Host @NkanythingPod, Co-Founder @tomorrowtgther, Founder of Narrowcast Media. | Was: @kamalaharris @Joebiden @WhiteHouse @Marshalls |

Paid to be here
Rob Flaherty retweeted
The populist theory of how Democrats can beat Republicans has consistently validated by swing voters and independents.
10
17
99
7,252
This whole arc is very funny. A guy getting a lot of press incoming hired a firm to help him with press incoming. Like....yeah?
Exclusive in @PirateWires: Jacob has been working with DEY., the PR firm that represents Eliezer Yudkowsky and other famous AI doomers. We also heard that DEY. was preemptively looking to book Nate Soares (MIRI founder) for interviews timed with Jacob's debut.
12
2
99
11,718
My 'my glasses are not pervert glasses' glasses are raising a number of questions already answered by my glasses
Mark Zuckerberg addressed the "pervert glasses" nickname for the first time in an exclusive sit-down interview with NBC News nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/m…
3
30
4,816
Rob Flaherty retweeted
Seems chill and not worth regulating
Update in the rogue A.I. saga: OpenAI agents that were supposed to be performing mundane data pulls for things like health info, historic photos and wait times at theme parks resorted to hacking attempts when they couldn't access the data they wanted nytimes.com/2026/09/23/techn…
1
1
1,211
Rob Flaherty retweeted
how did 2028 Dems get AI-pilled? two ways –– gradually, then suddenly. here's a snapshot of just the past 2 weeks:
5
9
72
9,988
The reality is that deep down these guys care more about crushing the libs than passing their bill but we'll just repeat this ad-infinitum
The 2024 election proved the importance of the crypto voter. @standwithcrypto is now much bigger, with over 4M members. Crypto voters will remember who stepped up and who didn't.
1
24
4,346
The irony here is that CLARITY went down in the first place because A16Z are a bunch of partisan chuds
NEWS: Here comes the crypto industry’s big spending against Democrats. Fairshake is going to spend $30 million against Sherrod Brown in Ohio’s Senate race. It’s payback after Senate Dems torpedoed the CLARITY Act. nytimes.com/2026/09/21/us/po…
1
6
79
23,573
Rob Flaherty retweeted
Pretty telling that Fairshake is going after a Democrat who did not vote on the Clarity Act (because he’s no longer in the Senate), and not going after Republican Susan Collins, who voted against it. Big crypto just dropping all remaining pretenses of being non-partisan.
NEWS: Here comes the crypto industry’s big spending against Democrats. Fairshake is going to spend $30 million against Sherrod Brown in Ohio’s Senate race. It’s payback after Senate Dems torpedoed the CLARITY Act. nytimes.com/2026/09/21/us/po…
29
221
1,059
70,511
“We have laws to hold AI companies liable if their technology kills people” “Should we not try to prevent them from killing people in the first place” “No”
4
2
17
2,140
Very specifically this! The people warning the hardest are the folks actually working on this stuff; many of whom are throwing away lots of money by jumping ship over safety concerns.
I cannot impart on progressive folks more strongly that it is not just Sam Altman sounding these alarms. I also do not care for or trust Sam Altman! But listen to the people actually building this stuff who are freaked out. Maybe they are wrong but they are not part of some profit motivated psyop.
5
3
42
6,337
Remarkable, really, that Obama is so far out ahead of basically every other political figure in America in his understanding of every dimension of this issue
Obama on recursive self improvement and the risks associated with it. When he talks about the urgency for us all to have a say in how this technology evolves and how it is overseen, this is part of the reason why: “The models are going to get smarter and smarter and better and better at a much faster pace, at an exponential pace.   What are the risks of that? There’s the big science fiction risk, wow, these models get smarter than us, and they decide humans are fine, but not necessary. They start setting their own goals, and the killer robots kill us, or we bow down to them.   I do not want to exaggerate that particular risk, but I will say there is a non-zero risk of non-zero chance of that happening, but that’s not actually the risk that I’m most concerned about, although it’s the risk that gets most attention.   And the reason that’s a risk is not because the computer models are conscious, necessarily. It doesn’t mean that they are necessarily feel malice towards humans. It’s just that if they start setting their own agendas, you may get a misalignment between what they want to do and what we want them to do, and that gap can be dangerous. That’s problem number one.   The more serious problem is these models are getting powerful enough that if they get in the hands of bad humans, they can do bad things. They can be weaponized in certain ways. They can do a lot of mischief.”
58
131
1,149
120,052
Rob Flaherty retweeted
21
231
2,979
132,986
Rob Flaherty retweeted
If a Democratic FEC nuked Scam PACs from orbit, they'd be doing constituent service AND unlock tens of millions of misdirected dollars for candidates - significantly increasing their hard money / lowest unit rate advantage vs. Republican super PACs. Good policy. Good politics.
9
59
403
30,310
AOC in Ithaca is like the Pope showing up in South Philly
NEWS: AOC is planning to campaign across New York in coming weeks — Buffalo, Syracuse, Ithaca — and just gave $300k to state coordinated campaign. Moves come as she weighs whether she will run for Senate in NY or president in 2028. nytimes.com/2026/09/18/us/po…
13
37
1,333
86,459
@AOC go to The Westy
2
5
1,075
Democrats: idk should we talk about regulating AI? We're scared. but what about our messaging framework Republicans: we are going to talk about regulating AI
Fascinating to see Republicans run on AI safety. New spot from the group Alliance for A Better Future backing Mike Rogers and using recent comments from Sam Altman and Dario Amodei. Rogers is probably the most vocal guardrails-minded GOP Senate nominee, and now gets air cover for it.
3
9
45
8,868
they are doing what now
Anthropic has set up a wet lab in San Francisco, their bio research has advanced beyond in silico. They are now conducting physical research both in-house and with external partners. The NYT also broke the news this morning that Anth now plans to scale its compute to 5 GW by the end of the year, and 10 GW within the next 16 months. Bio is next after math, and I think we are going to see some medical announcements much sooner than people are expecting.
1
15
3,014