Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
But it was okay when Obama did it, right?
Too bad for Obama, the Internet never forgets.
38
. @Grok what did the Obama admin do to journalist James Rosen?
40
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
Yeah….
Senator Chris Murphy to Jennifer Welch: Government needs to regulate social media so people are less likely to support a candidate like President Trump. The left will censor your speech as soon as they have the power to do so. They're not hiding the ball here. They did it before. They will do so again.
7
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
@ChrisMurphyCT is all about attacking the first amendment. By proposing the government controlling your internet usage. The press still has free speech you dumb cunt. To be on the White House press pool is by invitation only.
11
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
What outrageous nonsense. “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” Those news organizations were only denied special access to the President, access not afforded to most news organizations or to citizens for that matter. That special access, and indeed, that free press right, ought to carry a corresponding responsibility...to tell the truth. Truth is a concept foreign to many journalists and news organizations, and to the Democrats (like you), whom they favor. Here is a quote from a White House correspondent who requested not to be identified: "I don't report the news. I make it up, or in some cases I just leave it out. It depends on the agenda-du-jour. And, if a stray fact or two makes its way into one of my news stories, it's only because I'm lazy."
14
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
Please explain how it violates the first amendment.
12
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
How is this remotely relevant to the First Amendment?
9
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
So every journalist in America is guaranteed a spot at the Whitehouse? Im confused where that is in the constitution.
7
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
They're defending their right to a free press by banning together and refusing to report any news that has to do with Trump! That's RICH!
13
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
Nobody took away their first amendment rights, they just lost their privilege to be in the room,no different than losing your driver's license which is a privilege also
5
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
You're irrelevant after coddling up the DNC with DSA. DSA formerly known as ANTIFA.
31
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
OMG SO OUTRAGEOUS. WAIT I NEED TO FIND MY PEARLS SO I CAN CLUCH THEM.
1
13
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
You mean lying press
4
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
Let me help fix this: "I am proud to see the major FAKE news outlets standing together to defend the right to a free press."
9
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
How is it? Have they been prevented from reporting? Have CNN or MSNOW been banned from reporting? Have any CNN or MSNOW reporters been arrested? Detained? IF you can report on the WH revoking your press credentials, sounds the 1A is still working and they have the freedom to report. #ThinkDifferent
3
45
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
How do dumbasses like you con people into voting for you?
9
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
If only you understood the 1st Ammendment. Have you ever read the Constitution? Not an outrage nor an attack, a common sense move to upgrade / update the WH Press Corps to reflect American news consumption. We don’t need a corporation nor cable channel. We have @X
15
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
How can it be journalism if the “journalists” are flat out lying. That’s not news. That’s propaganda.
1
5
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
Lying is deceitful and the agenda of the democratic party. The first amendment has been used as a prop by the COMMUNIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY. LIARS
8
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
You can always take out an ad on TRUMP TV. 🤣
44
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
When the 'news' agencies are spewing bovine scatology, that's not news. Journalism died when @BarackObama converted news to entertainment news.
6
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
Post the line that says access or die
4
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
HOW DARE THEY!
I can’t for the life of me figure out why Trump wouldn’t want MSNOW inside the White House… Oh, wait. Yes I can. Because of things like THIS. 👇
11
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
The press your are referring to are activists for the Democrat party, not journalists
5
Nobody is stopping you from lying.
27
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
You won't even believe this 😱
White House Access Is a Privilege Not a Right FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Last week, President Donald J. Trump removed CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House grounds after years of false reporting . The First Amendment protects their right to publish; it does not entitle them to a hard pass, briefing room seat, or place in the press pool. Access changes are nothing new. What is new, however, is the sudden claim that it becomes sacred only when the outlets are friendly to the Radical Left. The rule was never “every outlet gets in.” It was always “our side stays in.” For years, Democrat Administrations have restricted, punished, and locked out the press. 2009: The Obama White House branded Fox News as the “research arm” and “communications arm” of the Republican Party, barred it from a round of exclusive Sunday show interviews, instructed agencies to “skip” including it in pooled coverage, derided it as “really not news,” and undertook an all-out effort to isolate the organization. Barack Hussein Obama now calls a Fox ban “unimaginable,” but his White House tried it and his spokesman admitted they were willing to do it. 2010: The Obama Justice Department labeled Fox News correspondent James Rosen a possible “co-conspirator” in a criminal leak case, secretly monitored his emails and phone calls, and tracked his movements an “unprecedented” level of surveillance and intimidation of a journalist over his reporting. 2011: Obama White House officials restricted the Boston Herald from coverage writing that pool slots depended on covering Obama “fairly” after the paper ran a front page Mitt Romney op-ed. 2011: After a San Francisco Chronicle reporter recorded protesters interrupting an Obama fundraiser, White House officials threatened to strip the outlet from access and warned of retaliation if the paper reported on it. 2012: The Obama Justice Department secretly seized two months of telephone records covering more than 20 Associated Press lines used by more than a dozen journalists targeting them over their reporting. 2023: The Biden White House blocked New York Post reporter Steven Nelson from covering the President’s only daytime public event despite empty seats in the room after the reporter pressed Biden on his family’s shady business dealings. 2023: The Biden Administration restricted more than 440 reporters from White House access through a new, retroactive press credentialing process with independent and conservative journalists taking a heavy share of the hit. The White House Correspondents’ Association barely objected. 2008: In the Obama campaign’s final days, senior campaign officials pulled reporters from three prominent outlets off the traveling press plane restricting them from coverage after the papers endorsed Obama’s opponent. 2021: The same media now suing once urged a ban on Fox News. CNN’s Brian Stelter repeatedly floated removing Fox News from the White House press tool as a “political tool,” and later even suggested Fox News be dropped from cable altogether. During the first 100 days of President Trump’s second term, the Media Research Center found that 92% of coverage by mainstream outlets was negative compared to nearly 60% positive coverage during the same period under Biden. That’s more like a political operation with cameras than a free press holding power to account. No President is required to host a hostile operation on the grounds. Access has always been a privilege and President Trump is applying that rule. Distributed on September 21st, 2026.
10
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
It has nothing to do with the constitution Has been
18
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
The first amendment doesn’t give the press tge right to report fake news from the Whitehouse.
12
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
Just another ignorant Democrat, bitch, how was that in a outrageous attack when the first amendment they’re still blowing fake stories out their asses
1
26
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
Replying to @libsoftiktok
The media: "Trump is violating the 1st Amendment by uninviting biased outlets from the White House!" (Even though they’re still 100% free to write and publish whatever they want). The media’s actual response? Collectively agreeing to completely censor and halt coverage of the President. Let this sink in. They accuse him of suppressing free speech, then turn around and use coordinated blackouts to gatekeep what the public is allowed to hear. And they wonder why people don't consider them journalists anymore, but propagandists.
4
Replying to @RepDianaDeGette
We don’t care what you think. You are a loser who gave us a communist to represent us in Congress
1
6