Very disturbing. I asked Grok to make me an image of migrants threatening a bus driver, to go with a tweet about increasing migrant crime against Belgian bus drivers (even leading to the Belgian state bus company telling drivers to stop checking tickets). Grok refused, stating it does not want to "blame migrants" or "single out a group". When I provided Grok with the statistics, it still "did not want to create that kind of narrative". By "narrative" it actually means reality. When I then asked Grok EXACTLY the same, but replaced migrants with "white guys" to go with a tweet about "increasing violence against bus drivers by white guys" it immediately complied. So Grok is willing to create a FAKE narrative as long as it hurts white people, but it is not willing to portray factual reality if it hurts migrants.

If I catch a fish half an inch too long the game warden will teleport in my boat behind me and slit my throat, then fine my family so much we’re left destitute for generations. But foreign Indians can do this with complete immunity.

researchers discovered that women with complete spinal cord injuries who have zero sensation below the waist can still orgasm. the signal bypasses the spinal cord entirely through a nerve called the vagus that runs directly from the cervix to the brainstem. a nerve that the entire field of sexual medicine didn't know carried orgasmic signals until 2004. the vagus nerve is the longest nerve in the body. it runs from the brainstem through the neck, chest, and abdomen. it controls heart rate, digestion, and the parasympathetic nervous system. what nobody expected: it also carries sexual sensation from the cervix directly to the brain through a pathway that doesn't use the spinal cord at all. this means the cervical orgasm that women describe as "full body" and "transcendent" is traveling on a completely different nerve than clitoral orgasm. the clitoris sends signals through the pudendal nerve via the spinal cord. the cervix sends signals through the vagus nerve directly to the brainstem. two orgasms. two pathways. two entirely different neurological experiences. women who have experienced both describe the difference as unmistakable. clitoral orgasm is sharp, focused, and concentrated in the pelvis. vagus nerve orgasm radiates through the entire body, affects breathing and heart rate more dramatically, and produces a euphoria that lasts minutes rather than seconds. the "full body orgasm" is not a figure of speech. it is a literal description of a signal traveling through a nerve that innervates the entire torso. the practical implication: deep penetration that reaches the cervix in a woman who is fully aroused and comfortable is stimulating a nerve pathway that produces an orgasm qualitatively different from any amount of clitoral stimulation. both are real. both are valuable. but they are not the same experience because they are not traveling on the same nerve. the cervix cannot be stimulated effectively unless arousal has been building for 20 to 30 minutes. the vaginal canal lengthens and the cervix lifts during the arousal process called "tenting." attempting deep stimulation before full tenting is painful, not pleasurable. the timing determines which nerve you're accessing. the orgasm that women describe as the most intense of their lives uses a nerve that sexual medicine didn't map until 19 years ago.

The guy who signed the “Stop Nick Shirley Act” is now lecturing America about free press. Bold strategy 😭

It hurts me to see him use the Schlägel incorrectly because his pea-sized brain is incapable to understand basic physics. I hate everything about the world we live in.

++ Ursula #vonderLeyen definitely needs to be charged with her crimes! ++ And she has to be put in front of a jury, and, as far as I am concerned, should be locked up for a very long time for all the evil that she has brought on the citizens in the EU member states.

Why are. Canadian taxpayers paying more than European and American taxpayers per capita to fund the Trillion dollar Ukrainian Russian War?

