🚨Demoree alleges that Desiree Perez asked Minerva Alvarez (Her grandmother) and a Babalawo named Pucci in New Jersey to perform religious ceremonies or “jobs” involving Jay Brown, Shawn Carter/Jay-Z, Nicki Minaj, Beyoncé Knowles, Alex Rodriguez, and others. ➡️ She claims text messages on Minerva’s iPhone would document those requests and says another person, Diego Hernandez, witnessed or assisted with them. #DesireePerez #Babalawo

🚨In Demoree Hadley’s sworn declaration she alleged the following: “I have never done “witchcraft”; I am spiritual, believe in God and the saints, and practice the Yoruba religion that Desiree and Minerva put me into as a young child. Desiree Perez and Minerva Alvarez often used my own spirituality and Yoruba beliefs against me to abuse and manipulate me, since they were my mentors in the religion. For example: Minerva would say you have to do this or else the saint will punish you. I was naïve and new to the religion and believed blindly what Minerva and Desiree told me when it came to the religion. Audios submitted in Ironkey will prove just that: Desiree would instruct people like Maria de los Angeles to send Demoree religious instructions of what she should and should not do, to trick me into doing what they wanted. Desiree Perez has asked Minerva Alavarez and a Babalawo named Pucci in New Jersey to conduct religious masses, ceremonies, and jobs against Jay Brown, Shawn Carter, Nicki Minaj, Beyonce Knowles, Alex Rodriguez, etc., when she herself believes in the religion and its practices. (Evidence in Minerva's iPhone of text exchanges of Desiree asking for this) Also, Diego Hernandez was present during these requests and assisted Minerva with the jobs. (Desiree is in possession of Minerva’s phone and I am sure messages are there).” Declaration: drive.google.com/file/d/1paq…

💬| @NICKIMINAJ replied with a laughing emoji to a Tiktok comment about her being everywhere but in the studio 😭😭

Ciara attends Vogue World ✨️

Ciara doing the matrix while pregnant! 🔥 #iHeartFestival2026

All hail the undisputed queen of rap 👑 @NICKIMINAJ

I hate how people talk about Nicki using filters as if these bitches don’t be getting their photos edited professionally and using IG filters on their stories…..? What is wrong with a light filter? Y’all be killing me about that. 😂😂😂😂

Nicki Minaj is the 2nd most viewed female artist on TikTok with over 175 BILLION views from videos using her songs, making her the most viewed female rapper on the platform.

#MillionDollarPitch @SBA_Kelly @SBAgov @LizHabib

Get me off old people internet NOW

Nicki Minaj joins the @IngrahamAngle for an exclusive interview about her work with Team Trump on a major new project. Watch the full interview tonight at 7 p.m. ET on Fox News.

