goes down, you have no idea what is happening, and you don’t have the conviction. Instead of adding to your position, you either hold or, in worse cases, even sell. Nebius is a top-quality company, but the stock is extremely volatile. I wouldn’t suggest buying just because other X creators or I tell you the company is great or that the stock is undervalued. Use our research and time as an inspiration for you to learn more about the company/stock, and only when you truly believe it is a good buy BASED ON YOUR OWN RESEARCH, buy the stock. Just some weekend thoughts before we open tomorrow
1
58
5,639
$NBIS BofA Analysis Yesterday I wrote my updated thesis on Nebius and at the end I talked about the AI consensus not being reached at all Another example here BofA forecasting FY2028 revenue to be $27B While BNP Paribas forecasts $22B in ARR by EOY27 and Wells Fargo expects 2GW of active power by EOY27 How do these analysts come up with these numbers is just beyond my understanding Imagine Nebius has 2GW of active power (average throughout the year) for FY2028 and they do $28B in revenue BofA is basically telling you that the blended revenue for 2028 will be $14M/MW If that was the case, I would expect their price target to be around $100, not $310 because the business model is not working with Vera Rubins being the next in line for 2027 and 2028 Get out of here with these estimates Thank you!
Nice $NBIS note from BofA
5
40
5,719
$NBIS $IREN I will say just one thing to this beatiful prediction by PwC Doing any prediction related to AI further than 2030 is absolute nonsense. It is difficult to predict 1-2 years ahead. ChatGPT was released roughly 4 years ago and the progress surprised everyone Who thought 4 years ago that: - We will be building this many GWs of data centers - We will use CPUs almost as much as GPUs - Photonics solutions will be used - We will talk about national security Almost nobody and given the progress is actually following an exponential trajectory, we will be absolutely shocked again and again and again in following years
$31.6 TRILLION. That’s PwC’s estimate for global data-centre capex through 2050. $IREN $CIFR $NBIS or $WULF, some might 5-10X and some 20X or more And PwC says POWER will be the decisive factor in where that capital flows. And the wild part? It doesn’t peak. Annual spending is projected to rise from $800B in 2026 to $1.8T/year by 2050. AI infrastructure isn’t a one-time buildout. It’s a multi-decade capex cycle. ⚡️
1
16
2,789
$NBIS $CRWV $IREN GPU lifecycle in Nscale’s S-1 Nscale estimates a useful lifecycle of 5-6 years for their GPUs $NBIS increased it to 5 years at the beginning of the year (was 4 before) $IREN assumes 5 years for long-term contracts as well $CRWV assumes 6 years based on the cascading use (first you train heavily, then inference, then less difficult processing) Seems like we have a consensus of 5-6 years across the industry Who knows it better? People who work with the GPUs or the bears that talk from their chair at home?
7
56
3,922
$NBIS $1.3T/year on data center and AI investment Not bad, given Nebius will capture like 10% of the market in 2032
Total data center & AI investment is projected to reach $10.3 trillion from 2025 to 2032 ⚡️ $IREN $CLSK $CIFR $WULF $HUT $NBIS $CRWV $SLNH $BTDR $WYFI
1
1
27
2,835
$NBIS Brother, what the fuck :D Nah, seriously, I know Nebius as a company a lot, but this guy always knows a bit more for some reason
Most of you know me as the buff Arkady who knows $NBIS better than most people know their own family. Well… meet the version with glasses: @nebulizerlabs. Yesterday I took the first step and launched my Substack. The goal is simple: go deeper 😏 Genuinely, thank y'all for your parasocial support. For cheering on my obsessions and autistic deep dives. You've helped me rediscover how much I love writing, researching, and teaching myself new things. In particular, I want to thank these individuals for sharing my work and encouraging me to keep putting myself out there. @babyfolio @TheBigBerbowski @AndersInvests @EndicottInvests @FrancisCashFlow @RayT168 @mvcinvesting @geokoutalidis @reelyphishy Nothing on X is going behind a wall! Substack just has better UI/UX scaffolding for longer form content. Expect plenty of free research. I hope it becomes a place for those who want to understand, not just trade the headlines. With that being said: Part 1 of Nebulizer’s Guide to Nebius is live ⚡️ My most in-depth $NBIS writeup yet. Completely free. ദ്ദി(˵ •̀ ᴗ - ˵ ) ✧ Time to grow some fresh cortical folds. smasimho.substack.com/
2
49
12,651
$NBIS Yes, an important detail to remember: $12B already contracted for a given price with $META The remaining $15B can be contracted with $META as well, but they would have to pay the price that Nebius would get elsewhere Translation: Nebius will use this $15B worth of compute elsewhere
$NBIS: Although this is well known within the Nebius community, I still see many considering and modeling the Meta deal as standard hyperscaler backlog. Once again, the biggest portion is a backstop, exposed to rising prices and well above what you'd see in bare metal deals.
2
1
41
4,429
$NBIS Investment Thesis (~5000 words) I think you will need a few minutes to read this one, but I wanted to have a complete thesis that I won’t have to update for at least a few months. There are both the points from my original thesis and the new ones, such as pricing power or an asset-light model, are discussed. Looking forward to your feedback, and enjoy!
