The Supreme Court plays a vital role in our constitutional system: interpreting the law as written. When Congress disagrees with how a law is interpreted, the answer is to legislate, not to change the structure of the Court.

Sep 14, 2026 · 7:05 PM UTC

12
13
34
2,876
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
@RepLaurelLee @JudiciaryGOP All State And Federal Judiciary Are Unconstitutionally Seated, THAT’S THE PROBLEM. Prove Me Wrong. 😑 @PrometheanActn @EagleEdMartin @POTUS @WhiteHouse @EdMartinDOJ @realDonaldTrump @VP @JDVance @AGToddBlanche @AAGDhillon @HarmeetKDhillon @TheJusticeDept @CivilRights @dhsgov @USSupremeCourt @SCOTUSblog @SecWar @PeteHegseth @ODNIgov @DNIPulte @StephenM We are ruled by unconstitutional direct and indirect popular vote-seated state and federal judicial cartels that rule this nation via tyrannical state and federal judicial edicts. There is no rule of law or equal protection under the law when state and federal judiciary are seated unconstitutionally via direct and indirect popular vote from the most populous counties and cities in those counties in all 50 states, territories, and possessions. This is unconstitutional under Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution (the Guarantee Clause), which states: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.” There are supposed to be three voices represented in our federal government, hence the three branches: • The voice of the people, represented in state and federal Houses of Representatives. • The voice of the state, represented in state and federal Senates. • The voice of the law, the state and federal judiciary. The problem is that the voice of the people—which is already represented in state and federal Houses of Representatives via direct popular vote—now also seats the voice of the state and the law from the same voting pool: only the most populous counties and cities in those counties. That means only that voting pool has any representation in our state and federal government. This creates an unconstitutional democracy form of government, violating Article IV, Section 4, which requires the United States to guarantee a republican form of government to the states—not a mob-seated democracy. It is impossible to be a constitutional republic when state and federal judiciary are seated by direct or indirect popular vote only from the most populous counties and cities (i.e., the mob—the voice of the people), which also seats state and federal Houses of Representatives and Senates from that same pool of voters. There is no equal protection under the law in such an unconstitutional democratic form of state and federal government. The United States has failed to guarantee a republican form of government to the states since 1849, when Luther v. Borden set in motion the practice of states seating state judiciary via direct popular vote. What originally made the United States a constitutional republic was the guarantee of a republican form of government to the states, which required an independent state judiciary seated by the state Senate (the voice of the state as a whole) for state district courts and above, including state supreme courts. The voice of the people represents population centers and cities, which have the density to cancel out rural areas. When the voice of the state resided in the United States Senate—senators chosen in full and open sessions of state legislatures—and those senators seated an independent federal judiciary, that structure created the constitutional republic. That does not exist today. What exists is an anti-republican democratic form of state and federal government masquerading as a constitutional republic—which it is not.
21
Replying to @RepLaurelLee
Welp…. That’s not going help midterms. #LaurelLee #Trump
17
Don’t worry if the save America act isn’t passed you’ll be out of power.
9
Replying to @RepLaurelLee
Except: 1. SCOTUS doesn't interpret the law as written (birthright citizenship) 2. Congress doesn't legislate
21
Replying to @RepLaurelLee
Fox no longer plays a role in information.
6
Replying to @RepLaurelLee
The Trump years are having the requisite effect on the democrats. I wonder how the Vance years will be received?
8
Replying to @RepLaurelLee
Another ugly MAGA cunt
1
7
Replying to @RepLaurelLee
Replying to @SenRickScott
#RickScott did this to middle class Americans!! Then has the audacity to talk about affordability. Now he’s coming for your #Medicare & #SocialSecurity calling it an entitlement instead of what you’ve been paying for your entire life! NEVER & I mean NEVER VOTE REPUBLICAN AGAIN.
17
Replying to @RepLaurelLee
Republicans did this! ⬇️
4