The views expressed on this feed are my own and no one else's. Enjoy! Avi created by Freepik

Social security is a PONZI SCHEME that GOVERNMENT CREATED to STEAL YOUR MONEY for THEIR purposes and GIVE TO OTHERS. The math doesn’t even make sense to anyone with a BRAIN. Simple example: SS return is about 2.2% Market Return 8% Conservatively in Mutual Funds
Social Security benefits are based on these 3 things: -Average income -Birth year -When you start taking money out Here’s how much you’ll earn if you make $40,000 a year. cnb.cx/37zd32I #investinyou (In partnership with @acorns.)
22
8
44
🇺🇸 Just My Opinion 🇺🇸 retweeted
Replying to @ginamilan_
It's the one time she actually spoke truthfully and honestly in her whole career
2
1
26
4,841
“Social impact litigators” May as well have kids said ambulance chasing.
A message to Jane Doe and her legal team: Our organization @reckoningaction is partnered with some of the most powerful social impact litigators in the country who are interested in pursuing novel and aggressive legal pathways to ensure that your identity remains protected from publication. We’re here to help ❤️
11
Mental illness folks. What has happened to women in America? Honest to god a huge swath of them are mentally ill.
I honestly do not know one woman who hasn’t at some point in her life been scared of a man in her life. Not one. Let that sink in a few minutes.
9
This is the level of mental illness men today have to deal with from women. A TEXT is rape. A TEXT.
She was raped the moment that text was sent. He didn't ask her if he could send it. He didn't ask her if he could invite participants on her behalf. He didn't ask her name by name, all 50+ men, if she wanted to have sex with them. Consent is explicit, detailed, & enthusiastic
11
Two recent events display the cognitive degradation of way too many women and their ability to reason and use logic with a foundation of fact: 1. Supporting Lindsey Clancy 2. Staunchly lecturing and screeching, despite a plethora of contradictory evidence, about rape.
1
11
🇺🇸 Just My Opinion 🇺🇸 retweeted
Replying to @AFpost
The "journalists" at Cornell need to be expelled from school and sued into oblivion.
9
64
4,477
121,047
Notice how this ends the bullshit screeching shrew lectures about WHY DIDN’T ANYONE DO ANYTHING ABOUT THE TRXTS?!? TEACH YOUR BOYS!!! TWO BOYS DID when they saw it and checked on her. She said she was FINE. She was COHERENT. She said it was “normal in medieval times.”
Cornell fraternity brothers have a different account of the "rape case." Gillio Lopes alleges Jane Doe sexually assaulted him, initiating contact without consent. The Cornell Sun doxxed Lopes as a rapist. Winston Lee also says Doe initiated unwanted contact. Lee later asked to join sexual activity, cautioning Doe that she could leave, before Lee claims that Doe affirmed everyone was "consenting adults." Scott Kretzschmar said he was "befuddled" reading Jonathan Newell's message, with Scott Norris adding that he was "concerned." Kretzschmar and Norris said that Doe was conscious and coherent, Doe says that the pair were "voyeurs" more than anything. The Cornell Sun doxxed them both as rapists. Diego Sarabia, who has lost his job at Wells Fargo because of the affair, said he was "concerned" when he walked in, but Doe assured him the orgy was "normal in medieval times." Follow: @AFpost
11
Okay these are truthful statements without question. How do we know? The things they said and what she said are not what someone would think to make up if lying. “They were voyers” “(Orgies were) normal in medieval times.” MEDIEVAL TIMES?!
Cornell fraternity brothers have a different account of the "rape case." Gillio Lopes alleges Jane Doe sexually assaulted him, initiating contact without consent. The Cornell Sun doxxed Lopes as a rapist. Winston Lee also says Doe initiated unwanted contact. Lee later asked to join sexual activity, cautioning Doe that she could leave, before Lee claims that Doe affirmed everyone was "consenting adults." Scott Kretzschmar said he was "befuddled" reading Jonathan Newell's message, with Scott Norris adding that he was "concerned." Kretzschmar and Norris said that Doe was conscious and coherent, Doe says that the pair were "voyeurs" more than anything. The Cornell Sun doxxed them both as rapists. Diego Sarabia, who has lost his job at Wells Fargo because of the affair, said he was "concerned" when he walked in, but Doe assured him the orgy was "normal in medieval times." Follow: @AFpost
9
Replying to @CheyenneHuntCA
Was her sluttery a factor in YOUR assessment?