Racketeering Expose by Derrick Sweet Sept 20\26 My name is Derrick Sweet. I am a 61 year old Canadian and earn my living as a stock market analyst. I follow money for a living. I began my career in investing in 1993 at Midland Walwyn in Toronto as a Financial Advisor. After establishing myself as a successful advisor I was recruited by BMO Nesbitt Burns in 1997 and offered the position of Vice President and Senior Investment Advisor and presented with a $250,000.00 signing bonus, which was a lot of money back then. For several years I was one of the top advisors in Canada and a regular invited speaker at investment conferences across Canada. By 2002 I had sold my business to a bank and some time after that I started offering stock research reports to DIY investors who manage their own money. I provide this background on who I am so you have a better understanding how I discovered possible acts of racketeering. I have been closely following Mark Carney’s violations of the trust he was voted to uphold for too long. I am not a lawyer and am not making any former charges against Mark Carney in this post. I am simply pointing out activities by the PM of Canada that are a direct conflict of interest that could possibly lead to several charges of racketeering. The Prosecution Case Against Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada (the PM) I. The Core Allegation: "Pay-to-Play" Infrastructure The prosecution will argue that the Prime Minister (PM) has operated a criminal enterprise where public policy and taxpayer-funded contracts were used as a vehicle to inflate the value of a private entity (Brookfield) in which he holds a direct pecuniary interest (stock options). The Nexus: The Acts: 42 distinct government deals awarded to or partnered with Brookfield. The Benefit: $5 billion in reported profits for the entity. The Conflict: Multi-million dollar stock options held by the decision-maker (the PM). II. Count 1: Breach of Trust (Criminal Code s. 122) Under Section 122, we do not need to prove a "bribe" was paid. We only need to prove that the PM, in connection with his duties, committed a Breach of Trust that would be an offence even if committed against a private person. The Evidence: Duty of Office: The PM is mandated by the Conflict of Interest Act to "arrange private affairs to prevent conflicts of interest" (s. 5). The Breach: By failing to divest or recuse himself from a policy environment that directly benefits a company where he holds options, he has fundamentally violated the trust of the Canadian public. Legal Standard: Per R. v. Boulanger, the prosecution must show the act was a "marked departure from the standards expected of an individual in the accused's position." Managing 42 deals while holding the stock is a "marked departure" by any reasonable standard. III. Count 2: Frauds on the Government (Criminal Code s. 121) This is the Canadian version of "racketeering." Specifically, Section 121(1)(c) prohibits an official from demanding or accepting a benefit for themselves in exchange for "assistance" or "exercise of influence" regarding government dealings. The Strategy: We will argue that the Stock Options constitute an "advantage or benefit." The value of these options is tied directly to the success of the 42 government-backed deals. Every time the PM announces a deal, he effectively "cuts himself a check" by driving up the equity value of the firm. IV. Count 3: Organized Corruption (The "Racketeering" Element) To push this into the realm of organized crime/racketeering, we look at the Enterprise (the Liberal Party/PMO) and the Pattern of Activity. The Enterprise: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO). The Pattern: A series of 42 separate transactions. In racketeering law, we look for "Continuity and Relationship." Relationship: All deals involve the same beneficiary (Brookfield). Continuity: The deals spanned a significant period of time and continue as long as the PM holds office. V. The "Smoking Gun": Intent (Mens Rea) The defense will claim the PM has a "Blind Trust." I have dismantled this below: Transparency vs. Blinding: If the PM knows he has the options (which is public knowledge), the trust is not "blind." The $5 Billion Profit Announcement: We will present evidence that the PM was aware of the financial health of the company while simultaneously crafting legislation (like the CLARITY Act or housing initiatives) that specifically favors Brookfield’s asset classes. This is not a series of unfortunate coincidences. This is a closed-loop system of enrichment. The Prime Minister is using the sovereign authority of Canada as a marketing arm for a private corporation. He is both the 'Grantor' of the contracts and the 'Grantee' of the profits. In the private sector, this is insider trading. in the public sector, this is a Racket." CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Draft Criminal Referral – s. 121 & s. 122 Criminal Code (Canada) TARGET: The Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada NEXUS: Financial Entanglements with Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) DATE: February 13, 2026 I. PREAMBLE & JURISDICTION This referral outlines a prima facie case for investigation by the RCMP Sensitive and International Investigations Unit. The allegations concern a systematic pattern of conduct wherein the subject, in his capacity as Prime Minister, has influenced or directed federal policy and contracts toward Brookfield Corporation (and its subsidiaries) while maintaining a multi-million dollar personal financial stake in said corporation via unexercised stock options and carried interest. II. STATEMENT OF FACTS Direct Interest: As of February 12, 2026, the subject remains the holder of approximately $6.8 million USD in Brookfield stock options (calculated at market value), with expiration dates extending into 2033/2034. The "Profit Nexus": On February 12, 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported annual distributable earnings of $5.4 billion USD, an 11% increase. This profit spike coincided with a series of 42 federal "deals" or policy partnerships announced during the subject’s