I run a boutique full service law firm (commercial transactions, corporate governance, employment, privacy, tax, litigation, etc.) (Margolis PLLC).
I also run a legal ops consulting and staffing company (PointTwo).
“You will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless…”
Indemnify = “I’m going to pay for whatever comes up from this fuckup.”
Defend = “I’m going to hire/pay an attorney to defend you from this fuckup.”
Hold harmless = “Unclear but probably helpful to have if there is a fuckup.”
"A California federal judge ordered Meta on Tuesday to rereview privilege designations on 300 documents in social media addiction litigation, after plaintiffs' lawyers cited a 'culture of privilege abuse' epitomized by Instagram swag hats embroidered with 'a/c priv'"
From Law360: law360.com/articles/2528578
hell yea thanks for sending me another line chart. your dot on the line chart is moving above the other dots. I noticed the dot on the line chart. It moved for sure.
Nobody reads the employee handbook.
I proved it.
Last month I added one sentence on page 73:
“First employee to email HR this sentence gets $1,000.”
Thirty days passed.
Yesterday an analyst finally found it.
I congratulated him and paid the $1,000 immediately.
Then I terminated him.
People don’t randomly read employee handbooks.
They read them when they’re looking for leverage.
$1,000 is a very reasonable price to identify your next lawsuit.
Nobody reads the employee handbook.
I proved it.
Last month I added one sentence on page 73:
“First employee to email HR this sentence gets $1,000.”
Thirty days passed.
Yesterday an analyst finally found it.
I congratulated him and paid the $1,000 immediately.
Then I terminated him.
People don’t randomly read employee handbooks.
They read them when they’re looking for leverage.
$1,000 is a very reasonable price to identify your next lawsuit.
I know people who spent $12k in tokens and built nothing.
@Westpac spent $12k in tokens on @AmpCode and built a new intranet for their 35,000 employees (vs. ~$3–5M pre-AI cost).
"Amp is unlocking a huge amount of value in engineering" from itnews.com.au/news/westpac-s…
Half joking, but we really did make an FDGC model and it’s pretty cool. Putting GCs in office to build out a legal function (with our firm and infrastructure supporting them).
I'm biased, but all these young lawyers (under 5 years) leaving biglaw to start AI native law firms seems to miss the point.
if I were a client, I don't need commodified legal work. I need judgement and many of these lawyers don't even have their training wheels off yet.
For the last time, don’t send me an execution version if it still has placeholders in it.
Call it whatever else you want. But it’s not an execution version if it’s not, you know, ready for execution.