This is why the resistance does #XBT (b2b). Interpretation - The big institutional players infiltrated the core devs, then bought off the big mining pools. Everyone else (except us) passively upgraded like lambs to the slaughter... source: Google Gemini #bitcoin #b2b

XBT

Pure water is better than tainted water. Pure money is better than tainted money. That is why there is #xbt #bitcoin on #blake2b

#xbt #bitcoin #blake2b has the highest asymmetric upside of any asset on earth by far.

Cuck (sv1) miners don't get a vote Actual miners get a vote, but not because of hashpower; because they run a node

XBT is Bitcoin

XBT is Bitcoin. We changed the algorithm to Blake2B in order to avoid the continued centralized control of SHA-256 algorithm "Bitcoin". You should pay attention more my friend.

Bitcoin is finite, Bitspam has a soft cap. Demurrage and tail emission coming to spamcoin.

CCP (China) pool dominance is far higher than that even today, and no one seems to care. USA and CCP pool dominance is 90% of the network, and very few Bitcoiners care

teddit.net/r/bitcoinismoney/… #bitcoin on #blake2b #xbt

Was always dumb, but bitcoin becoming the reserve asset was always real

A sly roundabout hardfork 99% laughed at, until they didn't.

🔁REPOST, MUST WATCH INTERVIEW JUNE 15th 2026 Bitcoin isn't digital gold. It's not locked in by math. You can kill it. @_BitcoinMatrix #279 Bitcoin Core Has Gone Rogue | @mattkratter, Bitcoin University The man who ran money at Peter Thiel's hedge fund came on to explain who's trying, and why the only thing protecting Bitcoin is the people who run nodes. Matthew Kratter, Bitcoin University founder, former Clarium / Thiel-world macro trader, early Palantir investor, joins me to lay out the fight consuming Bitcoin right now in plain English: why he says Bitcoin Core has "gone rogue," the spam war over OP_RETURN and BIP-110 he calls Bitcoin's last stand, why consensus flows from culture and not code, who actually controls the network (hint: not the miners), and how to mine Bitcoin from home for about $10 a day. Send this to anyone who thinks Bitcoin can't be stopped. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 01:00 Physics dropout to literature: Stanford & Berkeley 05:27 René Girard & meeting Peter Thiel 07:56 Becoming a trader: Thiel Macro to Clarium 12:43 The PayPal mafia, network effects & the dot-com bottom 20:23 Global macro at Clarium & the 2003 housing-blowup call 24:08 Napster, PayPal & the "new world currency" 28:32 Government as the ultimate customer: Palantir & the CIA (In-Q-Tel) 36:00 Deep-state roots: is Peter Thiel captured? 49:32 Culture is upstream of consensus 57:00 Bitcoin isn't magic: nodes, immutability & the spam risk 1:01:42 Why spam is a problem: tragedy of the commons 1:04:30 Spam since Satoshi & the 2014 OP_RETURN war 1:14:30 The changing of the guard at Bitcoin Core 1:18:43 Core uncaps OP_RETURN to 100,000 bytes 1:28:00 Consensus flows from culture: the 2nd Amendment analogy 1:35:20 BIP-110: the temporary soft fork 1:44:00 Why small blocks, and running nodes in Cuba 2:18:55 SegWit & the 2017 UASF: how 500 nodes won 2:24:00 The miners are just employees: node runners set the rules 2:41:46 "Firing the miners": changing proof-of-work 2:55:18 Bitcoin Core went rogue: the last stand 2:58:50 You can kill Bitcoin 3:01:20 Mine Bitcoin from home for ~$10/day, KYC-free 3:11:09 Where to find Matt ▶️ piped.video/watch?v=xsOjcw6A…

I just have one thought before I go to sleep. Unless you are happy being a hired gun, why would anyone want to do work on the SHA256 chain? It's like, I'm happy to do work as a lawyer as a hired gun, because of all the downstream benefits and immediate financial rewards. That chain is so completely captured and psyoped and riddled with constructive narratives, unless you are just like the lawyers and the bankers and brokers, and everyone else in the fiat world, why would you choose to work on anything involving the SHA256 chain? You would have to be delusional to think it now is, or ever could be in the future, anything initially intended for Bitcoin by Satoshi. So why are people interested in it at all anymore? If not as a yet another fiat controlled area of commerce? It would be far more pleasant if people just took off the literary illusions they are spinning to themselves and and, I guess, a fully involved cult that drank the Kool-Aid and is never giving up that drink. I mean sure, I'll follow Justin Bechler into NGU if I find this is the best way to provide for my son's trust fund he needs because he is chronically ill so he is adequately funded after his dad and I are no longer here. I like more money rather than less as well as the next person. By why pretend this enterprise since BIP-100 exposed the complete and absolute total enmeshment of law, regulation and corporate capture with anything that has to do with the SH A256 chain? I guess the Kool-Aid doesn't wear off for some. @1914ad @mattkratter @NickSzabo4 @LukeDashjr @DavidFBailey @Excellion @adam3us

Capitalism without sound money is not capitalism.

Surprised you even show your face after getting so many wrecked and most likely lending a hand to a few suicides. Let's be real, btc influencer are a stain on society.

All scammers and fiat maxis bitching and crying about the coin maturity softfork. Looks to be having the exact desired effect. Great success so far.

The BLAKE2b long coinbase maturity soft fork is working exactly as designed. Since activation at block 973,440, our node has rejected 6 invalid blocks from 3 different miners — all attempting to spend coinbase rewards that haven't matured under the new consensus rules. 🧵

Spamcoin isn't Bitcoin, it's a centralized fiat airdrop run by a small cartel. They absolutely can take your "bitcoins", with or without government coersion.

We node runners did not fire the miners to change the logo or swap one mining algorithm for another. We fired them to preserve Bitcoin as sovereign money. Money that no state, corporation, miner, pool operator, or other powerful interest gets to rule through capital or coercion. Bitcoin’s rules are chosen by the people willing to run them, and we are free to change those rules when the incentives begin working against Bitcoin’s monetary purpose. And we just proved it again. When opportunistic SV1 hashrate concentrated behind one pool, we extended coinbase maturity rather than accept hashrate dominance as sovereignty. Hashrate may leave. Capital may leave. Miners may leave. But the money stays. So bring the hashrate. Bring the capital. Bring whatever economic leverage you think gives you control on our network. It does not. If your behavior threatens the purpose of the money, the rules will change beneath you. Your hashrate is temporary. The money is not.

No! Bitcoin has actually (big) miners that ignore soft forks that protect node owners. That was no voting, it was a steamrolling. Hence, we parted ways...