It was an extraordinary banner to see out the front of our parliament building.
Young people have every right to be angry about the housing situation at present. In South Australia, as elsewhere, prices and rents have made independence, a first home and starting a family feel far further out of reach than they ever should. That grievance is certainly real and warranted.
What does not follow is the claim on that banner: that the problem is simply “capitalism,” landlords, or people who already own something. That is a slogan, not an explanation. Housing is built under rules. How much gets approved, how long it takes, what it costs to finance, how tax treats investors and owner-occupiers and how fast population and household formation grow relative to construction; those are the factors that move prices. Savings become the capital that funds dwellings and businesses. Ordinary people accumulate assets inside that system; they are not a cast of villains. The adults who organise or platform school-age protesters have a duty not to hand them a morality performance in place of that map. Students can protest, question the system and debate the alternatives, they should not be told that the person who owns a house, runs a small firm, or has saved for decades is the reason they cannot secure a rental. That gives anger a face and leaves the actual constraints untouched. The defensible position is not “sit down and learn economics.” It is: take the housing crisis seriously enough to talk about supply, rates, planning, tax and population and do not use young people’s frustration as a prop for a theory that cannot tell you how a dwelling actually comes into being.