As our piece notes, the British state promptly engineered novel legal arguments — many disputed or not even published — to justify air strikes intended to kill ISIS adversaries in Syria. Zero accountability or transparency required.
But when SAS soldiers were on the ground, and made snap decision in extreme circumstances, the same decision-makers in Downing St and the Ministry of Defence adopted the opposite view in the most expansive way possible.
One SAS soldier told us he didn’t want immunity and acknowledged two successive directors of special forces said they would have made the referral to law enforcement.
But the notion their conduct merited a three year investigation, homes raided, phones seized — but that they were ***at the same time*** fit for deployment to the most sensitive operations imaginable against ISIS in Syria, in one case 48 hours after being questioned for murder on base in Britain — is the tension our piece examines.
EXCLUSIVE: Insight reveals SAS soldiers hunting Isis leaders in Syria were arrested for murder and had homes raided — only to be sent back behind enemy lines
Our report on Operation Tanglement ends years of secrecy to expose crisis in UK special forces
thetimes.com/uk/defence/arti…