The @LPNational has new leadership, the core of a great judicial committee, and passed some key bylaws reforms including introducing electronic voting in the future. A new LPNH that doesn’t work for the Republican Party will be welcomed to affiliate status soon. It’s the job of all radical libertarians to work with their local, state, and national parties to keep the Party on track ideologically and support candidates with strong libertarian messaging. We hope you’ll join us in that work! Join your local/state lp, the national party, and *lastly* the @LPRadicals to move us onward 💕

Absolutely this

Dismantle the Duopoly. Fire the Uniparty.

#liberty indeed LPRC Platform Section 1.20 Protection of Privacy: "The individual's right to privacy must not be infringed. Governments must not use electronic or other means of covert surveillance of an individual's actions or private property without the express consent of the owner or occupant. Correspondence, financial transactions and records, medical records, legal records, employment records, and the like must not be open to review without the express consent of all parties involved in those actions."

#liberty indeed LPRC Platform Section 1.19 Civil Asset Forfeiture: "The only just case for involuntarily seizing another's property is to set right an injustice such as theft. Civil asset forfeiture takes the property of individuals before any criminal guilt is found and often deprives them of that property far longer than is reasonable, if not indefinitely. Civil asset forfeiture is legal plunder in the most literal sense; it is the law stealing that which it wishes without the burden of proof or the necessity of a crime."

⛽️ ⛽️ ⛽️

<we’re offering to be on the demo crew>

Depressingly yes

Logic seems to be legit.

Statement from members of the Libertarian National Committee re “Trump Dividend” September 10, 2026 Last night in Dallas, President Trump opened the Republican Party’s first midterm convention with a promise that every adult citizen would receive a $5,000 “Trump Dividend”—but only if Republicans keep both houses of Congress. That is not fiscal policy. It is vote-buying, announced on a national stage by a man whose record of broken economic promises is already long. The arithmetic is not mysterious. There are roughly 270 million adults in the United States. Five thousand dollars each is more than $1.3 trillion. The federal government already runs annual deficits approaching $2 trillion and carries a national debt of tens of trillions. The President offered no offsetting cuts, no credible revenue source, and no statutory path.  This is not a new habit. Americans were previously told they would receive $2,000 “tariff dividends.” They were told a “DOGE dividend” of $5,000 was coming. Those checks never arrived. The same pattern of grand announcement followed by silence or walk-back is already visible: within hours, the Vice President began qualifying who might actually receive the money. Libertarians know that prosperity does not come from politicians auctioning other people’s money in exchange for votes. It comes from leaving people free to keep what they earn, trade without political permission, and plan their lives without waiting for the next campaign promise. A $5,000 check funded by more borrowing or more taxes is not a dividend; it is a transfer that inflates the currency, crowds out private investment, and mortgages the future of all Americans. Voters are not shareholders in a corporation called “the United States of America, Trump Division.” They are individuals who already pay for the government’s failures. Offering them a fraction of their own confiscated wealth, conditional on handing one party continued power, is the oldest trick in democratic politics, dressed up as generosity. The Libertarian Party will continue to tell voters the unfashionable truth: no party that treats the Treasury as a campaign slush fund deserves another term of control. Real dividends come from lower taxes, fewer barriers, and a government small enough that it cannot buy elections with money it does not have. Signers (as of 9/10/26 4pm ET): Susan Hogarth, LNC Region 5 Representative Travis Bost, LNC Region 5 Alternate Olivia Hayse, LNC Region 7 Representative Keith Thompson, LNC At-large Representative Alex Flores, LNC Region 9 Representative Austin Martin, LNC Region 1 Representative Alfa Shaw, LNC Region 6 Representative Richard Longstreth, LNC At-large Representative Mimi Robson, LNC Region 5 Representative Sonja Feintech, LNC Region 1 Alternate Rose Leatherman, LNC Region 8 Alternate Michelle Wigington, LNC Region 7 Alternate Kelly Nguyen, LNC At-large Representative

#liberty indeed LPRC Platform Section 1.18 Safeguards for the Criminally Accused: "People must be accorded all possible respect for their individual rights until such time as they are proven guilty of a crime. The rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty must not be denied. We oppose labeling cases as civil in order to avoid the due process protections of criminal law and we further oppose pretrial seizure of property."

💯

Libertarianism is about removing arbitrary barriers between people who want to peacefully engage with one another. It is the political philosophy that respects the individual and fosters social cooperation; that recognizes both the value of tradition and the advantage of change.

Projection much?

I really hate the ignorant cowards advocating for a prison state watched 24/7 by spyware. They call it “safety”… Yeah, I guess a prison cell is “safer” than liberty- but it’s not worth the trade off, and if they honestly believe it is, I’ll help pay for their emigration to North Korea. They’d be happier there, and we’ll be better off if they aren’t here. With our scary liberty.

As a matter of fact, fusionism is always destined to fail. You can not fuse two things that are opposites. Libertarianism is a revolutionary, radical ideology. It is about neverending change. There is no singular "end goal," but an infinite number of end goals, where each new person creates their own way, their own future, their own end. Conservatism is predicated on the idea that we must return to something, as it was the best. So-called anarchic conservatism, like Hoppeanism etc., attempts to push the notion that the return is to "nature," claiming that we must cast out anything the conservative finds "unnatural." Newsflash, sports fans, neverending change IS natural. Conditions are always changing, which drives each person to have a different set of conditions they're building from on TOP of their being a different person. This means there is no singular "best," nor was there. Libertarianism precludes a "return," a "best," or any other boxing of individuals. That is why the Paleoconservative attack on libertarianism is so silly: it's fundamentally incompatible. It is, by its very nature, an attack on libertarian ideology. If you don't want every single person to choose, for themself, who they want to be, how they want to be, for how long they want to be? You're missing the point of libertarianism. Yes, that leads to property rights, as property is an extension of the self. Yes, that leads to non-aggression, as aggression destroys the self. Libertarianism is about removing all barriers to the full-time creation of the self, for everyone, with everyone's work together to create the infinite selves.

💯