We Have The Watch.

THEN: The Nazis euthanized 250,000 mentally ill people during WWII. NOW: Canada will vote October 7 on whether to euthanize mentally ill people. And they say we're Nazis.

And this is exactly the problem:

Clavicular tells his chat to commit assault and battery against women while they’re sleeping by putting nicotine patches on them without their consent. @clavicular Ladies, get out of his home, call the police, and press charges. Put these animals in jail where they belong.

COMMENT on Bupe: Buprenorphine was introduced in the 1970's and failed miserably in pain RCT's. It's no better now - it certainly didn't "improve" after 50yrs on the shelf - the push to force pain pts off full agonist opioids and onto Bupe and Subs is politically and profit driven.

Judging who’s really in physical pain in 2026 America apparently goes like this: “Cool story. Now prove it with the correct facial expression.” “Rate your pain from 0–10.” Say 10, and somebody thinks you’re exaggerating. Say 6, and apparently you’re doing well enough to suffer quietly. Say 8 while calmly speaking, and suddenly your facial expression has entered the peer-review process. Cry? “Emotional.” Don’t cry? “Doesn’t appear distressed.” Use humor? “Seems comfortable.” Stop using humor? “Flat affect.” Meanwhile, the patient is sitting there thinking: Would anybody like to know whether I can shower, sleep, cook dinner, drive, work, walk through a grocery store, or exist in my own body without negotiating with it every fifteen minutes? Pain was never meant to be a personality test. And a human nervous system was never going to fit neatly inside ten little numbers. Maybe instead of asking only, “How bad does it hurt?” we should also be asking: “What is this pain preventing you from doing with your life?” Because sometimes the most important number in pain management isn’t 0–10. It’s how much of someone’s life they’re still able to keep. Just some food for thought for the anti-opioid knuckleheads out there.

IMO evidence is out there of “outside party” it just needs to be discovered and brought forward It seems a miracle that she survived at all There must be a profound reason

PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS HAVE BECOME PUBLIC ENEMY #1, CAUSING HARM AND DEATH TO PATIENTS IN PAIN! wabcradio.com/episode/claudi…

New evidence shows a Fauci aide BRAGGED about destroying “tons” of emails and more secret gain-of-function work. One message read “Hey, Dr. Fauci, I was able to destroy tons of your emails this weekend.” This is illegal and damning. Rand Paul has been attempting to offer her immunity for more information. We now have more than enough proof that Fauci committed crimes and attempted to cover them up. He needs to be prosecuted over this.

The Bible told us where Noah's Ark landed. 4,000 years later, they're drilling right there. Genesis 8:4: "The ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat." This week, scientists started drilling into a 515-foot, boat-shaped formation in the mountains of Ararat in eastern Turkey. Radar scans show angular walls, a central corridor, and three levels underground. Genesis 6:16 says the ark had three decks. The right place. The right shape. The right size. The right number of decks. Skeptics said the Hittites never existed, until their capital was dug up. They said Pontius Pilate was a legend, until his name turned up carved in stone. They said King David was a myth, until an ancient inscription named "the house of David." Every time, the ground ends up agreeing with the Bible. The Ark was real. The Flood was real. God's Word was always true.

If you don’t believe that women are even fully humans….

Keith Raniere, who’s partners the Brofman sisters, of Seagram’s fame…. Who’s brother E Brofman jr is business partners with Roy Danis, Rachel’s dad?

Can I have pain medicine? No Can you find someone to kill me? Ill look into it! TOTALLY NOT COERCISON

“Those of us with #ChronicPain wake up every day with pain. This automatically causes a problem with the standard pain scale… Some of us never have a zero… People who don’t have chronic pain often have a hard time understanding that.” buff.ly/DV4J65r #PainAwarenessMonth

I just saw this posted in the comments of a video by Katherine Here on Facebook. This is such a good explanation of all the many afflictions during #Akathisia . I don't know who created this image to credit them, if you know, please tag them in the comments.