8
6
130
20,368
$NBIS Wells Fargo seems a bit too bullish on that capacity, in my opinion. My base case assumes 1700MW of active power by EOY27 But even with that, you would get around $13M/MW, which is completely nonsense We will get to around $20M/MW, which means anything below $30B in exit ARR in 2027 would surprise me
BNP Paribas is forecasting $NBIS Q4'27 ARR @ $22bn Wells Fargo is forecasting 2GW of active capacity by EOY '27. Implies a blended rate of $11MM/MW/YR. This is a hyperconservative estimate even relative to where existing bare metal contracts are at. $22bn is FAR TOO LOW! 🆙
5
2
38
8,546
$NBIS Investment thesis tomorrow! Apparently, not only did my old followers start following me on this new account, but also many new ones who didn’t have the opportunity to read my Nebius investment thesis. Since it was written back in July and the AI space is a very dynamic place, I will write a new, updated article about it tomorrow!
3
67
2,975
$NBIS GTB Berlin sale For anyone going to GTC in Berlin, Nebius offers 20% off
Heading to GTC Berlin? Take 20% off your pass with code ref-spo-265118. See you on the show floor. Visit us at Booth 3013. Get it here: nebius.com/events/nvidia-gtc…
1
15
2,015
$NBIS Recycling more of my content from my previous account I found this explanation of Token Factory, which was one of my first longer posts about Nebius, and I think that even after a few months, it still provides valuable insight into what Token Factory represents and why you should understand what it means for Nebius’ business
$NBIS Token Factory explained in 15 minutes So I decided to write a little explanation of what the main differentiator of $NBIS is, and that is the "Token Factory" they introduced in November last year I will try to simplify this so that every investor can understand it. If you are interested in more technical details, ask me in the comments, and I might be able to explain it. So if someone asked me how I would explain it in one sentence, I would say that Token Factory is an AI platform designed to simplify the deployment, management, and scaling of large language models (LLMs) and other generative AI systems. It is a production-grade inference platform that allows organizations (and it is especially helpful for smaller businesses) to use AI models without the complexity of managing the underlying infrastructure. Token Factory is built around inference - the process where you generate outputs from already trained models (for example, asking questions and getting answers from models like ChatGPT). Whenever you ask ChatGPT a question, request code generation, or any other task you have ever done, the model produces a sequence of tokens that are, at the end, transformed into text/document that you can read. In the earliest stages of AI, we just had models like ChatGPT 3, Claude 3, etc. You paid your subscription of $20, and you were able to prompt infinitely, but lately the scale of these prompts has increased heavily, and enterprise adoption of these models has led OpenAI, Anthropic, and others to shift from simple subscription pricing to price/token, meaning that each prompt and each task is priced differently. The cost of the token is increasing rapidly, with supply not being able to meet demand. This is why $NBIS came with Token Factory, which is basically an optimizer for generating these tokens as efficiently, reliably, and cost-effectively as possible. The name kind of explains itself there. Traditionally, companies that wanted to deploy large AI models had to acquire and manage expensive GPU hardware, configure inference servers, monitor performance, handle traffic spikes, and continuously try to optimize their deployments. This process required companies to have experts in mainly these two fields: 1) Cloud infrastructure 2) Machine learning operations (MLOps) It is quite difficult to obtain a skillful team in these areas, so Nebius decided to go and remove majority of this complexity by providing a managed service that handles not only infrastructure, but also scaling, monitoring, and deployment via Token Factory. Developers can now simply connect to the platform through an API and immediately begin using advanced AI models. So the key strength is the exposure for smaller enterprises to open-source foundation models without acquiring a whole team of experts. Organizations can access and deploy models from families such as Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek, and from the latest announcement also NVIDIA Nemotron. The platform has interfaces that are compatible with widely used AI APIs, making migration and intergration relatively straightforward for development teams. What I did not understand initially, was that Token Factory goes beyond basic inference, it supports the whole lifecycle of AI applications. Users can tune their models on proprietary data to create domain-specific assistants for many industries like finance, healthcare, law and many others. This opens new possibilities like "parameter-efficient fine-tuning", "post-training optimization" that enable companies to customize models without the cost of training it from scratch. There are other fancy applications like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), where you combine LLMs with external knowledge sources like documents. But I don’t want to bore you to death as I understand majority of investors reading this are not machine learnings experts, so let’s skip this technical part. However, one last major advantage that you should be able to understand about Token Factory is the ability to scale "automatically". When you create an application and demand starts increasing, you usually start running into high latency and capacity problems. Instead of you having to allocate new compute to your application, which takes time and it might cause some downtime for your servers which are costly, Token Factory platform dynamically allocates additional computing resources to maintain both low latency and high throughout. The important thing is that this works the opposite way as well. When demand decreases, resources are released, helping companies optimize costs. This elastic scaling allows Token Factory to attract both small pilot projects to large-scale production deployments serving thousands of users and more. Now that I finished this paragraph, I realize that I completely forgot about one more thing and that is what we call in business "Enterprise governance and security". Token Factory includes features such as role-based access control, team management, authentication integration, usage monitoring, centralized billing and many other things that help companies maintaining control over AI deployments while meeting operational and compliance requirements. To somehow summarize everything, think of Token Factory as the "AWS of AI" or more precisely "AWS of AI inference". Companies bring their applications, Nebius provides the infrastructure and models, and charges for the AI output generated. The more AI is used, the more valuable Token Factory becomes. It is really that simple. I spent more time than I initially wanted on researching Token Factory and its use cases, but it really helped me to understand that this is something that gives $NBIS an unfair advantage against others in the sector. You should really understand this part of their business if you are an investor, so I will gladly answer your questions. If you found this a valuable read, follow me for more. Thanks! (picture is from ChatGTP)