1
89
🇺🇸 Just My Opinion 🇺🇸 retweeted
The fact the Jane Doe is also suing the bar for serving her one drink when she was underage shows how she doesn’t believe she should held responsible for anything she did leading up to the going to the fraternity
Governor Hochul recognizes that the unpleasant incident at Cornell probably didn’t meet a definition of rape under New York Law. As defined in New York law, a person who has voluntarily consumed alcohol and drugs can still consent to sexual activity if they are conscious and able to speak. There is significant evidence, including the complainant’s own statements, that indicated Jane Doe in the Cornell incident verbally consented to the sex acts that occurred in the Chi Phi house, and that she actively participated in them, and that she only began to perceive these acts as nonconsensual weeks later when the fraternity’s president disinvited her from a Halloween party at the frat house that she badly wanted to attend. The only argument that these acts were nonetheless rape is if the woman’s apparent consent was invalid due to her intoxication. The law in New York is clear on the question: It was not. Governor Hochul therefore wants to expand the law to recategorize a lot of sex that is currently noncriminal as serious felonies. Despite the fact that Governor Hochul, by arguing that the law in New York needs to change to encompass the events at Cornell, she is implicitly recognizing that those events likely do not meet the legal definition of a crime that can be prosecuted, she has removed the local district attorney for reaching a legal finding consistent with this analysis. She has appointed Attorney General Tish James to go to Ithaca and prosecute these men without regard for what the law says.
41
237
4,411
107,867
🇺🇸 Just My Opinion 🇺🇸 retweeted
They treated her as an object exactly to the degree that she treated them, and herself, as objects. She behaved whorishly and degraded herself, and so did they. But she’s the one trying to satiate her guilt by destroying the lives of the other people involved. So ultimately she is the villain in this story. Though there are no heroes at all.
So then why don’t you blame the men for treating a woman as an object then?
320
1,021
14,767
317,756
One of the best summaries of the Cornell situation. I know this isn’t a 3 minute screeching yelling Instagram Reel or TikTok and requires you to read and understand actual substantiated facts, but this is literally the entire situation.
Replying to @TSC @graceauta101_
NO! She said no to a foursome This is all according to her own sworn statement in 2024, that she double checked & made 20 of her own handwritten notations on (which is normal procedure), & then signed as correct 27 days after the night at the frat house. She had sex with 4 men. The other 3 never had sex with her. She had 3 threesomes with guys 1-4 in different combos throughout the night. She stated that the 3rd one felt “coerced”. But she agreed was not forced. They were all high on ketamine & alcohol. She rated her level of intoxication at each point throughout the night from 1-10. She rated it at 5 out of 10, when she agreed to the first threesome. By the time she went to sleep at 5:45, she rated herself at 8/10. She snorted ketamine off a guys erection & let a guy snort it off her “perfect body” at one point during the night. She stated that guy number 1 was so intoxicated at the 1st threesome of the night, that he passed out & couldn’t keep it up. So she continued with the other guy instead, but he was so intoxicated that he started dry heaving & she “patted his back”. So they were obviously more intoxicated than her at that point. When guy number 7 started to kiss her later in the night, she “backed away” & he left her alone. He didn’t force her further into anything. One guy reached for her vagina, & she “swatted his hand away” & told him “I’m tired” (clarified in statement) & he never had sex with her according to her 1st statement. When another guy suggested a foursome, according to her own statement she said “”hell no” because that would include anal”. When they made suggestions she didn’t like they listened to her. No one forced her to have sex. When several other guys came into the room, she ran to the other bed & got under the covers “because she was “horrified” & “embarrassed they saw her naked”. She said she never passed out, lost consciousness, or fell asleep till 5:45 when she told the guys she was tired & needed to sleep, & only two guys were with her at that time. She stated that sexual activity stopped at that time. She slept till 10:00am & then one of the guys drove her home. Later that day she learned it was getting around campus & she was “embarrassed” about that. She told her roommate that if anyone asked about it, “tell them nothing happened”. Even if you want to say she lied on her first statement, her text messages reported on by several major news outlets, prove that it was not r&pe & was consensual & legal. She continued a relationship with guy number one for several weeks after the frat house party. In her text to him she wanted to meet up with him again, smoke & have sex, but without the “key and 5 billion” other guys. As news spread about the orgy, she claimed they did “nothing illegal” and “everyone is just jealous”, even saying she loved him (I luv you king). She defended her right to be sexually diverse in her text messages, & said that all the people talking about it were immature, & that she was very sexually liberal & “sexually adventurous”. Later in her text to him, she said she was so “embarrassed” that everyone knew & it was “ruining her life”. 11 days after the frat house party, she was asking to go to the same house for a Halloween party, but then the president decided that she shouldn’t come “for her own good” because of the rumors that had already spread, & then she got angry in her text messages to 3 of the guys she continued texting with. 7 days later, Nov 7, she & guy number 1 broke up. That same day she went & had a SA kit done at the hospital. She reported the incident to CUPD on Nov 8. Nov 14-15 she recorded formal interview with CUPD investigator, Cornell Title IX investigator, & a victim advocate. Why would a r&pe victim, get so mad she was uninvited to go to the same fraternity house that supposedly gang r&ped her? With all of the same guys present? Why would she WANT to go back? This is all in the text messages reported by the news.