My email 🧵today to the NIH regarding the grant program for research into health disparities, asking if any of these funds are being used to find out what we have been asking about patient harms and deaths caused by the de-prescribing agenda: "I am writing to inquire about whether this effort to address health disparities will be doing any research about the effects of the public health initiative involving the opioid de-prescribing, agenda and the numbers of harms and deaths being caused to patients by this agenda. And, the fact that FLASE CLAIMS about "prescription opioid medications" are driving these policies even though the government's own data clearly shows that: 1. Prescription opioid medications were NOT a causal factor in the parabolic rise in deaths from illicit fentanyl analog compound poisonings that began in about 2010; 2. While the "opioid crisis* was framed by the litigation narrative as having been caused by "over-prescribing," the actual fact of the matter is that pain medications prescribed to patients did not cause the crisis, but rather MISUSE, ABUSE, and DIVERSION caused the problems, not "overprescribing." Multiple researchers have poured through the data to reach this truth and have written about it extensively in the medical literature 3. It is statistically IMPOSSIBLE to claim that the effort to reduce prescribing has in any way contributing to the reduction in the numbers of deaths caused by illicitly obtained drugs because the number of patients prescribed pain medications who go on to develop opioid use disorder has been shown by FDA mandated studies to be 1.4%, and an even smaller number of those patients ever die from their medications, which almost always involves polypharmacy and/or alcohol misuse/abuse and is NOT specifically due to the pain medication. So, the idea that reducing prescribing to all of the pain patients (when this tiny number of patients prescribed opioids and who develop OUD) is helping, reduce deaths is not statistically possible, and cannot possibly represent any significant number of prevented deaths attributable to the de-prescribing agenda because those were not the people dying en masse in the first place. This crisis has been driven by the availability of illicit drugs from the beginning, and any claim otherwise is absolutely fraudulent." (Con't)......

Mogs OF women on podcasts but can't handle pushback on X. Weak.

