Paleolithic hunter gatherer trying to survive as the Anthropic passes to the Siliconic. Undercover mathematician.
Contrarian. Irrationally angry. A bit toxic.
I don't think AI will destroy humanity but maybe people's takes on this count the big labs doing something really stupid, like exactly this. Whereas from my POV this would be Anthropic as a company destroying humanity, which I genuinely would not rule out
most mathematicians are on-the-spectrums who just want to be left alone to solve their favorite flavor of puzzle
any lasting aura loss is going to be because of try-hard tech bros clamoring to convince the world that they were actually smarter than mathematicians all along
Totally agree. We're witnessing unprecedented aura loss for mathematicians.
It just looks like the pursuit of math was more about looking smart than solving the problems.
You are so gleeful about my life as a mathematician crumbling. Why? Did I do something to you? Did I ever do something to you beyond the crime of learning and thinking about things?
wtf are you talking about.
the "special treatment" is simply proper citation, and making sure there's no plagiarism going on.
they're about to equally "destroy" entry level Mathematicians market
I don’t really have an opinion on this yet, but the idea that I might witness the end of math as a human pursuit does kind of make me want to throw up. dizzying
Why the heck they need to "solve" 100 long standing problems? Do they think they are picking mushrooms?
This is certainly not for benchmarking purposes (with 5 or 6 it will be fine).
They probably don't want to leave any to their competitor (??).
They don't want to leave any to their customers (??).
Many of the solutions will be slop machine papers with a ton of Lean formalization. Are these of any use?
I am curious to see what the advisory board has to say on that. Probably they appointed this advisory board to clean their face.
I think I am moving to chinese LLMs that seem to behave more respectfully to MATHEMATICS.
(Yeah....Kimi and DeepSeek are pretty good for math also)
We’re working with an independent advisory group of mathematicians to help OpenAI responsibly share advances in AI and mathematics.
The group will advise on how we assess and communicate new mathematical results, uphold academic and professional standards, and build tools that support mathematical research and learning.
Through this work, we want mathematicians to be at the center of shaping how AI supports mathematical understanding and how its benefits reach the wider community.
openai.com/index/advisory-gr…
Aren't you holding a position at MAISI(the ai safety stuff)? I think that should have been mentioned alongside the fact that you are not hired by OpenAI.
I've written a blog post responding to the letter about maths and AI signed by 25 Fields medallists. As with the Leiden Declaration, I didn't sign it, but I agree with much of it and welcome its existence.
gowers.wordpress.com/2026/09…
Last year U.S. federal government sharply reduced funding for mathematics. While OpenAI (state sponsored company) is spending millions of dollars for this psyop
Reading through the final draft of a paper some coauthors and I have written (ourselves!) has reawoken my faith in mathematics. Like everything I write, it's not amazing world-changing work; but it's so cute, like an adorable robotic little kitten.
Is there a reason OpenAI and Anthropic are focusing on solving abstract mathematical problems, where as Tao says, the results themselves are not the goal, rather than curing cancer, where results matter more than understanding?
Applications of mathematics primarily come from the concepts created in solving problems within math. The mathematicians are defending the part of math that produces applications from the AI companies who cynically using math for PR.
the mathematicians are telling us actually, math is not about solving math problems. it's about art and training people and Fields medals and stuff like that. so how about we start a new field that's focused purely on solving math problems? we can call it applied mathematics
A very common sentiment I'm hearing among math students: "I don't want to become a mathematician anymore." I've seen this before, I think the generation of digital artists who came of age around 2022 will be the last.
AI might not functionally replace mathematicians or artists, but it might well cause their near-extinction anyway, by crushing the spirits of the younger generations.