1
22
2,163
$NBIS Token Factory explained in 15 minutes So I decided to write a little explanation of what the main differentiator of $NBIS is, and that is the "Token Factory" they introduced in November last year I will try to simplify this so that every investor can understand it. If you are interested in more technical details, ask me in the comments, and I might be able to explain it. So if someone asked me how I would explain it in one sentence, I would say that Token Factory is an AI platform designed to simplify the deployment, management, and scaling of large language models (LLMs) and other generative AI systems. It is a production-grade inference platform that allows organizations (and it is especially helpful for smaller businesses) to use AI models without the complexity of managing the underlying infrastructure. Token Factory is built around inference - the process where you generate outputs from already trained models (for example, asking questions and getting answers from models like ChatGPT). Whenever you ask ChatGPT a question, request code generation, or any other task you have ever done, the model produces a sequence of tokens that are, at the end, transformed into text/document that you can read. In the earliest stages of AI, we just had models like ChatGPT 3, Claude 3, etc. You paid your subscription of $20, and you were able to prompt infinitely, but lately the scale of these prompts has increased heavily, and enterprise adoption of these models has led OpenAI, Anthropic, and others to shift from simple subscription pricing to price/token, meaning that each prompt and each task is priced differently. The cost of the token is increasing rapidly, with supply not being able to meet demand. This is why $NBIS came with Token Factory, which is basically an optimizer for generating these tokens as efficiently, reliably, and cost-effectively as possible. The name kind of explains itself there. Traditionally, companies that wanted to deploy large AI models had to acquire and manage expensive GPU hardware, configure inference servers, monitor performance, handle traffic spikes, and continuously try to optimize their deployments. This process required companies to have experts in mainly these two fields: 1) Cloud infrastructure 2) Machine learning operations (MLOps) It is quite difficult to obtain a skillful team in these areas, so Nebius decided to go and remove majority of this complexity by providing a managed service that handles not only infrastructure, but also scaling, monitoring, and deployment via Token Factory. Developers can now simply connect to the platform through an API and immediately begin using advanced AI models. So the key strength is the exposure for smaller enterprises to open-source foundation models without acquiring a whole team of experts. Organizations can access and deploy models from families such as Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek, and from the latest announcement also NVIDIA Nemotron. The platform has interfaces that are compatible with widely used AI APIs, making migration and intergration relatively straightforward for development teams. What I did not understand initially, was that Token Factory goes beyond basic inference, it supports the whole lifecycle of AI applications. Users can tune their models on proprietary data to create domain-specific assistants for many industries like finance, healthcare, law and many others. This opens new possibilities like "parameter-efficient fine-tuning", "post-training optimization" that enable companies to customize models without the cost of training it from scratch. There are other fancy applications like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), where you combine LLMs with external knowledge sources like documents. But I don’t want to bore you to death as I understand majority of investors reading this are not machine learnings experts, so let’s skip this technical part. However, one last major advantage that you should be able to understand about Token Factory is the ability to scale "automatically". When you create an application and demand starts increasing, you usually start running into high latency and capacity problems. Instead of you having to allocate new compute to your application, which takes time and it might cause some downtime for your servers which are costly, Token Factory platform dynamically allocates additional computing resources to maintain both low latency and high throughout. The important thing is that this works the opposite way as well. When demand decreases, resources are released, helping companies optimize costs. This elastic scaling allows Token Factory to attract both small pilot projects to large-scale production deployments serving thousands of users and more. Now that I finished this paragraph, I realize that I completely forgot about one more thing and that is what we call in business "Enterprise governance and security". Token Factory includes features such as role-based access control, team management, authentication integration, usage monitoring, centralized billing and many other things that help companies maintaining control over AI deployments while meeting operational and compliance requirements. To somehow summarize everything, think of Token Factory as the "AWS of AI" or more precisely "AWS of AI inference". Companies bring their applications, Nebius provides the infrastructure and models, and charges for the AI output generated. The more AI is used, the more valuable Token Factory becomes. It is really that simple. I spent more time than I initially wanted on researching Token Factory and its use cases, but it really helped me to understand that this is something that gives $NBIS an unfair advantage against others in the sector. You should really understand this part of their business if you are an investor, so I will gladly answer your questions. If you found this a valuable read, follow me for more. Thanks! (picture is from ChatGTP)
7
13
118
8,079