The Government wasnt even allowed a chance to respond before the Judge ruled against you? Sounds exactly as is allowed everday for the rest of us citizens when ex parte restraining orders are illegally issued by judges for false claims against everyday Americans like
@JamesOKeefeIII & I both had happen recently in FL(!) to strip our 2nd Amend
@CivilRights, later overturned as illegal (mine was by an H1B UK foreigner who lied to ludge in filing,
@USLaborIG).
Why not stop those abuses, work with
@FLGunRights since you now what it feels like to be held hostage to such judicial tyranny? We would support, and its line with Chief Justice Roberts statement below:
Kaley v. United States, 571 U.S. 320, 355 (2014) (“Common sense tells us that secret decisions based only on one side of the story will prove inaccurate more often than those made after hearing from both sides.” (Roberts, C.J., dissenting)); see also United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 590 U.S. 371, 375 (2020) (“In our adversarial system of adjudication, we follow the principle of party presentation. As this Court stated in Greenlaw, in both civil and criminal cases, in the first instance and on appeal ..., we rely on the parties to frame the issues for decision and assign to courts the role of neutral arbiter of matters the parties present.” (citation omitted) (Ginsburg, J.)).