Teachers to be banned from wearing Palestine badges as review finds 3 in 5 Jewish pupils have faced antisemitism at school trib.al/00Lztkq

The past 20 days have marked one of the most monolithic pushes by British media to vilify the Zionism is Racism Green Party motion. Imbalanced coverage would be an understatement. The papers wrote 447 articles on the Greens' Zionism vote. Israel, pro-Israel groups and the Chief Rabbi got 12,133 words. Palestinians got 3,173. Any institution that parades as a "news outlet" can no longer be taken seriously if it covers this motion without also covering the people, Palestinians, who have endured, suffered and been oppressed the most by the ideology in action. What the figures show: • Israel's government alone got 3,904 words. More than every Palestinian put together. • 2,422 of the 3,173 Palestinian words came in stories tying Lubna Speitan, the Palestinian who proposed the motion, to al-Qaeda. • Apart from Lubna, two Palestinians were quoted across 436 articles, for 76 words between them. Nobody in Gaza, the occupied West Bank or Lebanon was quoted at all. • Lubna told the Telegraph that 56 members of her family had been killed in Gaza. One article mentioned it: the Telegraph's own al-Qaeda story, in paragraph 44 of 51. • Lubna has received death and rape threats since the vote. Al Jazeera reported it. None of the 447 British articles did. • 43 articles said, in the paper's own voice, that the motion meant the destruction or abolition of Israel. The motion calls for one state with "equal rights for all". • 36 headlines said antisemitism. Not one of 447 said genocide. • 304 of the 436 articles we read in full never mentioned the genocide at all. • 0 of 89 comment pieces backed the motion. • The Daily Mail ran 38 articles on the motion, and in that time, just 2 on Israel's ongoing attacks across Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon. Full report: newscord.org/editorials/zion…

New Sign just dropped. Sarah Helm's version deemed safe by Terrorism Police! 🎉 Post yours below! 🧵 'God help us __(insert description of oneself)__ who support Palestine and Palestine Action.' @DefendOurJuries @kennardmatt

This is big. The UK’s National Security Advisor had nothing to do with banning Palestine Action as terrorists. Even though the question of terrorism is at the core of his job. So who did push the proscription of Palestine Action? The walls are closing in.

Bolsonaristas are literally marching through São Paulo with an inflatable missile that reads “TRUMP NUKE BRASIL” 🤯

The British government wants the public to fund the BBC through a “YouTube tax.” It wants YouTube and other platforms to push the BBC to the top of feeds. And for the past eight years, it has been lending the BBC its own government employees to help write the "fact-checks."

It has been 30 days since my mother and my aunts, Dr. Uzma and Noreen Niazi, were unlawfully detained under the MPO. Throughout their detention at Kot Lakhpat Jail, they have been denied access to family and legal counsel. No one, especially women, should be subjected to such treatment. With the detention order now ending, they must be released immediately.

Which country actually colonized Palestine—other than the British or the Ottoman Empire?The early Zionist arrivals were Jewish immigrants escaping Europe, not an imperial nation sending settlers to conquer the globe.After all, you support immigration, right?

New Sign just dropped. Sarah Helm's version deemed safe by Terrorism Police! 🎉 Post yours below! 🧵 'God help us __(insert description of oneself)__ who support Palestine and Palestine Action.' @DefendOurJuries @kennardmatt

Hey @grok, a small TEST: The university where Charlie Kirk was assassinated had technology capable of 𝗗𝗘𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘 in restricted areas, including rooftops. They always used it. It was 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗨𝗦𝗘𝗗 during his event. |@grok| YES or NO.