Sadly, today’s India is no longer the India of Nehru and Gandhi, but an India increasingly shaped by the RSS ideology. Its stance on Gaza is therefore a reflection of the political India that exists today.

Sadly, today’s India is no longer the India of Nehru and Gandhi, but an India increasingly shaped by the RSS ideology. Its stance on Gaza is therefore a reflection of the political India that exists today.

Bangladesh has resumed large-scale purchases of Indian wheat for the first time since 2022, with local importers booking over 200,000 tonnes following New Delhi's decision to lift export restrictions in late August Bangladesh had earlier approached Pakistan but Pakistan failed to supply the same.

CTA labels Wangchuk’s comparison of Ladakh situation with Tibet as incorrect. Sonam Wangchuk said “and today such oppression is being carried out against Ladakh that even China is not doing to Tibet what is being done here.” He is misguiding locals. #Ladakh #CTAcriticism #Leh

Please note, I started speaking out only after faculty forum went to the media and they mobilised faculty protest.. When you mobilise faculty against the student, who is no more, are you not subverting the possibility of fair investigation?

Meet Umesh Kumar Sharma, a Brilliant Self-Taught Mechanic from Rosera, Bihar who built a Custom Electric Cycle with a 100 km Range on a Single Charge. Armed with Grassroots Engineering and Local "Jugad," this 5th-grade Educated Innovator created an Ultra-low-cost vehicle that runs for just a few Rupees, bypassing the need for license or registration. It's so Nice to see that he has a Horn, Key, Voltage Indicator, Accelerator & the setup is so Awesome. So Relatable. He also has footrest for Pillion Rider. His incredible invention proves that True Innovation doesn't require Crazy League degrees. It just requires Passion, Grit, and Unstoppable Indian Ingenuity. He is An Inspiration. Let's Share This Widely ❤️❤️❤️ I wish to meet Umesh ji one Day !!! #FI

Omar Abdullah’s statehood resolution does not merely ask for statehood. It explicitly says “in addition to” the resolutions of June 26, 2000 and November 6, 2024. The 2000 resolution sought restoration of the pre-1953 constitutional arrangement: Centre confined largely to Defence, Foreign Affairs and Communications, Article 370 to be made “special” instead of “temporary”, separate constitutional symbols and institutions, Sadar-e-Riyasat and Wazir-e-Azam, no Article 356, sharply reduced parliamentary jurisdiction and restrictions on the role of institutions such as the Supreme Court, Election Commission and All India Services. The Vajpayee Cabinet rejected it as unacceptable, saying it would “set the clock back” and reverse the process of harmonising J&K’s aspirations with the integrity of the nation. And here is the historical irony. Omar Abdullah was a Union Minister in Vajpayee’s government when this autonomy debate unfolded. He served as Minister of State for Commerce and Industry from October 1999 to July 2001. The larger question is far more serious. If this is only about restoration of statehood, something the Prime Minister and Home Minister have repeatedly committed to, what was the bloody need to attach the 2000 resolution to it? Why sugarcoat a straightforward statehood demand with a document that sought a radically different constitutional relationship with India? In J&K, the politics of autonomy, separatism and a distinct constitutional identity unfolded alongside decades of Pakistan sponsored terrorism, violence and bloodshed that cost tens of thousands of lives. To drag those old constitutional fault lines back into mainstream politics is not a semantic exercise. It has consequences. The question is brutally simple: are ideas that were once pushed to the margins now being deliberately brought back into the political mainstream under the cover of a statehood resolution? Before elections and after elections, Omar Abdullah has projected himself as the reasonable, moderate and dependable face of the National Conference to New Delhi. Delhi must look beyond the cultivated “good boy” image and read the document. Today’s wording inevitably raises a legitimate question: is statehood the destination, or is it being presented as the first step towards reopening the older autonomy project? Common ordinary citizens have a legitimate concern. After 2019, the Indian State decisively established constitutional and security boundaries in J&K, and those who crossed those boundaries through terrorism, separatism or activities threatening national security faced action under the law. If the same political narratives and constitutional demands that once fuelled secessionism are being brought back into the mainstream, then the question is straightforward: why should those reopening these narratives be treated differently from those who were proceeded against for promoting them outside the Assembly? If the red lines drawn by the Indian State were necessary then, why should they become negotiable now?

🚨 EXPOSED: Citizen journalists just uncovered a MASSIVE network of fake daycares in Seattle taking up to $70K a MONTH in taxpayer money with ZERO kids inside! 🤯 When confronted, they panicked and raged. Audit EVERY SINGLE ONE, shut down the fraud, and send in law enforcement NOW! 🇺🇸

🚨#BREAKING: Absolutely HORRIFYING footage has emerged of a six Black males in Chicago brutally BEATING AND STOMPING ON THE HEAD of a White male. Zero people stop to help him. Everyone is standing around filming while he is stomped on, over and over.

Amen! We've seen it!

Chad women 🥰 Salute to her.

‘India illegally occupies Kashmir’, ‘manhoos desh’: Former JNU professor Nivedita Menon’s controversial remarks have followed her to Udaipur. Civil society groups are now demanding cancellation of her Rama Mehta Memorial Lecture, questioning why she was invited in the first place. Read the full story on Menon’s Kashmir, Army, UCC and latest remarks, and the controversy now brewing in Udaipur: opindia.com/2026/09/india-il…