I’ve been looking into @Investabl recently, and honestly, their plans are looking interesting. 👀 34 traders took home $5,025.64 in rewards last week, with settlements on-chain and 38 public, verifiable hashes. Transparency like this definitely stands out. I’m considering trading with Investabl myself. Let’s see how it goes. 👀 Trust is built through results, not slogans.

I was literally telling everyone to go with ACG when other firms were doing dodgy things because I genuinely trusted these guys. Even when i first started trading i must have spent over £30k with them… After 3 payouts, a risk interview and being in the 1% risk group, this is how it ends - terminated over an alleged CID/device issue that I genuinely don’t understand. I’ve only ever accessed my ACG MT5 from my own iPhone and have never managed or traded anyone else’s account. I’ve asked them to show me exactly what these 9 CIDs represent and what evidence links me personally to the other accounts. Honestly, they’ve done me dirty. I guess it’s back to FTMO for me. 🫠 I’ll keep you guys updated on this situation as it develops. I also know a few people who’ve had similar situations happen to them - genuinely quiet traders who have made £60k+ from ACG and have then been banned despite saying they’ve done nothing wrong. They’ve apparently been told their cases are closed, which honestly doesn’t sit right with me. It does make you question whether smaller, quieter traders get treated differently from traders with a much bigger public profile. I’m not saying that’s definitely what’s happening, but when you see things like this happening, it’s hard not to question it. And just to make one thing crystal clear: I am NOT stupid enough to trade someone else’s account, manage accounts or do any bullshit like that. I’ve been involved in trading for around 5 years. After everything I’ve put into this(6 figures), I’d have to be an absolute idiot to risk everything by doing something so stupid. I’m going to keep pushing this because I genuinely believe there has to be an explanation for what’s happened. I won’t stop just because I’m a smaller trader. If you told me last week that ACG would do something like this to me, I would have bet my entire life savings saying they wouldn’t. I’ve always said Alpha Futures were great and ACG CFD was great - until now. What can you do, life goes on eh. But I’ll keep you guys updated @PropFirmMatch @AlphaCapitalUK @Alpha_Futures_ @ACGMarkets @Propfirmedge @PropFirmAdvisrs @PropFirmMedia

This firm also blocked me ? #aquafunded @RyanAquaFunded I only asked payout and there public page also blocked me ? #propfirm #fundedtrader

Traders, if this video reaches you, you’re lucky. I’m here to save you from the @AquaFunded scam. 🚨 Watch this video before you trust them with your money. Share it with other traders. 🛑 @LewisAquaFunded @shepherd_fx #propfirm #fundedtraders

🚨 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐒, 𝐎𝐏𝐄𝐍 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐄𝐘𝐄𝐒 — 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝐁𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐋𝐘 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆. @fundingpips & @Khldfx . READ THIS BEFORE YOU BUY AN ACCOUNT. 📅 7 July – I received an email stating that my ongoing $50K Phase 1 challenge was being breached for a CID violation. No evidence was attached. 📅 9 July – I emailed FundingPips asking for proof. No response. 📅 11 July – I contacted support. Their response? "We cannot share the proof due to privacy reasons." Privacy reasons? How does showing the suspected account number, login date, and time violate anyone's privacy? I explained that there must be a mistake. Their answer: "We rechecked the issue. The ban is fair." Case closed. No evidence provided. 📅 15 July – I started posting publicly asking for the evidence. After posting daily and commenting on FundingPips-related posts, I finally received the "proof" on 28 July. That's 21 days later. The proof that should have been included in the original breach email only appeared after public pressure on X. So the proof can be posted on social media, but it can't be shared privately with the trader being accused? And here's where it gets interesting. The alleged CID violation wasn't from my active $50K challenge. It was supposedly from December, 7 months earlier, on a $100K Phase 1 account. The same account that: ✅ Passed Phase 1 ✅ Passed Phase 2 ✅ Passed review ✅ Received a Master Account ✅ Was traded for weeks ✅ Was eventually breached during a losing streak Only when I later purchased a new $50K challenge did FundingPips suddenly decide that this old account had a CID violation. So what caused it? A copier. I was managing more than 5 accounts, so before using @Duplikium I specifically asked FundingPips moderators in Discord whether I could use a copier. Their answer: "Use any copier." I used Duplikium. Later, Duplikium confirmed that: ✅ I was using their service ✅ The account in question was connected to their infrastructure I submitted the confirmations, the timeline, and my explanation to @avikkfp email . I also posted everything publicly. The result? Silence. No meaningful review. No acknowledgement of the counter-evidence. Just the same decision. At this point, I don't even want to trade with your firm anymore. But when your own evidence is challenged with documented counter-evidence, the least you can do is refund the money traders paid instead of ignoring them. Transparency shouldn't require public pressure. Evidence shouldn't appear 21 days after a ban. And traders shouldn't be expected to accept accusations without a fair review.