Israil me bhi EVM nahi hai? Bc

Should i block this clown?

El wey que no es "ni izquierda ni derecha" cuando gana la izquierda:

Bc what is this account? 😭😭 A grade ragebait for politicians

Pretty biased post ngl 😉 2014: Effective tax free income: 7.5 L (Considering 80c, insurance, interest and related savings) 2026: 12.75L (considering standard rebate) You may ask - that's still 70% increase right? Let me introduce you to cp inflation (between 2014 to 2026): 97.4% So, if govt had adjusted against inflation, it would still have been: 14.775 L

Another reason to hate fanta party

बड़ी खबर: दलित समाज के पूर्व IAS राम बहादुर जी 26 अक्टूबर को समाजवादी पार्टी की सदस्यता ग्रहण करेंगे। राम बहादुर जी ने बहन मायावती जी के साथ काफी करीब रहकर प्रदेश के लिए काम किया है।

BJP Chief Minister mocking Dalits just before Uttar Pradesh Elections. Hope the Samajwadi Party spreads this video widely across the State.

BJP IT Cell keeps claiming crime has declined under Yogi. Here’s the NCRB data on crimes against children in UP: 2016: 16,079 2024: 22,222 Increase: +38% Even with underreporting, the numbers rose under him. Lets take the facts to the people.

BJP IT Cell keeps claiming crime has declined under Yogi. Here’s the NCRB data on crimes against Scheduled Castes in UP: 2016: 10,426 2024: 14,642 Increase: +40% Even with underreporting, the numbers rose under him SP Boys, this narrative is being pushed hard. Counter it with data before it settles. Take the facts to the people.

BJP IT Cell is pushing hard that crime has declined under Yogi. Here’s the NCRB data on crimes against women in UP: 2016: 49,262 2024: 66,398 Increase: +34.8% Even with underreporting, the numbers went up under him. SP Boys, this narrative is spreading fast, lets counter it with data before it sticks. Take the facts to the people.

Trump also announced it before modi

Fanta supporters as soon as sp media cells responds in their own way:

Please repost this. hi @ICEgov @ICEgovERO @america @elonmusk @FBIDirectorKash @ChrisLandauUSA @DeputySecState This traitor (@aravind) is working in New York on h1b visa and wishes bad for the America, calling America a loserpower and wishes for the end of American state (America murdabad slogan means this). He is villainising america and americans on twitter, his entire profile is around hating america and portraying them as villains to the world. He should be deported back to India, who is a superpower according to him, which is good for all of us feel. He will hurt america more than he will ever pay taxes. Also, you can give his job to any white american. We will fund his american airlines seat to delhi from america.

Sure bro

Just calling out your flawed logic that eligibility criteria and merit criteria are two seperate variables Whether to offer relaxation on eligibility criteria is open debate Btw, Ik aapko name dekh ke judge karne ki aadat hogi, but wgaf about what 48y/o aunty thinks in 2026

Watching Dhurandhar 4 to finally understand why modi ji kept the eMundhra keys as 0x4 to catch anti-nationals who were not paying 17% mandatory viswaguru tax to boost economy

Does age relaxation mean a candidate has compromised on merit? Let's use a simple Anology. Suppose a UPPSC exam has an upper age limit of 40 years and the open-category cutoff is 370 marks. Churchill, aged 32, scores 390. Neha, aged 25, scores 290. Churchill qualifies. Neha doesn't. Why? Because the selection is based on marks, not on who is younger. Age determines eligibility, and marks determine merit. Now introduce a third candidate: an SC candidate, aged 42, who is eligible through age relaxation and scores 400 marks. Should this candidate be denied an open-merit seat merely because age relaxation allowed them to appear? My argument is simple: the benefit that enables someone to compete is not a benefit that improves their performance. Let's take help of these three concepts to explain this: 1. Variable separation: Eligibility and examination performance are two distinct variables. One determines entry into the competition and the other measures performance within it. 2. Causal independence: Age relaxation does not, by itself, cause a candidate to score higher marks. The candidate still has to earn those marks in the examination. 3. Controlled comparison: Compare candidates on the same final selection criteria. If one scores 400 and another scores 370, the former has demonstrated higher performance on that measure. Did you get the difference between "access to the competition" and "performance in the competition". Of course, recruitment rules must be followed. But unless the governing rules expressly make a particular relaxation a bar to migration, why should the mere fact of receiving age relaxation erase a candidate's higher examination score? So, what should people like Neha do, who have shared a donation link? Well they should actually debate on "Should reserved category candidates be given relaxation in eligibility of a competition?" because their current campaign has hit dead-end even before starting