Free Tory

⚖️COURT UPDATE⚖️ Milagro Cooper has filed her APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF in her Eleventh Circuit appeal against Megan Pete. Cooper, who is proceeding PRO SE, is asking the appellate court to reverse major portions of the $75,000 Amended Final Judgment. Her reply focuses on SIX main areas👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾 • Rule 60(b)(6) and the reinstated defamation verdict • Whether Cooper was “commissioned” by the Peterson family • Actual malice • Florida’s Anti-SLAPP statute • The altered sexual depiction claim under Fla. Stat. § 836.13 • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress On the DEFAMATION issue, Cooper argues that Rule 60(b)(6) should NOT have been used to override the jury’s finding that she should be treated as a media defendant. She argues that the jury heard the same evidence later relied upon by the District Court and nevertheless found in her favor on media status. According to Cooper, there was • No newly discovered evidence. • No intervening change in law. • No new evidence unavailable to the jury. Cooper also directly attacks Megan’s “COMMISSIONED SURROGATE” theory. She argues the evidence must be analyzed STATEMENT BY STATEMENT rather than treating her overall relationship with the Peterson family as proof that all three statements were commissioned. On Statement 1, Cooper argues that a one-way text from Daystar Peterson telling her to contact him does NOT establish that he directed the statement. On Statement 2, Cooper argues that the Akademiks interview had already been recorded and broadcast BEFORE a communication from Sonstar Peterson that Megan’s team relied upon. On Statement 3, Cooper argues there is an even larger gap because the August 2024 post concerned Emilio Garcia’s separate lawsuit and she says Megan identified NO communication, payment or instruction from the Peterson family connected to that post. Cooper also disputes the significance of approximately $3,000 in prior payments from Sonstar Peterson. She says those transfers occurred between 2020 and 2022 and were NOT payments for the three statements at issue. On ACTUAL MALICE, Cooper argues that Daystar Peterson’s criminal conviction does NOT automatically establish that every later criticism she made about Megan’s credibility was knowingly false. She says the appellate court must independently review whether she subjectively knew each challenged statement was false or recklessly disregarded its truth. On ANTI-SLAPP, Cooper acknowledges that she did NOT raise Florida’s statute in her original motion to dismiss or plead it as an affirmative defense. BUT she argues successor counsel later asked for additional time to evaluate and file dispositive motions, including anti-SLAPP, and that the Court denied that extension. She now asks the Eleventh Circuit to leave the anti-SLAPP issue available for consideration on REMAND if any speech-based claim is vacated. On the ALTERED SEXUAL DEPICTION claim, Cooper argues that Fla. Stat. § 836.13 requires more than simply directing viewers toward a video. She contends the statute also requires proof of a culpable mental state and argues that her contemporaneous statements questioning whether the video was AI and warning others not to repost it undermine a finding that she knowingly or maliciously promoted an altered depiction. And on INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, Cooper argues that Megan cannot simply combine years of commentary, the deepfake dispute, offensive remarks and her relationship with the Peterson family into one “campaign” and automatically satisfy Florida’s extremely high outrageousness standard. Cooper ultimately asks the Eleventh Circuit to👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾 • REVERSE the reinstated defamation verdict. • REVERSE the Fla. Stat. § 836.13 judgment for insufficient evidence. • REVERSE the IIED judgment for insufficient evidence. • Require the District Court to address Florida’s Anti-SLAPP statute on remand if any speech-based claim is vacated. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS? REPLY BREIF - drive.google.com/file/d/1gob…

Chris Brown is the first Roc Nation survivor

DRAKE AND DON TOLIVER CHOOSIN’ TEXAS REMIX

FULL: Akademiks reacts to Drake's 'FOMO' featuring his first song with Sexyy Red 👀

an icon was born

🚨 Tory’s habeas petition exhibits also gives some interesting context to Milagro Cooper (Milagro Gramz). These people were watching her commentary all the way back in December 2022, during Tory Lanez’s trial. A member of Megan’s team sent prosecutor Alex Bott a direct link to Milagro’s commentary, gave him the exact timestamp and said she had been “laughing for minutes.” Bott responded: “Hahaha” “She is very strange” So when Milagro appears again in their communications years later, understand this was not some person they suddenly discovered in 2024. They had been watching her since the trial. But most likely from 2020. And here is why those 2022 Milagro messages become more interesting. Fast forward to October 2024. Megan’s attorney asks prosecutors about claims concerning the missing gun and fragments. Kathy Ta responds that the bullet fragments were never found. Megan’s attorney then says: “Milagro back at it again” Minutes later the discussion turns to sanctions and wanting to pursue civil suits because they were “sick of the lies.” Then weeks later, the same group is discussing research concerning a potential civil restraining order and Kathy Ta is suggesting they compare civil harassment versus a civil DVRO (Domestic Violence Restraining Order). Whatever conclusion you draw from it, these exhibits show a level of ongoing communication between Megan’s civil lawyer and Tory’s trial prosecutors that continued well after his conviction. The October exchange references Milagro, sanctions against Tory’s attorneys and contemplated civil suits. *These messages occurred around the time Milagro got sued and Megan’s documentary came out. The November exchange later discusses a civil RO and Kathy Ta recommending research into civil harassment versus a civil DVRO. It appears prosecutors from Tory’s case gave Megan and/or her team legal advice on how to put a restraining order on him while he’s already in prison…. Is that ethical? Text Exhibit: drive.google.com/file/d/1Xv-…

21 Savage x Latto at the US Open

Jay-Z and Roc Nation's involvement in United Justice Coalition is making sense ! Leveraging their position to gatekeep who receives justice or not, rather than genuinely helping. Jay-Z been obstructing justice using the courts for personal gain to avoid DNA testing so he definitely don't need to be there nor Alex Spiro who always abusing the court system! #FreeTory