Comparative political economist. Teaching @BlavatnikSchool, Oxford. Views my own, if at all.

Oxford
Threatening the governor of the Banque de France with prosecution for treason for criticising his policy on French debt cancellation is wildly undisciplined stuff from JLM, six months away from an election he could actually make the second round for.
Le banquier central français, ancien collaborateur direct de Macron, prend publiquement parti contre son pays à l'étranger en appelant implicitement les spéculateurs à sanctionner la France à cause de mes propositions. C'est un acte de trahison. Il n'y aura pas de prescription en 2027. Il sera poursuivi pour cela. Ras-le-bol de ces soi-disant élites qui crient au drame qu'elles veulent créer pour peser sur le peuple.
Community note
L'entretien d'Emmanuel Moulin au Financial Times ne cite ni Mélenchon ni ses propositions et n'appelle pas les spéculateurs à sanctionner la France. Il alerte sur les risques d'une hausse des taux sans redressement des finances publiques. lemonde.fr/economie/artic… lefigaro.fr/conjoncture/de…
55
James Conran retweeted
In this poll, Medicare for All has majority support when told it will eliminate all private insurance. As I keep telling people, it ain’t 2019 anymore. Find new talking points.
A month before the midterms, health care and gas costs tie as voters' top affordability worries. A quarter say they are "very worried" about affording each, ahead of food, utilities and housing. More in our new Health Tracking Poll: on.kff.org/4zgJv6z
5
62
221
8,119
James Conran retweeted
Something which makes me suspicious: People who are hyper-realist on some foreign policy issues and hyper-idealist on others. E.g thinking both 1) In the interests of peace, Ukraine should come to some compromise settlement with Russia, whether or not all their sovereign territory is returned (hyper-realist) and 2) The only acceptable outcome in the Middle East is a single secular Palestinian state where jews and Palestinians live peacefully side-by-side (hyper-idealist).
194
61
892
283,691
James Conran retweeted
Tobias Rausch, the AfD candidate, has just been elected president of the parliament of Saxony-Anhalt - the first far-right figure to hold such a post in the history of the federal republic. Voting figures suggest he may have won some votes from CDU members, as well as AfD/BSW.
4
21
65
7,681
James Conran retweeted
Senior British officials have made it clear to Israel that if the British Consulate in East Jerusalem is closed and British diplomats are expelled, the United Kingdom will respond by expelling 27 Israeli diplomats, along with their families, from Britain, according to two sources familiar with the matter, as stated in a @Jerusalem_Post . The consulate is expected to close on October 8, following an order issued by Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar. The move reportedly comes in response to economic sanctions imposed by the United Kingdom on Judea and Samaria.
90
196
625
170,488
Good thread. The part I’m unconvinced by is the implication that all forms of Zionism have to remain anchored in those historical (and still dominant) foundations - that some form of antiracist post-Zionism or cultural Zionism is by definition impossible.
Replying to @Alonso_GD
These realities [identifying as a Zionist does not make you racist] and [Zionism is premised on racist foundations] can absolutely coexist. I would assume this is the default for most self-identified Zionists. I don’t think most people have thought about this too much as adults
1
54
James Conran retweeted
This is how an Israeli minister responded to the statement "Zionism is racism". By being extraordinarily racist. You cannot make this shit up!
Zarah Sultana is not a British name. And we have zero expectations from Pakistan 🇵🇰
299
865
4,378
65,209
James Conran retweeted
The China Shock research is: — Definitely not responsible for Trump’s views on trade (which are very eccentric) — Extremely influential in how the broader political class has responded to Trump
On "China Shock" research vs policy... Important to debate research, but any suggestion that current US protectionism has anything to do with Autor-Dorn-Hanson's papers seems outlandish to me. Trump thinking on these issues is well documented and goes as far back into the 80s.
7
20
251
30,304
James Conran retweeted
Hegseth: "Today, at my direction, I'm establishing the Office of Religious Affairs. It will report straight to the top -- a direct line to the secretary ... as Psalm 33:12 extolls us, blessed is the nation in which God is the Lord"
3,720
1,501
5,707
7,605,811
James Conran retweeted
Finally, we independently tested the whole BBC News at Six TV package on the speech, since this sort of thing is how more voters would actually experience the speech in reality. All the major metrics increased significantly! Impressive.
2
7
16
2,852
James Conran retweeted
How about voting intention? All videos pushed up Labour VI, but three stood out: economic power/control, water nationalisation and social care/triple lock clip, boosting it by 8-10 points! This is *genuinely impressive* for such a test, esp in an age of cynicism to politicians.
1
8
25
4,068
James Conran retweeted
In the summer of 2021, the current Tory shadow chancellor Andrew Griffith called for the Triple Lock to be put to one side because it was delivering what he viewed as an excessive increase in the state pension. And he hoped “that we can build consensus on what should not really be a subject of controversy but a sensible and pragmatic response to post pandemic management of the economy.” Bit Burnhamesque all that conservativehome.com/2021/08…
62
227
677
290,665
James Conran retweeted
In his speech, the Prime Minister talked about the two things in relation to each other. We showed respondents two excerpts as the main explanatory clips by the BBC yesterday, one on the National Care Service plans and one on the pensions lock adjustment. Instant reactions were positive from almost 7 in 10 respondents (69%), compared to 13% who had a negative response, a NET score of +56. 3/6
1
7
47
5,485
James Conran retweeted
With the Triple Lock reform set out accurately and the savings hypothecated to a National Care Service, a clear majority back it: 64% support it and 15% oppose: net +49. Support outnumbers opposition in every age group, including those most affected: -> 55-64: 61% support, 16% oppose -> 65+: 55% support, 27% oppose 5/6
59
165
538
185,070
James Conran retweeted
Ezra Klein asked Bill Gates whether normal corporate incentives are enough to handle AI risks. Gates doesn’t mince words:
...very interesting & somewhat troubling deep dive look at AI, its potential dangers without control and its potential benefits. Keeping AI out of the hands of people with bad intentions will be the big challenge. nytimes.com/2026/09/29/opini…
128
662
4,961
571,835
James Conran retweeted
The UK is so funny. Between low public pension spending/high senior poverty, and the insane triple lock policy, they've managed to get themselves in a position where their system is both currently inadequate and long term unsustainable.
Replying to @jdcmedlock
Here's a chart of pension spending as % of GDP. The US is notably modest on the public pension side, where we really stand out is our private retirement programs.
16
16
340
47,194
Amusingly, Burnham actually proposed a much softer change to the triple lock than the one YouGov puts in his mouth - indeed part of its genius is that it’s probably impossible to summarise in a sound bite or a survey item.
SNAP POLL / By 48% to 28%, Britons support Andy Burnham's proposal to change the triple lock in order to help fund part of a national care service
2
141
James Conran retweeted
While Ireland has a big issue with housing, today's Eurostat figures show very low levels of overcrowded homes. Irish homes being bigger than the EU average explains much of that.
9
6
26
3,539
James Conran retweeted
This is an important analysis, but I beg to differ on one point. The UK would be ill-advised to challenge the closure order in an Israeli court. Serious questions remain about Israeli courts' competence to adjudicate matters in East Jerusalem. Still, even if they are duly empowered, there are more compelling and decisive reasons not to file suit. Israeli courts see East Jerusalem as an integral part of Israel, and not occupied territory. The UK's appeal will be heard by a court that sees itself as ruling exclusively under Israeli law, while international law is irrelevant. Under these circumstances, contesting Israel's outrageous decision to shut down the Consulate is best done out of court. theguardian.com/politics/202…
5
37
59
7,127