New entry in the European Dictionary 2026

Jej twarz powinna zastąpić logotyp Unii Europejskiej 😎

Its gotta be a racial instinct, right? How does it make sense to drag your garbage all the way to a park just to throw it in a pond? You passed by like 500 trash cans to do this. Like a beaver building a dam, or a sheep headbutting, the indian will pollute a waterway. Deport.

Boomers told their kids they would be worthless losers if they didn't go to college, then put them in 100k debt at the age of 18 with double digit interest rates, then outsourced all of the jobs overseas and then mocked their children for believing them in the first place

En el año 1865, San Juan Bosco soñó que había un hombre alto, de color negro y con cuernos, que tenía en su mano "una linterna mágica" con la cual entretenía a los jóvenes A través de esa "linterna mágica", los jóvenes podían ver cosas divertidas, partidos de fútbol que se habían perdido, pueblos lejanos, libros, familiares, amigos, vacaciones que habían tenido, dinero que les debían, y hasta "escenas pecaminosas", entre otras cosas Don Bosco relató que este dispositivo los entretenía tanto que alejaba a estos jóvenes de los sacramentos, especialmente de la comunión Este texto se encuentra bien documentado y disponible para el que quiera leerlo, en G. B. Lemoyne, Memorie Biografiche di San Giovanni Bosco, vol. VIII, p. 110.

It's funny how covid was this big unprecedented historical event but they're never going to make any movies about it because it would make everyone look retarded

Very important distinction

End the H-4. End the OPT. Travel ban for India. All before November. All within your control. No excuses.

Minneapolis now plans to close up to 16 of their public schools across the city due to massive budget constraints Meanwhile, Somalis are buying yachts Ya'll voted for this 🫵😂

Hey, @ticketmaster, since you offered refunds to all the crybabies who were “traumatized” by Macklemore saying “free Palestine“, are you also offering refunds for people who don’t want to go to a concert where an artist was kicked off a tour for speaking their mind? Because it’s only fair. But my guess is that you’re not gonna do that, huh?

Imagine telling a New Yorker in 2001 that in 25 years, we will have imported so many people from the third-world that their mayor would be a Muslim communist who giggles like a little girl while the names of the victims are honored during the 9/11 Memorial ceremony.

its so crazy as the greatest generation has died off and now boomers are grandparents we seen the ending of the "kind old matron" grandma stereotype that is essentially a domestic goddess who is kind and firm, replaced by this new vile batshit kronism ex-hippy whore archetype

These children were murdered. That is an indisputable fact. They were murdered by the woman who gave them life. That is an indisputable fact. The issue obsessing the usual suspects on the left is when is murder of the innocent acceptable. It has been their banner for decades now.

Imagine working your ass off to get to a 100k a year position only to get killed by a fat mexican and then for leftists to make fun of your death cause they think you’re an evil billionaire

Un super-héros d'un nouveau genre vient en aide à une femme voilée en détresse

When someone overseas gets a job in America, they don't just get a job. They get to reside in America. They live next door to you. Their kids go to school with your kids. Obviously the decision about who gets to live next door to you and go to school with your kids shouldn't be made by a tech CEO.

Investors like Paul want the immigration debate to be strictly polar because it is the only way their traitorous ideas might seem reasonable. They paint one side as racist, backwards, economically illiterate absolutists and the other as enlightened, growth-minded cosmopolitian realists. Support for laws that protect American citizens can be dismissed as uneducated, anyone who hires immigrants or foreigners in any capacity a hypocrite. American law should, and does, advantage American citizens. We should not have to compete on an even playing field with billions of people who almost universally don't share our values or respect our institutions, even if they are "the most qualified" or willing to work double the hours for the same wages. The men running Operation Paperclip did not think Americans should have to compete with the entire Third World, they understood that a carefully controlled amount of highly-skilled expert immigration is net good for America even when allegience is in question. It is worth noting that even on a purely economic level, ignoring all burdens of loyalty or allegiance to your countrymen and treating America as nothing but an economic activity zone, it still doesn't make sense to say without qualification that foreigners should get any job where they are more qualified than their American counterpart. As just one easy example out of dozens, about 20% of immigrants return home after less than five years, taking all their savings and vested shares with them. Another 20% will leave within ten years, doing the same. All the while, they will wire, on average, ~15% of their wages out of the United States economy every month. Some occupations and origins average 30%! The idea that this should be completely ignored with regard to employment and immigration policy is rampant among the same people who tell you with a straight face that limits on immigrants will destroy the American economy, that the dumb rednecks need to be saved. I lean very libertarian and have strongly supported immigration to America for many years with countless public examples. That doesn't put me on the same side as the men who want to sell out America, and no amount of long-past accomplishment obliges any of us to listen to their lectures from the other side of the Atlantic.

