Standing up to AI billionaire Trump donors trying to buy our elections and prevent common sense regulation

Guardrails Alliance retweeted
We're talking about Greg Brockman here, a core funder of @LeadingFutureAI -the super PAC opposing pro-AI regulation candidates. The Dems they just endorsed should be running to the mic to disavow them right now: @EmiliaSykesOH @RepHorsford @RepJoeMorelle @RepGregStanton
EXCLUSIVE: OpenAI’s president and his wife gave $25 million to Trump’s super PAC — and three months later, a federal rule requiring AI companies to disclose their most dangerous experiments was withdrawn.
1
5
18
1,135
Leading the Future has announced a new batch of Senate races they’re spending in. While states like Michigan, Ohio, and Maine will decide control of the Senate, Leading the Future has decided to spend in less competitive races because they know how toxic their money is.
5
6
527
These Democrats should all reject the endorsement of Leading the Future, whose support has become absolutely toxic with voters.
Exclusive: Pro-AI super PAC endorses first Dems in general election axios.com/2026/09/25/pro-ai-…
1
6
26
2,048
Some of the leading voices on AI regulation have come from progressives like @BernieSanders, @GregCasar, and @AOC. Now our partners at @WorkingFamilies are standing up to AI billionaires and putting AI regulation front and center in their work.
NEW: the @WorkingFamilies is re-orienting the group’s entire mission to put more focus on combatting AI and the big tech companies developing it. Sign of how AI is already reshaping politics — and of the opportunity the left sees in fighting it washingtonsun.com/technology…
6
20
1,495
Guardrails Alliance retweeted
Xi and Trump meet this week alongside top AI leaders. All week, you’ll hear that we can’t slow down because of the race with China. I wrote in Fortune today: this is a self-serving con. The real AI threat isn’t China, it’s accelerationism. Accelerationist-in-chief Marc Andreessen argues, “We believe any deceleration of AI will cost lives. Deaths that were preventable by the AI that was prevented from existing is a form of murder.” But “delay is murder” does not poll well, so China has become the bogeyman. Those who invoke China know the truth. Jensen Huang says China is “nanoseconds behind America.” Trump says, “Whoever wins AI, wins.” Yet both support selling Nvidia chips to China. Chinese firms have about 5% of the world’s AI compute. Meanwhile China has managed to innovate while maintaining the tightest controls over AI of any nation. On AI, China is not our enemy and we are not China's. Our common enemy is the race itself — accelerationism.
33
37
162
7,310
Few people understand the impacts of AI on job loss better than our spokesperson Chris @Hyams, the former CEO of Indeed. In a new op-ed he lays out why the “but China” argument is a distraction and how unregulated AI development poses an even greater threat to the U.S.
1
9
24
992
Guardrails Alliance retweeted
Fear is unfounded. Look at the facts. 1) When AI PACs spend, it *helps* the candidates they come in against. Leading the Future knows they're toxic, and that's why... 2) LTF has only been in one barely competitive race since about March. This is a fight Dems can pick and win.
Politico: Democratic advisers are warning their candidates not to go too hard at AI Democratic consultants are privately encouraging their battleground candidates to avoid talking about AI regulations out of fear that powerful tech groups will unleash a tidal wave of spending against them ahead of November. Link: politico.com/news/2026/09/17…
5
14
1,595
Shut it down.
Hey @openai, @GuardrailsNow is back again at your DC office this evening 👋👋👋 Enough posturing. Shut down Leading the Future PAC.
1
2
18
1,211
Guardrails Alliance retweeted
I literally can't imagine a better fight to pick right now than w/ AI Industry CEOs and their PACs. Talking 80% of people who disapprove. We have the resources to counter them b/c we also have PEOPLE
Democratic advisers are warning their candidates not to go too hard at AI dlvr.it/TVX4Fs
1
3
10
322
Cautionary Tale for Democratic leaders: Newsom now has to make up for veto'ing what would have been the nations strongest AI safety law. Be on the right side of history and your own constituents: put Guardrails around AI + enforce laws that protect our safety.
