The thing you don’t always know about professional radio is that the producers can make anyone look good (even me).
Interesting and important debate about surveillance and policing.
Enjoyed producing this conversation with @ProfFerguson about flock cameras, the broader surveillance ecosystem being used by law enforcement and what local leaders can do to balance public safety and privacy concerns
wamu.org/story/26/09/18/dc-v…
An unusual moment in policing is taking shape: police unions, civil rights groups, conservative politicians and grassroots activists find themselves in an unlikely alliance calling for rapidly expanding surveillance tech to be reined in.
A “tipping point,” says @ProfFerguson.
Resistance to Flock has made its way to the DMV. In Washington, the head of the city police union said MPD used the cameras to investigate sworn officers. And officials in Alexandria signaled this week they don’t want Flock in their city.
w/ @conarckwashingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/…
If true, and especially if this is becoming routine, very troubling. Curious what lawyers/law profs would do in this situation. SCOTUS has never weighed in on this practice.
Thoughts, @OrinKerr, others?
teddit.net/r/GlobalEntry/s/B…
You’ve probably read the headlines about Flock Cameras. But they are just the most visible frontier in an era of AI-powered policing.
Right now, police are adopting AI tools at a staggering rate and using them to build an efficient, centralized surveillance infrastructure.
On this week’s episode of Your Undivided Attention, @tristanharris speaks with Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist @garanceburke and law professor @ProfFerguson about how police are using AI today, what we can expect in the near future, and what protections we need to create now, before it's too late.
Check it out:
Watch - bit.ly/4dsrtG0
Listen - apple.co/4A59Ky3
Read - bit.ly/4xdyKk7
ANDROMEDA DIAZ AND THE REASONABLE DOUBT IS OUT TODAY!!!
Anywhere you like to buy books, you can buy a copy of this book that is not only a twisty mystery, but will teach your children how to think like public defenders.
Sharp critical thinking, deep empathy.
LFG.
If you are a news outlet/ #book reviewer/ #bookclub and you passed on the book about the summer’s biggest policing surveillance story, I don’t blame you. I, too, am surprised about anti-Flock.
But the issues are harder and more nuanced.
It’s all here.
nyupress.org/9781479838295/y…
Flock is the tip of the AI police surveillance iceberg. Time to educate yourself, debate, and demand solutions.
The problems are all here (with endnotes). nyupress.org/9781479838295/y…
Obviously everyone interested in flock and other surveillance systems should read my book. But they should also read Professor Moskos’ books. You won’t agree, but they are valuable.
Flock's "guardrails" are an admission that they could have addressed a lot of concerns much earlier. They're only doing so due to strong national opposition to their tech.
Public pressure works.
secure-justice.org/blog/floc…
NEW: Flock says its cameras don’t identify or track people
We obtained the code for its police AI and rebuilt parts of it
The tool can find witnesses, surface associates, search people by race or physical description, and flag vehicles by how they move.
wired.com/story/flock-safety…
This is a big deal for the 4th Amendment. Will be interesting if similar thinking re: innocent people being swept up in mass surveillance tools is ever applied to, say, Flock.
🚨 A federal judge ruled that "tower dump" warrants, which allow police to obtain records for every cellphone that connected to nearby cell towers around a crime scene, are per se unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment as general warrants.
Thanks to @SeamusHughes for fighting to unseal these records.
“The public conversation comes last, not first—and only much later do we start to fully understand the damage these technologies can do.”
Thank you, @iamjohnoliver for sounding the alarm on #MassSurveillance.
Watch here: piped.video/watch?v=lnBPhelC…