Warning - long post incoming. I put this together because of two specific reasons - I had two people threaten me with lawsuits if I didn't take their records down from the TAS site. Me being me, I took them down and promptly started investigating. What I discovered caused more questions than answers. So I went digging more into the territory of "how could this have happened". What you see below is a result of me seeking answers to those questions. Federal law stops one thing: helping a person get the next school job. It does not stop a hush agreement (NDA), and it does not stop a resignation or a certificate surrender from ending the case. States that are actually trying to prevent “pass the trash” wrote their own rules. They did not write the same rule (see how Florida and Texas have made laws in totally different directions and somehow are still not comprehensive enough IMO). Federal law 20 U.S.C. § 7926, in force since December 10, 2015. If a state or district takes federal K-12 money, it must have a law, regulation, or policy that says an employee, contractor, or agent may not help a school employee get a new job, other than by sending ordinary personnel files, when they know or have probable cause of sexual misconduct with a minor or student. Personally speaking - it should be a law - period - "regulation" and "policy" are in so many cases inconsistently applied. That ban lifts if the matter was reported to law enforcement and the other authorities the law requires, and then one of three things is true: the case was closed or police said there was not enough probable cause; the person was charged and acquitted or exonerated; or the case stayed open and no charge was filed within four years of the report to police. The Secretary of Education is forbidden to require any particular method. A policy on paper meets the federal condition (but does not mean anyone will actually get booted from a school or face real consequences). Federal guidance Guidance is not a second statute or law. It does not void a nondisclosure agreement. It does not make a district finish an investigation after a resignation. It does not stop a state from accepting a certificate surrender. It does not create a do-not-hire list. It does not follow the person into every private school or across a state line. A state can comply with federal law and still allow both exits parents mean by “pass the trash.” A hush deal (Non disclosure agreement - NDA). The district agrees not to say why the person left. A walk-away. The person resigns, or turns in their teaching certificate, before anyone makes a finding. The next school sees a clean file (this happened a TON and still happens in many states today). States that restrict a hush agreement The agreement itself is void, banned, or tied to a penalty. The limit is often narrower than every secret deal. Florida, 2018. A confidentiality clause that hides misconduct affecting a student’s health or safety is void. Since 2021 the person must sign a sworn reason for leaving, and the next district must read it. This is district law, not a rule for every private school. Pennsylvania, December 21, 2014. The applicant discloses investigations, resignations while allegations were pending, and license actions, unless the allegations were found false. A suppression agreement is void. Public, charter, and private schools. A willful violation can draw a civil penalty of up to $10,000. Connecticut, July 1, 2016. Same shape. Extended to nonpublic-school supervisors in 2017. Unsubstantiated cases are carved out. New Jersey, June 1, 2018. Twenty years of child-contact jobs, plus disclosure of investigations, resignations, and license surrender. A suppression agreement is void. Districts, charters, nonpublic schools, and contractors (as a prior dig into New Jersey found out - then penalty here for lying on these forms is $500 - PENALTY - as in not a crime like it is to lie on a federal form). Maryland, July 1, 2019. County boards, nonpublic schools, and contractors. An agreement that hides a child-sexual-abuse or sexual-misconduct investigation, signed on or after that date, is void. Washington, September 1, 2004. Districts must ask current and past employers, including out of state. An agreement that suppresses sexual misconduct is void. “Sexual misconduct” here means the district determined it happened and the employee left because of it. Idaho, September 1, 2011. Public-school employers must request conduct records, including from out of state. An agreement that suppresses unethical conduct is void. Unsubstantiated cases can still be removed from the file. Oregon, July 1, 2010. Districts, charters, and private schools. A clause that suppresses a substantiated report of abuse or sexual conduct is void. The same set of laws bars helping the person get the next job. Vermont. A confidential separation agreement that hides conduct jeopardizing a minor is void if signed on or after June 3, 2010. In 2018, districts and recognized independent schools were required to give the next employer a factually correct employment record. Illinois, July 1, 2023. Public and nonpublic elementary and secondary schools may not sign an agreement that suppresses a pending sexual-misconduct investigation, or a finished one in which the allegation was substantiated. Tennessee, July 1, 2018. A district may not use a nondisclosure agreement to settle sexual misconduct, including sexual harassment or sexual assault. The same law bars helping the person get the next job. Michigan, May 8, 1996. Districts, charters, and nonpublic schools may not suppress “unprofessional conduct,” which is broader than sex cases. The required call is the current employer, or the last one if the applicant is unemployed. Iowa, July 1, 2023. Districts, accredited nonpublic schools, and charters may not gag discussion of past allegations, discipline, or a resignation with a government agency or the next employer. Kentucky, April 10, 2026. Public districts and charters may not sign a nondisclosure agreement about misconduct involving a minor or student. Nebraska, July 18, 2026. Hiring duties start in the 2027–28 school year. Districts and approved private schools may not sign a resignation deal that suppresses a child-abuse or sexual-misconduct investigation. Indiana, July 1, 2023. A school may not hire someone whose settlement of a student-safety allegation included a nondisclosure agreement, unless the board approves that hire as its own agenda item. Nevada, July 1, 2017. The secrecy ban applies when the person was convicted of a sexual offense involving a minor. An agreement about an uncharged allegation can still exist. California, January 1, 2026. Schools may not agree to block a mandatory report of egregious misconduct, and they may not expunge a credible complaint or a substantiated investigation. The statewide data system is not operating. It is aimed at July 1, 2027, and only if the legislature appropriates the money (given it's California - how much do you want to bet this somehow misses getting budgeted?). Colorado, 2021. A district or charter may not settle a case in a way that blocks sharing a conviction for child abuse or a sex offense against a child. New Mexico, 2021. An agreement that weakens the duty to keep investigating after the person leaves is void. The compiled section number was not confirmed on the code site. New York, 2000. An agreement to hide a child-abuse allegation from police, in exchange for a resignation, is a class E felony and a civil penalty of up to $20,000. That is a ban on burying the report. It is not a general nondisclosure ban, and it does not require a work-history check. Missouri, current text 2019, originally 2011. If a district lets someone who has contact with children resign instead of being fired, and then omits sexual-misconduct allegations from a reference, the district can be liable to a later student. The contract is not declared void. The consequence is damages. Arkansas, 2023. Probable cause of sexual misconduct with a minor means the superintendent may not give a favorable recommendation. The separation agreement can still exist. Texas is absent from this group. The 2025 Texas law does not void a hush agreement. States that stop a resignation or surrender from ending the case Texas, June 20, 2025. During an investigation of abuse, a sexual