tenure. Conflict of Interest Screen Failure: Testimony provided to the House Ethics Committee in late 2025 confirmed that 95% of Brookfield-owned companies (approximately 1,900 entities) are not covered by the subject’s current "ethics screen," allowing for direct interaction between the PMO and entities that contribute to the subject’s future performance pay. Policy Correlation: Specific federal initiatives—including the $3B auto sector save-out and the AI Infrastructure Fund—directly align with Brookfield’s core 2026 investment strategies (AI infrastructure and energy transition). III. APPLICABLE OFFENCES (CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA) COUNT 1: Breach of Trust by Public Officer (s. 122) The Theory: The subject has exercised the powers of the Prime Minister’s Office for a purpose other than the public good—specifically, the appreciation of his private equity holdings. Evidence: The subject’s refusal to divest (liquidate) his assets, despite public warnings from the Ethics Commissioner and the Clerk of the Privy Council that a "blind trust" is insufficient for assets as large and specific as Brookfield carried interest. COUNT 2: Frauds on the Government (s. 121(1)(c)) The Theory: The subject, being an official, has "accepted or agreed to accept" an advantage (the appreciation of stock options and carried interest) from a person/entity (Brookfield) that has active and ongoing dealings with the Government of Canada. Evidence: The "carried interest" held by the subject is a direct performance-based payout. Every federal contract awarded to a Brookfield-managed fund (e.g., the Global Transition Fund) serves as an indirect "commission" or "reward" to the subject. IV. INVESTIGATIVE ROADMAP To move from "referral" to "indictment," the following evidence must be secured via production orders: Internal PMO Communications: All emails between the PMO and Bruce Flatt/Justin Beber (Brookfield executives) regarding the 42 specific deals. Blind Trust "Bypass" Logs: Records of "recusal failures" where the subject was present for decisions impacting Brookfield subsidiaries not covered by the s. 1,900-company screen. Option Exercise Strategy: Correspondence between the subject’s trustee and Brookfield regarding the optimal "cashing out" window relative to government policy announcements. V. CONCLUSION The legal threshold for a Section 122 investigation is a "marked departure" from the standard of trust. The simultaneous management of the Canadian economy and the holding of a performance-based stake in a company receiving 40+ federal deals meets this threshold. I have broken down the 42 Critical Deals and Policy Alignments between the Canadian Federal Government and the Brookfield ecosystem as of early 2026. In a racketeering case, we don't just look for "contracts"; we look for "The Pattern." These deals are categorized by how they directly feed the valuation of the PM’s private equity holdings. The "Brookfield 42" Portfolio Analysis Category A: The Infrastructure & Housing "Mega-Deals" (14 Deals) These deals leverage the 2025/2026 federal budget initiatives to de-risk Brookfield's massive real estate and modular construction divisions. The Build Canada Homes Initiative: A $36 Billion federal program. Our investigation shows Brookfield-owned modular housing firms received the lion's share of "fast-track" status. Canada Growth Fund (CGF) Backstopping: 4 specific "Carbon Capture" deals where the federal CGF provides "price certainty" for Brookfield’s decarbonization projects, effectively guaranteeing their 15-20% IRR (Internal Rate of Return). The BGIS Master Contract Extension: Brookfield Global Integrated Services (BGIS) continues to manage 3,800+ federal buildings. Even though Brookfield sold its majority stake, it retains a "carried interest" in the performance of the legacy contracts. Category B: The "Green Transition" Payouts (18 Deals) This is the most egregious category for a racketeering charge because the PM personally co-headed these funds before taking office. The Global Transition Fund (GTF) Infusion: Federal pension oversight boards (under PM influence) have directed over $12 Billion into the GTF. Wind West & Nova Scotia Offshore: 6 deals where federal "nod" and subsidies were given to offshore wind projects where Brookfield is the lead equity partner. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): 2 deals for the Darlington SMR project. Brookfield’s acquisition of Westinghouse (nuclear tech) makes them the primary beneficiary of this federal nuclear push. Category C: The "Digital Sovereignty" & AI Build-out (10 Deals) A new 2026 frontier. Brookfield recently launched a $100 Billion AI Infrastructure program. Sovereign Data Centres: 3 contracts awarded to Brookfield subsidiaries to build "Sovereign AI" data centres in Quebec and Ontario. The "Microsoft Framework" Tailwinds: While the deal is between Microsoft and Brookfield, federal tax credits for "Clean Energy for AI" (passed in the 2025 budget) effectively subsidized $10.5 Gigawatts of Brookfield-owned power facilities. Prosecutorial Conclusion on the 42 Deals If we were in court today, I would argue that these are not 42 separate coincidences, but 42 bricks in a wall of private enrichment. The fact that 95% of Brookfield’s 1,900 subsidiaries are not screened means the PM can sit in a meeting about "Critical Mineral Supply Chains" (a Category C deal) and make a decision that enriches a Brookfield subsidiary he technically doesn't "know" he owns—yet his stock options move upward regardless. Attorney's Note: The $5.4 Billion profit reported yesterday is the "fruit of the poisonous tree." We would argue those profits were only possible because of the de-risking provided by the Canadian taxpayer through these 42 deals. If you believe I have presented proof of racketeering please do the following; 1) Share immediately on your time time - change your privacy settings to public for this post. 2) Share it with a conservative alternative media organization and your local MP. 3) Follow up with your MP and demand an investigation by law enforcement. 4) Remember, no one is above the law, not even Mark Carney.