There is a piece of cloth in Mexico City that scientists have been arguing about for five hundred years, and they still cannot agree on a very simple question: did a human being paint it or not? The cloth is a tilma, a cloak of coarse cactus fiber, and according to the Nahuatl narrative known as the Nican Mopohua, it belonged to an indigenous man named Juan Diego. In December 1531, ten years after the Spanish conquest, he said a radiant young woman appeared to him near the hill of Tepeyac, spoke to him in his own language, and named herself the mother of God. She asked that a church be built on the hill and she sent him to the bishop of Mexico City, Juan de Zumárraga. The bishop did not believe him, and asked for a sign. Days later the lady sent Juan Diego to the frozen hilltop, where nothing should have been growing, and there he found roses in full bloom, out of season in the dead of winter. He gathered them into his cloak. When he reached the bishop and let the cloak fall open the roses spilled to the floor. And on the rough fabric was an image no one had painted: a dark-haired, olive-skinned woman, head bowed, hands joined. Zumárraga fell to his knees... That cloak still hangs in the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe, the most-visited Catholic shrine in the world. It has been studied for centuries... In a Church inquiry of 1666, seven professional painters testified that it seemed impossible for a human artist to have made something so refined on cloth so coarse. The fabric itself is an enigma: the tilma is woven from cactus fiber, the kind of cloth that normally rots away within 20 or 30 years, yet nearly 500 years on it has not cracked or decayed. In 1936 the Nobel chemist Richard Kuhn reported that the colors came from no known source, not animal, not mineral, not vegetable. Some, especially the blue-green of the mantle, match no natural dye of the region, and researchers have described the image as faintly iridescent, its tone seeming to shift with the angle you view it from, an effect they say should not be possible on such a cloth. In 1979 the biophysicist Philip Callahan photographed it under infrared light and reported that, in the original parts of the figure, he could find no preparatory sketch and no visible brushstrokes, though he also documented many later human additions and touch-ups that had cracked and faded over time. The strangest claims concern the eyes: in 1956 the first ophthalmologists to examine them under magnification reported something they could not explain. The eyes appeared to contain the triple reflection that a living human eye produces, the images sitting exactly where they should and distorting just as they would against the curve of a real cornea. Decades later the engineer José Aste Tonsmann, using digital enhancement, claimed to find as many as thirteen figures reflected there, each packed into a space about a hundredth of an inch across, which he believed were the people gathered in the room at the very moment Juan Diego opened his cloak. But the case is far from settled and not every examination agrees. A 1982 study by José Sol Rosales says the image was made with ordinary sixteenth-century materials and techniques. And the doubt is old: in 1556, just twenty-five years after the apparition, a senior Franciscan, Francisco de Bustamante, preached a furious sermon in Mexico City calling it a painting, the work, he said, of an indigenous artist named Marcos. The image has been contested almost from the moment it appeared. And that is exactly what makes it extraordinary: this fragile cloth has survived nearly five hundred years of candle smoke, incense, humidity, a nitric acid spill in the late 1700s that should have eaten it away, and a bomb set off directly beneath it in 1921 that bent a brass crucifix and shattered marble around it, and left the cloak untouched. It is one of the most examined objects in human history, and after five centuries the examinations still do not agree. Some of the most brilliant minds who ever studied it walked away certain, and they walked away certain of opposite things...