or romantic relationship, inappropriate communications, or a boundary violation, the state may not accept a certificate surrender unless the person agrees to the Do Not Hire registry. The district must finish that investigation even if the person resigns. That finish-the-investigation duty dates to 2017. Drugs, theft, and a fraudulent certificate sit outside the surrender rule. Private schools are outside the discharge duty. A surrender from 2018 predates this statute and the registry (it was a surrender from years earlier that prompted me digging into this). Hawaii, 2024. The school must finish the investigation after a resignation. A harm-to-students registry exists. It is not a public list (I'd argue that this list should be public - otherwise how are parents supposed to know?). Public and private schools are covered. Listing requires a finding and a chance to appeal. Maine, April 15, 2026. The school must finish a covered investigation even if the person resigns. The statute PDF still online shows the older text. The 2026 session law controls. Maine still allows a separation agreement. Iowa. The licensing board must finish a complaint even if the person resigns or turns in the credential. Arizona. A district may not accept the resignation until a suspicion of reportable conduct involving a minor has been reported to the state board. A 2025 amendment lets the next school request that file. The file stays confidential. Arizona has no hush-agreement ban. Florida, the second tool. Separate from the voided agreement: a district may not put the person in a student-contact job after a termination, or a resignation in lieu of termination, for sexual misconduct with a student, and must report them for the state disqualification list. North Carolina, only in part. Teachers who earned career status before August 1, 2013 can be treated as having surrendered the license for up to 45 days if they resign during a dismissal case. A 2023 law makes failure to report specified misconduct by a licensed employee a felony. That misconduct is automatic-revocation crimes or a non-accidental physical injury, not the broader sexual-misconduct hiring rules other states use. States that mostly copied the federal sentence These laws say do not help the person get the next job. A hush agreement and a quiet resignation can still stand, unless the state is also listed in a group above. Virginia, 2018. Public school boards must adopt the federal policy. Accredited private schools are in a later subsection. Unaccredited private schools are outside it (I've seen this in many states, why not "all schools"?). A 2024 law sets a 10-day deadline for one board to answer another. The answer does not have to include sexual misconduct. West Virginia. Public and private school employees are covered. The exceptions match the federal rule, including four years with no charge. The year is not printed on the code page. The session citation is 2017. Wisconsin, December 10, 2017. School boards, private-school governing bodies, and charter operators. Helping the person get the next job is “immoral conduct” for licensing purposes, unless police closed the case without a conviction. Montana, 2019. Public and nonpublic schools. A knowing violation is a misdemeanor: a fine up to $1,000, up to a year in jail, or both. North Dakota, signed April 11, 2019. The ban also applies while an investigation is underway. A violation is a class B misdemeanor. The open-case exception is one year with no charges, shorter than the federal four years. Ohio, September 30, 2021. The job-help ban covers districts, chartered nonpublic schools, and certain county-board education jobs. Since 2008, a resignation or retirement during an investigation into conduct unbecoming must be reported to the state superintendent. That report is not a public do-not-hire list. Oklahoma. A state-board rule copies the federal job-help ban for districts and charters. A resignation during an investigation that could cost the certificate must be reported to the State Board. The file is not an open record. A hiring district may request it. Delaware, 2023–24 school year. Districts and charters must adopt a policy that substantiated adult sexual misconduct is reported in later reference checks. The statute does not void the agreement. District of Columbia, April 11, 2019. The job-help ban covers public, charter, private, and parochial schools, with the federal four-year exception. DCPS and charters must also check former employers for the longer of seven years or the last three jobs. Separation agreements are not voided. Oregon, Tennessee, and Nevada sit in this group and in the hush group. States with no dedicated hush law and no do-not-hire rule Federal § 7926 still applies where the district takes that federal money. The official codes show background checks or a license bar after a conviction. They do not show a voided school nondisclosure agreement, a required sexual-misconduct work history, or a rule that a resignation forces the case onto a do-not-hire list. Alabama. Criminal-history checks for school employees with unsupervised access to children, including nonpublic schools that request them. A revoked certificate ends the job. Alaska. Fingerprints for a teaching certificate. No certificate after listed crimes against a minor. “Immorality,” as a firing ground, means a crime of moral turpitude. Kansas. The state board may not license a person convicted of listed sex crimes. The bill that would ban hush agreements and create a registry is not law. Georgia. The education code has no job-help ban and no voided school nondisclosure agreement. The credentialing commission investigates if an applicant admits resigning over a felony, a crime of moral turpitude, or a certificate sanction. Sex with a student is a crime. A separate labor statute still treats a nondisclosure agreement as a reason the former employer may stay silent. Massachusetts. The bill is still in committee. Minnesota. A report to the licensing board is required within ten days when a teacher or administrator resigns during an investigation. That is a license report. Mississippi. No enacted hiring or hush statute in the personnel chapters or in bill titles from 2008 through 2026. New Hampshire. Criminal-history checks, and revocation of certification after a felony involving children. Rhode Island. Criminal-record checks and abuse-awareness classes. No employment-history or separation-agreement statute in the education-title section list. South Carolina. The full education title was searched. No matching statute. South Dakota. The education title, as published by the legislature, does not contain the hiring or secrecy phrases. Wyoming. No matching hiring statute in the education title. The nearby rule is a certification criminal-history check, and notice to the teaching-standards board if a certificate holder is dismissed or resigns because of a felony conviction. What still slips through A law in the first groups often stops at the public district. The next state does not have to honor it (this is key in many cases as teachers seem to have a habit of changing states and getting a job again in the same profession). “Unsubstantiated” and “false” are real exceptions. Texas can list someone as not eligible for hire, and Florida can bar them from student contact, while a district in the last group can still fail to hear either fact. A voluntary surrender is a closed hearing. It is not a decision that the state will skip the investigation. In the states that closed that exit, the investigation continues, or the surrender itself puts the person on a list. In the states that did not, a resignation and a quiet reference are still available. So when you look at all the laws across all the states you can see how in many cases one state can ban a teacher, and a new state can hire them despite any malfeasance on record in the first state. This is a problem that unfortunately needs a national law because it's clear many states will simply ignore what happened elsewhere in a great number of cases.

I was trafficked by John Casablancas Modeling Agency to Executives of L'Oreal and Helene Curtis when I was barely 18; I escaped & immediately left the agency. They kept my portfolio & said I had signed away my photos & likeness to them even though I was only 16 when I signed up.