🚨 JAW-DROPPING MOMENT: Somali "child care" in Minnesota... "It says you have 102 children here, and you got $2.66 million dollars in funding?" SOMALI: "THAT IS HARASSMENT!!" *Door SLAMS shut* 🤯 It's literally everywhere. Police have a LOT more Somali buildings to raid. 📽️ @nickshirleyy

Remember this everyone: She votes. And an army of people like her vote too. If you metaphorically take your ball home and refuse to vote in the midterms…. Then you’re really voting for people like this lady to decide the future of our country.

At this point, the federal gov’t should assign Nick a security detail. He’s doing AG level investigations without the title. National security type work.

🇺🇸 This is what American power looks like. 14-year-old Laura Montero’s appendix burst 550 miles from the nearest surgeon while on a cruise off Baja. The USS Ronald Reagan — a nuclear aircraft carrier with thousands of sailors — changed course overnight, launched a helicopter, hoisted her off the cruise ship in a basket, and performed emergency surgery at sea. She was already septic. They saved her life. That’s the U.S. Navy. That’s what we do. Never apologize for this country.

The truth shall set you free

🚨BREAKING: Alice Weidel, the likely future leader of Germany says: “In my first 100 days, I will close the borders, eliminate social benefits for migrants, and carry out Germany’s largest deportations.”

The crime against history most don’t know about… ISIS destroyed Assyrian archeology. They burnt Aramaic manuscripts. They blew up Old Testament history including the Tomb of Jonah. They erased ancient Churches, driving Assyrians out of Nineveh. How much was lost?

“If women are free to dress as they please, then men should be free to rape them. How can you be free and we not be free?.” This, ladies and gentlemen, is Islam.

Any agency in Canada that doesn’t publicly reject this bastardization of history, and an insult to the souls lost during our largest terrorist attack in US history will no longer have friend in this FBI… Not to mention our heroes that responded in the aftermath 🇺🇸 WE WILL NEVER FORGET 9-11 foxnews.com/media/cbc-tells-…

RT @SanchoGarcesI: Esta es la Europa que nos vendió la izquierda woke.

Fascinating how so many people are out here saying “this doesn’t happen” and “this is a made up MAGA problem.” So let me shed some light… This happened to my little girl (and at the time I was a staunch Democrat who had just voted for Joe Biden.) I went public and discovered it had happened to many others. I sued all the way to the Supreme Court — along with other affected parents. The school district admitted to and defended it, in legal documents. Justice Alito called our case “troubling and tragic” and an issue of “great and growing national importance.” It was a living nightmare that almost destroyed my child. But willfully ignorant TDS sufferers will claim mine was an isolated incident… So here are some other lawsuits from affected families that anyone can research, each with hundreds of pages of evidence: These have reached Supreme Court: • John and Jane Parents v Montgomery County (23-601) • Parents Protecting Our Children v Eau Claire (23-1180) • Foote v Ludlow (25-77) • Lee v Poudre (25-89) **my case** • Littlejohn v Leon (25-289) • Lavigne v Great Salt Bay (25-759) These other cases have been filed in lower courts all over the country: • Doe v Weiser (Colorado) • Mead v Rockford Public School District (Michigan) • Vitsaxaki v Skaneateles Central SD (New York) • Lema v Davenport (New Jersey) • Regina v Staley (California) • Doe/Heaps v Delaware Valley (New Jersey) • Blair v Appomattox (Virginia) • Konen v Spreckles (California) • Perez v Broskie (Florida) • Koltenbach v Hilliard City Schools (Ohio) • DF/Figliola v Harrisonburg City Schools (Virginia) • Wiley v Sweetwater County School District (Wyoming) • Parents Defending Ed v Linn-Mar (Iowa) • TF v Kettle Moraine (Wisconsin) So many other brave parents have come forward with FACTS about their child’s secret school transition: @bourne_beth2345, @ErinFriday75490, @LydiamamaTerf, @AlyashchenkoX, @nogenderpredtrs just to name a few. The gaslighting phase has ended. Parents who’ve endured the horrors of the secret school transition of our kids can no longer be denied. There’s too many of us now. We’re going to end this nightmare for other parents, no matter how many people play pretend that we don’t exist.

If you were ever in Cornwall before the Muslim invasion, you’d have an even greater understanding of this tragedy. There couldn’t be a sadder nor more infuriating catastrophe. And it’s happening in beautiful America at lightning speed. These vermin have got to go. Every one.