30
Steps: Goes to police. Interviewed for 2 days explaining rape. Provided summary statement that has no mention of rape. Real Victim: “This statement is the opposite of what I told you and doesn’t even say rape anywhere! Change this!” Lucy: “Looks good.”
The Cornell campus police officer condensed Jane Doe's original statement - and in doing so, he dismissed and omitted the fact that she reported being raped. He rewrote her story and omitted violent felonies. He needs to be stripped of his badge and held to account.
6
We don’t know if this is true but I’ll grant it. Lucy reviewed the 6 page SWORN statement and made over 20 edits before signing. You want us to believe a gang rape victim read the statement, made edits, and signed it w/o realizing “gang rape” wasn’t in it?
The Cornell campus police officer condensed Jane Doe's original statement - and in doing so, he dismissed and omitted the fact that she reported being raped. He rewrote her story and omitted violent felonies. He needs to be stripped of his badge and held to account.
15
Um what? Folks, yes doesn’t mean yes. And consent isn’t consent. And if you don’t shouldn’t be around kids.
If you don't understand that there's more to consent than just saying "yes" then you should never be left alone with children.
9
Hey Molly, certainly you know the opposite is also true, very true actually. Just because someone is found not guilty in court and may agree to a settlement DOES NOT MEAN they are guilty of what they’re accused of. Settlements happen all the time.
7
If I had a job for him I’d hire him immediately. This is one of the most mentally insane things I think I’ve seen in awhile. I didn’t even believe it when I saw it.
🚨🇺🇸 Cancel culture just fired a play by play guy for tweets he wrote at 15 The Blazers hired Braiden Bell on Thursday and dumped him hours later. The posts are from 2012 and 2013, one about Asian people, others calling girls sluts. Let's be clear. Saying that stuff is stupid, but leaving a man jobless for it, when he was still a teenager, is the part that doesn't add up. He's 29, he apologized, and nothing like it showed up from his adult years. A kid's bad joke outlived the man who stopped making them. Source: NYP / Writer: Lucas
23
🇺🇸 Just My Opinion 🇺🇸 retweeted
The Left has spent decades systematically eliminating every moral rule and standard governing human sexuality. The only one they've left standing is "consent." The problem is that sex can be immoral and degrading even when it is consensual. So when a woman feels gross and sad and embarrassed after a sexual encounter -- even when it was fully consensual (as it was in the Cornell case) -- the only moral language she has available to describe her feelings is based around consent. Therefore any sex that makes her feel bad after the fact must have been ipso facto non-consensual. The concept of sex that was wrong yet consensual is foreign to her. She has been told, and has believed, that "wrong yet consensual" is a category that cannot exist.
503
1,844
18,468
481,791
One of the best posts in this entire mess. Right to the damn point. Vividly.
Replying to @Amwysoc
Snorting drugs off dicks makes you ineligible for sexual assault claims. That might sound blanketingly ignorant, but I'm sorry... when you are snorting drugs off dicks you are consenting to whatever happens in the world of snorting drugs off dicks.
1
19
🇺🇸 Just My Opinion 🇺🇸 retweeted
Carl Higbie is a patriot 🫡
Replying to @DrunkRepub
@DrunkRepub Hey you’re famous! Congrats! Carl Higbie just featured you on his show!!
101
87
936
14,081