Big scoop from @ChaseDiFelice and @JeremyBWhite: Newsom says he wants to take further action on AI safety before leaving office, including raising the possibility of a special session subscriber.politicopro.com/a…
1
9
35
1,657
We’re excited for this important hearing and applaud @RepJayapal and the @MonopolyBusters for making it happen.
The majority of Americans see the rapid, unregulated advancement of AI as a serious risk. Congress has to act quickly. That's why tomorrow I'm hosting a timely hearing on Big Tech's monopolistic practices and the harm of surveillance AI. Watch live at 8:30 AM: piped.video/watch?v=KDMITKPA…
8
275
Dear @OpenAI, @sama, @chrislehane, There is no world in which you can allow @LeadingFutureAI to operate AND pretend to be "Pro-Regulation" on AI. Shut it down. Sincerely, Guardrails Alliance & the overwhelming majority of Americans
3
5
26
1,358
We encourage every Democrat to sign this pledge and demonstrate that they will not let a PAC funded by Trump-supporting Palantir and OpenAI executives control Congress.
BIG AI IS BUYING OFF POLITICIANS. We're doing something about it. As people demand action to stop Big AI from putting our lives in danger, execs from @OpenAI, @PalantirTech, and @a16z built a monster Super PAC to pay politicians to kill common-sense regulation. We’re calling on every politician to REJECT @LeadingTheFutureAI. 10 federal candidates are already with us. If you’re worried about AI and you’re looking to take action, you should know about Leading the Future. Read this 🧵 to learn more.
3
11
773
Guardrails Alliance issued a new demand to OpenAI: Shut down your super PAC, Leading The Future. Exec Dir @SLThomas: “If OpenAI is serious about managing the risks of the technology it’s building, it needs to push Leading the Future to wind down operations immediately.”
3
11
25
690
Leading the Future was seeded with $25 million from OpenAI President and co-founder Greg Brockman. Since its launch, LTF has raised more than $140 million, making it one of the largest single-issue super PACs this cycle.
1
1
105
.@SLThomas: “Every dollar Leading the Future spends trying to bury lawmakers is a dollar OpenAI could be spending on safety instead of silencing the people trying to hold it accountable.”
3
68
🚨NEW POLL🚨 Leading the Future endorsed Congressman Jimmy Gomez is currently trailing progressive challenger Angela Gonzales-Torres, 38%-41% When voters learn he's endorsed by a corporate AI super PAC funded by some of Trump's biggest donors her lead expands...by a lot
new - CA-34 poll has Angela Gonzales-Torres at 41% and Rep. Jimmy Gomez at 38%, within margin of error w/ @burgessev semafor.com/article/09/10/20…
2
15
35
4,096
Guardrails Alliance retweeted
Sen Cantwell is saying the important part out loud. Of course there should be urgency. But the regulatory response has to meet the moment and the Trump regime is singularly focused on enabling Big AI to do whatever it wants… don’t be seduced by any individual Republicans
Republicans are suddenly waking up to the urgent need for tough AI safety rules, a sharp reversal from last year when House Republicans and Chairman Cruz tried to impose a 10-year moratorium on state AI regulations that the tech bros wanted. I welcome the urgency. But the answer is not a weak federal standard that becomes a backdoor for wiping out stronger state protections. Meaningful legislation would require the most powerful AI models undergo testing by scientists and experts at our national laboratories to assess whether they could enable sophisticated cyberattacks or aid the development of biological or nuclear weapons.
3
12
927
It cannot be overstated how much the AI billionaires trying to stop any regulations on AI are just constantly lying to us
For two years @pmarca has been making up an obvious lie about a Biden WH meeting that led him to support Trump. I and others have repeatedly asked him to reveal who was in the meeting to try to verify his wild claims. Now the truth is out: politico.com/news/magazine/2…
4
56
2,187